In this study, the authors compared three different models for the growth of tomato plants in greenhouses: the SIMPLE model, the reduced TOMGRO model, and the DSSAT model. The goal was to determine which model is most suitable for optimal control (OC) approaches in greenhouse farming. The results showed that all three models had similar yield predictions and accuracy under standard weather and greenhouse conditions. However, due to implementation limitations, only two models (TOMGRO and SIMPLE) were applicable for optimal control. To evaluate the usability of TOMGRO and SIMPLE in an OC approach, both models were combined with the same greenhouse model. The optimization results revealed that the models have different sensitivities to environmental variables, highlighting the importance of careful calibration. The SIMPLE model demonstrated a faster computation time, making it more attractive for closed-loop control systems. On the other hand, the TOMGRO model achieved a higher overall yield but uncertainty remained about which model is closer to reality. Despite their strengths and weaknesses, both models are relevant for closed-loop applications. The SIMPLE model's adaptability to other crops makes it particularly useful; however challenges associated with obtaining states need to be overcome before using it in a closed-loop control system. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into selecting appropriate crop growth models for optimal control in greenhouse farming. Further research is needed to improve parameter identification and calibration tailored specifically to greenhouses so that farmers can make informed decisions on which crop growth model is best suited for their needs.
- - Three models compared: SIMPLE, reduced TOMGRO, and DSSAT
- - Goal: Determine most suitable model for optimal control in greenhouse farming
- - All three models had similar yield predictions and accuracy under standard conditions
- - Only TOMGRO and SIMPLE applicable for optimal control due to implementation limitations
- - TOMGRO and SIMPLE combined with same greenhouse model for evaluation
- - Models have different sensitivities to environmental variables, highlighting importance of calibration
- - SIMPLE has faster computation time, making it attractive for closed-loop control systems
- - TOMGRO achieved higher overall yield but uncertainty remains about closeness to reality
- - Both models relevant for closed-loop applications; SIMPLE adaptable to other crops
- - Challenges associated with obtaining states need to be overcome for using SIMPLE in closed-loop system
- - Study provides insights into selecting appropriate crop growth models for optimal control in greenhouse farming
Three different models were compared: SIMPLE, reduced TOMGRO, and DSSAT. A model is a way to represent something in a simplified way. The goal was to find the best model for controlling greenhouse farming. Yield predictions and accuracy were similar for all three models under normal conditions. Only TOMGRO and SIMPLE could be used for optimal control because of some limitations in implementing the other model. TOMGRO and SIMPLE were tested together using the same greenhouse model. The models react differently to changes in the environment, so it's important to adjust them correctly. SIMPLE is faster at calculating things, which makes it good for controlling systems in greenhouses that need quick decisions. TOMGRO had higher overall yield, but we're not sure how close it is to reality. Both models are useful for controlling systems in greenhouses, but SIMPLE can also work with other crops. There are some challenges with getting certain information needed for using SIMPLE in a controlling system. This study helps us know which model is best for controlling greenhouse farming."
Optimal Control in Greenhouse Farming: Comparing Three Different Crop Growth Models
Greenhouses are an important part of modern agriculture, allowing farmers to grow crops in a controlled environment regardless of the season or weather. To maximize crop yields and optimize resource use, it is essential for greenhouse farmers to have access to reliable models that accurately predict crop growth. In this study, three different models were compared for their suitability in optimal control (OC) approaches: the SIMPLE model, the reduced TOMGRO model, and the DSSAT model.
Comparing Yield Predictions and Accuracy
The authors evaluated all three models under standard weather and greenhouse conditions to compare their yield predictions and accuracy. The results showed that all three models had similar performance with respect to yield prediction and accuracy. However, due to implementation limitations only two of these models (TOMGRO and SIMPLE) were applicable for OC applications.
Evaluating Usability for Optimal Control
To evaluate how suitable TOMGRO and SIMPLE are for OC applications, both models were combined with the same greenhouse model. The optimization results revealed that each model has different sensitivities when exposed to environmental variables such as temperature or light intensity; thus highlighting the importance of careful calibration before using either one of them in a closed-loop control system.
Pros & Cons Of Each Model
The SIMPLE model demonstrated a faster computation time than TOMGRO making it more attractive for closed-loop control systems; however uncertainty remained about which one is closer to reality since no clear winner emerged from comparing their yield predictions under standard conditions. On the other hand, TOMGRO achieved a higher overall yield but was more computationally expensive than SIMPLE due its complexity when exposed to environmental variables such as temperature or light intensity changes over time. Despite their strengths and weaknesses both models are relevant for closed-loop applications given their ability to predict yields accurately under standard conditions while also being able respond quickly enough when used in a closed-loop system like those found in greenhouses today.
Adaptability To Other Crops & Challenges Associated With Obtaining States
The adaptability of SIMPLE makes it particularly useful since it can be applied across multiple crops; however challenges associated with obtaining states need to be overcome before using it in a closed-loop control system such as those found in greenhouses today where accurate data on soil moisture levels is hard come by due its dynamic nature over time especially during periods of high temperatures or humidity changes inside greenhouses which can affect plant growth significantly if not monitored closely enough by growers themselves .
Conclusion & Further Research Needed
Overall this study provides valuable insights into selecting appropriate crop growth models for optimal control based on specific needs such as computational speed or accuracy depending on what type of application they will be used within greenhouses today . Further research is needed though specifically tailored towards parameter identification , calibration ,and validation so that farmers can make informed decisions on which crop growth model is best suited for their needs given certain constraints like cost , availability etc..