Automated Deception Detection from Videos: Using End-to-End Learning Based High-Level Features and Classification Approaches
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Deception detection is a multidisciplinary field attracting researchers from various disciplines
- The study proposes a multimodal approach combining deep learning and discriminative models for automated deception detection from videos
- Video modalities are used to analyze gaze, head pose, and facial expressions using convolutional end-to-end learning
- The approach yields promising results compared to state-of-the-art methods
- Discriminative models are employed due to limited training data, outperforming sequence-to-class approaches
- Experiments are conducted on five datasets, including a new Rolling-Dice Experiment motivated by economic factors
- Facial expressions are found to be more effective than gaze and head pose in detecting deception
- Combining multiple modalities with feature selection enhances overall detection performance
- Scenario-specific training data and contextual factors influence deceptive behavior
- Differences in expressed features across datasets support the findings
- Cross-dataset experiments reinforce the effectiveness of the proposed approach
- Deception detection performance exceeds chance levels even with low-stake datasets like the Rolling-Dice Experiment
- Automating deception detection from video modalities holds significant potential
Authors: Laslo Dinges (Neuro-Information Technology Group, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Marc-André Fiedler (Neuro-Information Technology Group, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Ayoub Al-Hamadi (Neuro-Information Technology Group, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Thorsten Hempel (Neuro-Information Technology Group, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Ahmed Abdelrahman (Neuro-Information Technology Group, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Joachim Weimann (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg), Dmitri Bershadskyy (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg)
Abstract: Deception detection is an interdisciplinary field attracting researchers from psychology, criminology, computer science, and economics. We propose a multimodal approach combining deep learning and discriminative models for automated deception detection. Using video modalities, we employ convolutional end-to-end learning to analyze gaze, head pose, and facial expressions, achieving promising results compared to state-of-the-art methods. Due to limited training data, we also utilize discriminative models for deception detection. Although sequence-to-class approaches are explored, discriminative models outperform them due to data scarcity. Our approach is evaluated on five datasets, including a new Rolling-Dice Experiment motivated by economic factors. Results indicate that facial expressions outperform gaze and head pose, and combining modalities with feature selection enhances detection performance. Differences in expressed features across datasets emphasize the importance of scenario-specific training data and the influence of context on deceptive behavior. Cross-dataset experiments reinforce these findings. Despite the challenges posed by low-stake datasets, including the Rolling-Dice Experiment, deception detection performance exceeds chance levels. Our proposed multimodal approach and comprehensive evaluation shed light on the potential of automating deception detection from video modalities, opening avenues for future research.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.