Ethics in the Age of AI: An Analysis of AI Practitioners' Awareness and Challenges

AI-generated keywords: AI ethics AI practitioners fairness transparency accountability

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Ethics in AI has sparked debates among the public and experts
  • Understanding the perspective of AI practitioners is crucial
  • A survey was conducted to explore AI practitioners' awareness of AI ethics and challenges
  • Majority of practitioners had reasonable familiarity with AI ethics, primarily due to workplace rules and policies
  • Privacy protection and security were widely recognized ethical principles
  • Formal education and training were somewhat helpful in preparing practitioners for incorporating AI ethics into their work
  • Challenges faced by AI practitioners can be categorized into general, technology-related, and human-related challenges
  • These challenges include ensuring fairness and transparency in algorithms, addressing biases in data collection, managing accountability for system outcomes, navigating legal frameworks, and considering societal impacts
  • Several areas require further investigation to enhance the incorporation of ethics into AI development
  • Recommendations were provided to assist individual practitioners and companies in addressing these challenges effectively
  • Understanding the perspectives of AI practitioners is essential for responsible development practices that prioritize ethical considerations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Aastha Pant, Rashina Hoda, Simone V. Spiegler, Chakkrit Tantithamthavorn, Burak Turhan

36 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: Ethics in AI has become a debated topic of public and expert discourse in recent years. But what do people who build AI - AI practitioners - have to say about their understanding of AI ethics and the challenges associated with incorporating it in the AI-based systems they develop? Understanding AI practitioners' views on AI ethics is important as they are the ones closest to the AI systems and can bring about changes and improvements. We conducted a survey aimed at understanding AI practitioners' awareness of AI ethics and their challenges in incorporating ethics. Based on 100 AI practitioners' responses, our findings indicate that majority of AI practitioners had a reasonable familiarity with the concept of AI ethics, primarily due to workplace rules and policies. Privacy protection and security was the ethical principle that majority of them were aware of. Formal education/training was considered somewhat helpful in preparing practitioners to incorporate AI ethics. The challenges that AI practitioners faced in the development of ethical AI-based systems included (i) general challenges, (ii) technology-related challenges and (iii) human-related challenges. We also identified areas needing further investigation and provided recommendations to assist AI practitioners and companies in incorporating ethics into AI development.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Jul. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.10057v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In recent years, the topic of ethics in AI has sparked debates among the public and experts alike. It is crucial to understand the perspective of those who actually build AI systems - AI practitioners - and their understanding of AI ethics and the challenges associated with incorporating ethical principles into their work. To gain insights into this, a survey was conducted to explore AI practitioners' awareness of AI ethics and the difficulties they face in integrating ethics into their AI-based systems. The survey collected responses from 100 AI practitioners, revealing that a majority had a reasonable familiarity with the concept of AI ethics. This familiarity was primarily attributed to workplace rules and policies. Among the ethical principles, privacy protection and security were found to be widely recognized by most practitioners. Additionally, formal education and training were considered somewhat helpful in preparing practitioners to incorporate AI ethics into their work. The challenges faced by AI practitioners in developing ethical AI-based systems can be categorized into three main areas: general challenges, technology-related challenges, and human-related challenges. These challenges encompass various aspects such as ensuring fairness and transparency in algorithms, addressing biases in data collection and processing, managing accountability for system outcomes, navigating legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as considering societal impacts. Furthermore, the study identified several areas that require further investigation to enhance the incorporation of ethics into AI development. Recommendations were provided to assist both individual practitioners and companies in addressing these challenges effectively. Overall, understanding the perspectives of AI practitioners on AI ethics is essential because they are at the forefront of developing these systems and have potential to drive positive changes and improvements. By recognizing their awareness levels, identifying challenges they face, conducting further research in relevant areas, implementing recommended practices; we can foster responsible development practices that prioritize ethical considerations in all stages of an AI system's development.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.