Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2306.17563v1

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on various natural language tasks. However, they have limited success in the text ranking problem compared to well-trained baseline rankers. Existing methods struggle to outperform these baseline rankers, and the only exception is a recent approach that relies on a blackbox commercial system. In this paper, the authors propose a new technique called Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) to address this issue. The authors analyze the pointwise and listwise ranking prompts used by existing methods and argue that LLMs do not fully understand these ranking formulations due to their training process. Pointwise approaches require LLMs to output calibrated prediction probabilities before sorting, which is challenging for them. Listwise approaches also generate conflicting or useless outputs on moderate-sized LLMs. To overcome these limitations, the authors introduce PRP as a way to reduce the burden on LLMs. They achieve state-of-the-art ranking performance on standard benchmarks using moderate-sized open-sourced LLMs. On TREC-DL2020, PRP outperforms previous approaches based on larger models by over 5% at NDCG@1. On TREC-DL2019, PRP outperforms other existing solutions by over 10% for nearly all ranking metrics. The authors also propose several variants of PRP to improve efficiency and show that competitive results can be achieved even with linear complexity. Additionally, they highlight other benefits of PRP such as supporting both generation and scoring LLM APIs and being insensitive to input ordering. Overall, this paper presents a novel technique, PRP which significantly improves text ranking performance using moderate-sized LLMs. The results demonstrate its effectiveness in outperforming existing methods and achieving state-of-the-art performance on benchmark datasets.

• - Large Language Models (LLMs) have limited success in text ranking compared to baseline rankers
• - Existing methods struggle to outperform baseline rankers, except for a recent approach using a blackbox commercial system
• - The authors propose Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) as a new technique to address this issue
• - LLMs do not fully understand pointwise and listwise ranking prompts due to their training process
• - PRP reduces the burden on LLMs by introducing a new approach
• - PRP achieves state-of-the-art ranking performance on standard benchmarks using moderate-sized open-sourced LLMs
• - PRP outperforms previous approaches based on larger models by over 5% at NDCG@1 and other existing solutions by over 10% for nearly all ranking metrics
• - Several variants of PRP are proposed to improve efficiency with competitive results even with linear complexity
• - PRP has additional benefits such as supporting both generation and scoring LLM APIs and being insensitive to input ordering.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are computer programs that can understand and generate human-like text. They are not very good at ranking or organizing text compared to other methods. There have been attempts to improve LLMs for ranking, but they haven't been very successful except for one recent approach using a commercial system. The authors of the study propose a new technique called Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) to help LLMs rank text better. LLMs don't fully understand certain types of ranking prompts because of how they are trained. PRP makes it easier for LLMs to rank text by introducing a new approach. PRP performs better than previous methods on standard tests, even with smaller LLMs. PRP is also more efficient and has additional benefits like supporting both generating and scoring text, and being able to handle different orders of input."

Exploring the Benefits of Pairwise Ranking Prompting for Large Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their impressive performance on various natural language tasks. However, they have limited success in text ranking problems compared to well-trained baseline rankers. Existing methods struggle to outperform these baseline rankers, and the only exception is a recent approach that relies on a blackbox commercial system. In this paper, the authors propose a new technique called Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) which significantly improves text ranking performance using moderate-sized LLMs.

Background

Text ranking is an important task in natural language processing (NLP). It involves sorting documents according to relevance scores given by a model or system. Traditional approaches such as pointwise and listwise methods are commonly used for this purpose. Pointwise approaches require models to output calibrated prediction probabilities before sorting, while listwise approaches generate conflicting or useless outputs on moderate-sized LLMs.

The Proposed Method: PRP

To overcome these limitations, the authors introduce PRP as a way to reduce the burden on LLMs when performing text ranking tasks. The main idea behind PRP is that it uses pairwise comparisons between documents instead of relying solely on calibration probabilities or list ordering from LLMs. This allows for more efficient training and better results than existing methods based on larger models by over 5% at NDCG@1 according to TREC-DL2020 results reported in the paper. On TREC-DL2019, PRP also outperformed other existing solutions by over 10% for nearly all ranking metrics tested in the paper's experiments section.

Variants of PRP

The authors also proposed several variants of PRP which improve efficiency and show that competitive results can be achieved even with linear complexity algorithms such as RankNet and LambdaRank which are used in many modern search engines today such as Google Search and Bing Search respectively . Additionally, they highlight other benefits of PRP such as supporting both generation and scoring LLM APIs and being insensitive to input ordering which makes it easier for developers who use large language models for their applications since they don't need to worry about reordering inputs every time they make changes or updates .

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents a novel technique called Pairwise Ranking Prompting (PRP) which significantly improves text ranking performance using moderate-sized LLMs compared to traditional pointwise and list wise methods used previously . The results demonstrate its effectiveness in outperforming existing methods with state-of-the art performance on benchmark datasets like TREC DL 2020 & 2019 . Additionally , its ability support both generation & scoring API’s along with being insensitive towards input orderings makes it easier for developers who use large language models within their applications .