Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2304.02338v1

This paper proposes a framework for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty using mixed-integer programming. Despite recent methodological advances, modeling endogenous uncertainty remains challenging due to limitations in modeling capabilities and computational requirements. The proposed framework, called Decision Programming, uses influence diagrams to represent decision problems and formulates them as mixed-integer linear programming problems that can be solved using off-the-shelf mathematical optimization solvers. This paper focuses on the type of endogenous uncertainty that received less attention in the introduction of Decision Programming: conditionally observed information. To address this issue, the authors incorporate conditional non-anticipativity constraints (C-NACs) into Decision Programming models, which are used in multi-stage stochastic programming (MSSP) models to represent such uncertainties. This allows for simultaneous consideration of the two main types of endogenous uncertainty: decision-dependent information structure and decision-dependent probability distribution. Additionally, the authors present a decomposition approach that enables considering continuous decision variables in certain parts of the problem where the original formulation was restricted to discrete variables only. The extended framework is illustrated with two example problems: an illustrative multiperiod game and a large-scale cost-benefit problem regarding climate change mitigation. Neither of these example problems could be solved with existing frameworks. The contributions of this paper include two different modeling approaches for considering conditionally observed information and a subdiagram decomposition approach to improve computational efficiency. According to Hellemo et al., Type 3 endogenously uncertain stochastic programming (T3ESP) problems have not been discussed in literature before, making this framework particularly valuable for capacity expansion contexts. In practice, both approaches have their advantages and disadvantages. Adding observation nodes only requires modifying the influence diagram by adding new nodes but may result in larger problem sizes, while C-NAC constraints require additional computations but may lead to smaller problem sizes. Computational experiments show similar solution times for both approaches but suggest that C-NAC constraints may be more suitable for problems with decision-dependent probability distributions. Overall, the proposed framework provides a valuable tool for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty and has the potential to address challenging modeling and computational issues in various contexts.

• - The paper proposes a framework called Decision Programming for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty using mixed-integer programming.
• - The framework uses influence diagrams to represent decision problems and formulates them as mixed-integer linear programming problems that can be solved using off-the-shelf mathematical optimization solvers.
• - The authors incorporate conditional non-anticipativity constraints (C-NACs) into Decision Programming models to address conditionally observed information, which is a type of endogenous uncertainty that received less attention in the introduction of Decision Programming.
• - The extended framework allows for simultaneous consideration of the two main types of endogenous uncertainty: decision-dependent information structure and decision-dependent probability distribution.
• - A decomposition approach is presented that enables considering continuous decision variables in certain parts of the problem where the original formulation was restricted to discrete variables only.
• - Two example problems are illustrated: an illustrative multiperiod game and a large-scale cost-benefit problem regarding climate change mitigation. Neither of these example problems could be solved with existing frameworks.
• - The contributions of this paper include two different modeling approaches for considering conditionally observed information and a subdiagram decomposition approach to improve computational efficiency.
• - According to Hellemo et al., Type 3 endogenously uncertain stochastic programming (T3ESP) problems have not been discussed in literature before, making this framework particularly valuable for capacity expansion contexts.
• - Computational experiments show similar solution times for both approaches but suggest that C-NAC constraints may be more suitable for problems with decision-dependent probability distributions.
• - Overall, the proposed framework provides a valuable tool for solving decision problems with endogenous uncertainty and has the potential to address challenging modeling and computational issues in various contexts.

This paper talks about a new way to solve problems where we don't know everything for sure. It's called Decision Programming and it uses math to help us make the best decisions. The authors made some improvements to this method so that it can handle even more types of uncertain information. They also found a way to use both whole numbers and decimals in their calculations. They tested this method on two big problems and it worked really well! This is an important tool for solving difficult problems when we don't have all the answers. Definitions- Framework: a basic structure or plan that helps organize ideas - Endogenous uncertainty: situations where we don't know everything for sure, but our own decisions can affect what happens next - Mixed-integer programming: using math to find the best solution when some of the variables are whole numbers and others are decimals - Linear programming: using math to find the best solution when there are limits or constraints on what we can do - Computational efficiency: how quickly a computer program can solve a problem

Decision Programming: A Framework for Solving Decision Problems with Endogenous Uncertainty

In recent years, decision-making has become increasingly complex due to the presence of endogenous uncertainty. This type of uncertainty arises when decisions made by a decision maker affect the information available at later stages in the problem. Traditional methods such as multi-stage stochastic programming (MSSP) and influence diagrams have been used to address this challenge, but they are limited in their ability to model and solve these types of problems. To address this issue, Hellemo et al. propose a new framework called Decision Programming that uses mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models and influence diagrams to represent decision problems with endogenous uncertainty.

Background on Endogenous Uncertainty

Endogenous uncertainty is an important concept in decision making because it affects how decisions are made over time. It can be divided into two main categories: decision-dependent information structure and decision-dependent probability distribution. In the former case, decisions made by a decision maker may change what information is available at future stages; while in the latter case, decisions may also affect the probability distributions associated with future events or outcomes. These two types of uncertainties can lead to different modeling approaches depending on which one is more relevant for a given problem context.

The Proposed Framework

The proposed framework combines MILP models and influence diagrams to represent endogenously uncertain problems as Type 3 endogenously uncertain stochastic programming (T3ESP) problems which have not been discussed in literature before according to Hellemo et al.. The authors present two different modeling approaches for considering conditionally observed information: adding observation nodes or using conditional non-anticipativity constraints (C-NACs). Additionally, they introduce a subdiagram decomposition approach that enables considering continuous variables where the original formulation was restricted only to discrete variables. This extended framework is illustrated with two example problems: an illustrative multiperiod game and a large-scale cost benefit problem regarding climate change mitigation – both of which could not be solved using existing frameworks prior to this paper’s publication.

Advantages & Disadvantages

Adding observation nodes only requires modifying the influence diagram by adding new nodes but may result in larger problem sizes; while C-NAC constraints require additional computations but may lead smaller problem sizes instead. Computational experiments show similar solution times for both approaches but suggest that C-NAC constraints may be more suitable for problems with decision dependent probability distributions due its potential efficiency gains compared to other methods such as MSSP models without C-NACs .

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents an innovative framework for solving T3ESP problems that combines MILP models and influence diagrams along with novel techniques such as subdiagram decomposition and conditional nonanticipativity constraints (C_NACs). This provides practitioners with valuable tools for addressing challenging modeling issues related to endogenous uncertainty while potentially improving computational efficiency compared traditional methods like MSSP models without C_NACs .