Enhanced Sub-kpc Scale Star-formation: Results From A JWST Size Analysis of 339 Galaxies At 5<z<14

AI-generated keywords: High-redshift galaxies JWST Size-stellar mass relation Star formation surface density Inside-out galaxy formation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Comprehensive search and analysis of high-redshift galaxies using JWST data
  • 339 galaxies identified at redshifts ranging from 5 to 14
  • Regression analysis reveals a power-law scaling relation between UV size and stellar mass
  • Slower rate of average size evolution compared to previous studies, suggesting limited growth in physical sizes over time
  • Approximately 13% of the sample consists of marginally resolved sources with sizes smaller than 100 parsecs, exhibiting high star formation surface densities
  • No evidence of ongoing supermassive black hole accretion found, but high shock velocities within intense star forming regions could explain observed ratios
  • Rest frame UV and optical sizes are comparable, indicating early galaxies building up their structures inside out.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Takahiro Morishita, Massimo Stiavelli, Ranga-Ram Chary, Michele Trenti, Pietro Bergamini, Marco Chiaberge, Nicha Leethochawalit, Guido Roberts-Borsani, Xuejian Shen, Tommaso Treu

arXiv: 2308.05018v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
Submitted to ApJ
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We present a comprehensive search and analysis of high-redshift galaxies in a suite of nine public JWST extragalactic fields taken in Cycle 1, covering a total effective search area of $\sim358{\rm arcmin^2}$. Through conservative ($8\sigma$) photometric selection, we identify 339 galaxies at $5<z<14$, with 109 having spectroscopic redshift measurements from the literature, including recent JWST NIRSpec observations. Our regression analysis reveals that the rest-frame UV size-stellar mass relation follows $R_{\rm eff}\propto M_*^{0.20\pm0.03}$, similar to that of star-forming galaxies at $z\sim3$, but scaled down in size by $\sim0.7$dex. We find a much slower rate for the average size evolution over the redshift range, $R_{\rm eff}\propto(1+z)^{-0.4\pm0.2}$, than that derived in the literature. A fraction ($\sim13\,\%$) of our sample are marginally resolved even in the NIRCam imaging ($<100$pc), located at $>1.5\,\sigma$ below the derived size-mass slope. These compact sources exhibit a high star formation surface density $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}>10\,M_\odot\,{\rm yr^{-1}\,kpc^{-2}}$, a range in which only $<0.01\,\%$ of the local star-forming galaxy sample is found. For those with available NIRSpec data, no evidence of ongoing supermassive black hole accretion is observed. A potential explanation for the observed high [OIII]-to-Hbeta ratios could be high shock velocities, likely originating within intense star-forming regions characterized by high $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$. Lastly, we find that the rest-frame UV and optical sizes of our sample are comparable. Our results are consistent with these early galaxies building up their structures inside-out and yet to exhibit the strong color gradient seen at lower redshift.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.05018v1

In this study, the authors present a comprehensive search and analysis of high-redshift galaxies using data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST). They focus on nine public JWST extragalactic fields taken in Cycle 1, covering a total effective search area of approximately 358 square arcminutes. Through conservative photometric selection, they identify 339 galaxies at redshifts ranging from 5 to 14. Of these identified galaxies, 109 have spectroscopic redshift measurements from the literature, including recent observations with JWST's Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec). The authors perform a regression analysis and find that the rest-frame UV size-stellar mass relation follows a power-law scaling relation of $R_{\rm eff}\propto M_*^{0.20\pm0.03}$. This is similar to the size-stellar mass relation observed for star-forming galaxies at around redshift 3 but scaled down in size by approximately 0.7 dex. The study also investigates the evolution of galaxy sizes over the redshift range studied. The authors find that there is a much slower rate of average size evolution compared to previous studies, with an evolution rate of $R_{\rm eff}\propto(1+z)^{-0.4\pm0.2}$. This result suggests that high-redshift galaxies may not undergo significant growth in their physical sizes over time. Interestingly, a fraction (approximately 13%) of the sample consists of marginally resolved sources even in the NIRCam imaging, with sizes smaller than 100 parsecs. These compact sources deviate from the derived size-mass slope and exhibit high star formation surface densities ($\Sigma_{\rm SFR}>10\ M_\odot \ {\rm yr^{−1}\ kpc^{−2}}$). Such high density star forming regions are extremely rare in local star forming galaxies, accounting for less than 0.01% of the sample. The authors also investigate the presence of ongoing supermassive black hole accretion in the observed galaxies. For those with available NIRSpec data, no evidence of such accretion is found; however, they suggest that high shock velocities within intense star forming regions characterized by high $\Sigma_{\rm SFR}$ could explain the observed high [OIII]-to-Hbeta ratios. Additionally, they find that rest frame UV and optical sizes are comparable for their sample which is consistent with early galaxies building up their structures inside out and not yet exhibiting strong color gradients seen at lower redshifts.
Created on 07 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.