This paper explores the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in applying tax law and how it can contribute to improving legal services, AI governance, and identifying inconsistencies in the law. The authors chose tax law as their focus because it allows them to set up automated validation pipelines, requires logical reasoning and math skills, and is relevant to the real-world economic lives of citizens and companies. Through experiments, they demonstrate that LLMs have emerging legal understanding capabilities, with improved performance in each subsequent model release by OpenAI. They also find that providing additional legal context to LLMs enhances their performance, particularly when combined with few-shot prompting techniques. However, while LLMs can perform at high levels of accuracy when provided with the correct legal texts, they are not yet at expert tax lawyer levels. The advancement of LLMs could have significant implications for the legal profession and AI governance as they continue to improve their ability to reason about law autonomously. Several related studies have been conducted on language models including research on discovering distributional differences through language descriptions, improving science question-answering through supervised reasoning processes, active prompting with chain-of-thought for large language models, scalable prompt generation for semi-supervised learning with language models, using language models for computer tasks, measuring and narrowing the compositionality gap in language models, synergizing reasoning and acting in language models (ReAct), exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment, bounding the capabilities of large language models in open text generation with prompt constraints. Other studies focus on augmented language models through surveys or specific applications such as generating code by retrieving documentation (DocPrompting), improving large language models with external knowledge and automated feedback, learning to play Atari games with the help of instruction manuals (Read and Reap the Rewards), open-domain question answering techniques. There are also studies on recitation-augmented language models (Recitation-Augmented Language Models), composing retrieval and language models for knowledge-intensive NLP (Demonstrate-Search-Predict), compositional exemplars for in-context learning, and in-context retrieval-augmented language models. Overall these studies highlight the potential of LLMs in various applications and demonstrate a need to further explore their capabilities and limitations. The advancements made so far show promise towards revolutionizing the legal profession and AI governance but there is still progress needed before they can match human professionals' expertise.
- - Large Language Models (LLMs) can contribute to improving legal services, AI governance, and identifying inconsistencies in tax law.
- - Tax law was chosen as the focus for experiments due to its relevance and the ability to set up automated validation pipelines.
- - LLMs have emerging legal understanding capabilities, with improved performance in each subsequent model release by OpenAI.
- - Providing additional legal context and using few-shot prompting techniques enhances the performance of LLMs.
- - LLMs can perform at high levels of accuracy when provided with correct legal texts but are not yet at expert tax lawyer levels.
- - Advancements in LLMs could have significant implications for the legal profession and AI governance.
- - Other studies highlight various applications of LLMs, such as generating code, improving models with external knowledge, and open-domain question answering techniques.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are advanced computer programs that can help improve legal services, AI governance, and find mistakes in tax laws. Tax law was chosen for experiments because it is important and can be checked automatically. LLMs are getting better at understanding the law with each new version released by OpenAI. Giving more legal information and using special techniques can make LLMs work even better. While LLMs can be very accurate when given the right legal texts, they are not as good as expert tax lawyers yet. Improvements in LLMs could have big effects on the legal profession and how AI is controlled. Other studies show that LLMs can also write code, learn from outside knowledge, and answer questions about anything."
Definitions
- Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that understand and use language to perform tasks.
- Legal services: Help and advice related to the law.
- AI governance: The rules and systems for controlling artificial intelligence.
- Tax law: The set of rules about taxes that people must follow.
- Automated validation pipelines: Automatic processes for checking if something is correct or not.
- Emerging legal understanding capabilities: The ability of LLMs to understand the law as they develop.
- Performance: How well something works or does its job.
- Legal context: Additional information about the law that helps understand a situation better.
- Few-shot prompting techniques: Special ways of giving instructions to LLMs to make them work better with less information.
Exploring the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tax Law
Large language models (LLMs) have been gaining traction as a powerful tool for natural language processing (NLP). Recent research has explored their capabilities in applying tax law and how it can contribute to improving legal services, AI governance, and identifying inconsistencies in the law. This article will discuss the findings of this research paper and its implications for the legal profession and AI governance.
Background
The authors chose tax law as their focus because it allows them to set up automated validation pipelines, requires logical reasoning and math skills, and is relevant to the real-world economic lives of citizens and companies. Through experiments, they demonstrate that LLMs have emerging legal understanding capabilities, with improved performance in each subsequent model release by OpenAI. They also find that providing additional legal context to LLMs enhances their performance, particularly when combined with few-shot prompting techniques. However, while LLMs can perform at high levels of accuracy when provided with the correct legal texts, they are not yet at expert tax lawyer levels.
Related Studies
Several related studies have been conducted on language models including research on discovering distributional differences through language descriptions; improving science question-answering through supervised reasoning processes; active prompting with chain-of-thought for large language models; scalable prompt generation for semi-supervised learning with language models; using language models for computer tasks; measuring and narrowing the compositionality gap in language models; synergizing reasoning and acting in language models (ReAct); exploring language models as accounts of human moral judgment; bounding the capabilities of large language models in open text generation with prompt constraints; augmented language model surveys or specific applications such as generating code by retrieving documentation (DocPrompting); improving large language models with external knowledge and automated feedback; learning to play Atari games with help from instruction manuals (Read & Reap Rewards); open domain question answering techniques; recitation-augmented LM’s (Recitation Augmented Language Models); composing retrieval & LMs for knowledge intensive NLP tasks (Demonstrate Search Predict); compositional exemplars for in context learning & retrieval augmented LMs.
Overall these studies highlight the potential of LLMs in various applications but there is still progress needed before they can match human professionals' expertise. The advancements made so far show promise towards revolutionizing the legal profession and AI governance but further exploration into their capabilities is necessary before any definitive conclusions can be drawn about their effectiveness compared to human experts.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that LLM's are capable of performing at high levels when provided with appropriate contexts but are not yet able to match expert tax lawyer levels yet due to lack of experience or training data sets available which could limit its application potentials within certain domains like law enforcement or medical diagnosis where accuracy matters most . Further exploration into their capabilities is necessary before any definitive conclusions can be drawn about their effectiveness compared to human experts however advancements made thus far show promise towards revolutionizing both fields if utilized correctly