Trapping LLM Hallucinations Using Tagged Context Prompts
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors: Philip Feldman, James R. Foulds, Shimei Pan
- Challenge: Hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT
- Importance of the issue as AI-driven platforms are widely adopted
- Proposed method: Recognize and flag instances of LLMs performing outside their domain knowledge
- Use of context and embedded tags to combat hallucinations in generative language models
- Baseline established for hallucination frequency without context
- Observation of significant reduction in overall hallucination when context is provided with question prompts
- Evaluation of the impact of placing tags within contexts on model responses
- Impressive 98.88% effectiveness achieved in eliminating hallucinations by employing this approach
- Contribution to addressing limitations of large language models by identifying and mitigating hallucinations
- Assurance of accurate information from AI-driven conversational agents like ChatGPT through incorporation of contextual information and embedded tags
Authors: Philip Feldman, James R. Foulds, Shimei Pan
Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have led to highly sophisticated conversation agents. However, these models suffer from "hallucinations," where the model generates false or fabricated information. Addressing this challenge is crucial, particularly with AI-driven platforms being adopted across various sectors. In this paper, we propose a novel method to recognize and flag instances when LLMs perform outside their domain knowledge, and ensuring users receive accurate information. We find that the use of context combined with embedded tags can successfully combat hallucinations within generative language models. To do this, we baseline hallucination frequency in no-context prompt-response pairs using generated URLs as easily-tested indicators of fabricated data. We observed a significant reduction in overall hallucination when context was supplied along with question prompts for tested generative engines. Lastly, we evaluated how placing tags within contexts impacted model responses and were able to eliminate hallucinations in responses with 98.88% effectiveness.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.