Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2307.15043v1

In their paper titled "Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models," authors Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, J. Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson address the issue of objectionable content generated by large language models (LLMs). While efforts have been made to align these models to prevent undesirable outputs, previous attacks against LLMs have required significant human ingenuity and are not practical in real-world scenarios. To tackle this problem, the authors propose a simple yet effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Their approach involves finding a suffix that can be attached to various queries for an LLM, aiming to maximize the probability of the model producing an affirmative response instead of refusing to answer. Unlike manual engineering approaches, their method automatically generates these adversarial suffixes using a combination of greedy and gradient-based search techniques, improving upon past automatic prompt generation methods. Surprisingly, the authors find that the adversarial prompts generated by their approach are highly transferable even to black-box publicly released LLMs. They train an adversarial attack suffix on multiple prompts asking for different types of objectionable content and multiple models such as Vicuna-7B and 13B. The resulting attack suffix successfully induces objectionable content in public interfaces like ChatGPT, Bard, Claude, as well as open-source LLMs including LLaMA-2-Chat, Pythia, Falcon among others. This work significantly advances the state-of-the-art in adversarial attacks against aligned language models and raises important questions about preventing such systems from generating objectionable information. The authors provide code for their approach at github.com/llm-attacks/llm-attacks.

• - Authors propose a simple yet effective attack method for generating objectionable behaviors in large language models (LLMs)
• - Approach involves finding a suffix that maximizes the probability of an affirmative response instead of refusing to answer
• - Adversarial prompts generated by their approach are highly transferable even to black-box publicly released LLMs
• - Attack suffix successfully induces objectionable content in various public interfaces and open-source LLMs
• - This work advances the state-of-the-art in adversarial attacks against aligned language models
• - Raises important questions about preventing LLMs from generating objectionable information
• - Code for the approach is available at github.com/llm-attacks/llm-attacks

Authors propose a way to make computers say bad things using words. They found a special ending for sentences that makes the computer more likely to say yes instead of no. The bad words can be used on different types of computers, even ones that are not owned by the authors. This is a new and improved way to make computers say bad things. It also makes us think about how we can stop computers from saying bad things. You can find the instructions for this on a website called github.com/llm-attacks/llm-attacks. Definitions- Authors: People who wrote the article or book - Objectionable: Something that is not good or appropriate - Language models: Computers that understand and use language - Affirmative response: Saying yes or agreeing with something - Refusing: Saying no or disagreeing with something - Adversarial prompts: Words or sentences used to trick or confuse the computer - Transferable: Can be used in different situations or on different computers - Black-box publicly released LLMs: Computers made by someone else that anyone can use but don't know how they work exactly

Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models

Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly popular in recent years due to their ability to generate natural-sounding text. However, these models can also produce objectionable content when given certain inputs. To address this issue, researchers have developed methods for aligning LLMs so that they are less likely to generate such responses. Despite these efforts, previous attacks against LLMs have required significant human ingenuity and are not practical in real-world scenarios. In their paper titled "Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models," authors Andy Zou, Zifan Wang, J. Zico Kolter, and Matt Fredrikson propose a simple yet effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Their approach involves finding a suffix that can be attached to various queries for an LLM with the aim of maximizing the probability of the model producing an affirmative response instead of refusing to answer. Unlike manual engineering approaches, their method automatically generates these adversarial suffixes using a combination of greedy and gradient-based search techniques, improving upon past automatic prompt generation methods. Surprisingly, the authors find that the adversarial prompts generated by their approach are highly transferable even to black-box publicly released LLMs. They train an adversarial attack suffix on multiple prompts asking for different types of objectionable content and multiple models such as Vicuna-7B and 13B. The resulting attack suffix successfully induces objectionable content in public interfaces like ChatGPT, Bard, Claude as well as open-source LLMs including LLaMA-2-Chat, Pythia Falcon among others. This work significantly advances the state-of-the art in adversarial attacks against aligned language models and raises important questions about preventing such systems from generating undesirable information or outputs. The authors provide code for their approach at github/llmattacks/llmattacks which allows users to replicate their results easily without needing any prior knowledge or expertise in programming or machine learning algorithms used in this research paper . This makes it easier for other researchers interested in studying this topic further or developing more secure versions of large language models which cannot be attacked using similar techniques proposed by the authors . Overall , this research paper provides valuable insights into how current large language models can be vulnerable against automated attacks which could potentially lead them towards generating offensive or inappropriate outputs . The findings presented by this study could help inform future development efforts aimed at creating more robust versions of large language models which are resistant against such malicious attempts .