Linear Convergence of Black-Box Variational Inference: Should We Stick the Landing?

Authors: Kyurae Kim, Yian Ma, Jacob R. Gardner

AI-generated keywords: BBVI STL Variational Inference Gradient Variance Convergence

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates achieves geometric convergence under perfect variational family specification
  • Quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator extends to misspecified variational families
  • Convergence of BBVI using projected stochastic gradient descent is implied by the quadratic variance condition
  • Analysis of regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators is improved upon and compared to the STL estimator
  • Explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees are provided for both methods
  • Contributes to understanding of BBVI and its convergence properties, offering insights into gradient variance bounds
  • Provides valuable guidance for practitioners working with variational inference methods
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: We prove that black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates, particularly the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator, converges at a geometric (traditionally called "linear") rate under perfect variational family specification. In particular, we prove a quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the STL estimator, one which encompasses misspecified variational families. Combined with previous works on the quadratic variance condition, this directly implies convergence of BBVI with the use of projected stochastic gradient descent. We also improve existing analysis on the regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators, which enables comparison against the STL estimator and provides explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees for both.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Jul. 2023

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.14642v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
This paper presents a proof that black-box variational inference (BBVI) with control variates, specifically the sticking-the-landing (STL) estimator, achieves geometric convergence under perfect variational family specification. The authors establish a quadratic bound on the gradient variance of the STL estimator which extends to encompass misspecified variational families. This result combined with previous research on the quadratic variance condition implies the convergence of BBVI when using projected stochastic gradient descent. Additionally, this study improves upon existing analysis of regular closed-form entropy gradient estimators and enables a comparison between these estimators and the STL estimator while providing explicit non-asymptotic complexity guarantees for both methods. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding of BBVI and its convergence properties by demonstrating geometric convergence under certain conditions and offering insights into gradient variance bounds. These theoretical foundations provide valuable guidance for practitioners working with variational inference methods.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.