Rest-Frame Near-Infrared Radial Light Profiles up to z=3 from JWST/NIRCam: Wavelength Dependence of the Sérsic Index

AI-generated keywords: Radial light profiles

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study examines wavelength dependence of radial light profiles based on S\'ersic index $n$ measurements of 1067 galaxies
  • Sample includes galaxies with M$_*\geq$ 10$^{9.5}$M$_\odot$ and in the redshift range $0.5 < z < 3$
  • Rest-frame optical light profiles from CANDELS+3D-HST, rest-frame near-infrared light profiles inferred from CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging
  • S\'ersic index $n$ shows weak dependence on wavelength, regardless of redshift, galaxy mass, and type
  • Star-forming galaxies have $n = 1-1.5$, quiescent galaxies have $n = 3-4$ in rest-frame optical and near-infrared
  • Strong correlation between $n$ and star formation activity at all wavelengths, suggesting a physical connection between radial stellar mass profile and star formation activity
  • Current sample size too small to discern trends for most massive galaxies (M$_* > 10^{11}M_\odot$)
  • Project funded by European Research Council (ERC) under Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 683184), financial support from Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen), research project G030319N
  • Figure 2 provides comparison of NIRCam/F150W and HST/F160W S\'ersic indices retrieved in this work; HST/F160W already deep enough to recover S\'ersic indices properly despite being shallower than JWST/F150W
  • Study contributes to understanding wavelength dependence of radial light profiles in galaxies, emphasizes importance of considering both rest-frame optical and near-infrared observations
  • Results provide insights into connection between stellar mass distribution and star formation activity; further investigations with larger samples needed for more massive galaxies
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Marco Martorano, Arjen van der Wel, Eric F. Bell, Marijn Franx, Katherine E. Whitaker, Angelos Nersesian, Sedona H. Price, Maarten Baes, Katherine A. Suess, Erica J. Nelson, Tim B. Miller, Rachel Bezanson, Gabriel Brammer

arXiv: 2308.11392v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
15 pages, 7 figures, Submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We examine the wavelength dependence of radial light profiles based on S\'ersic index $n$ measurements of 1067 galaxies with M$_*\geq$ 10$^{9.5}$M$_\odot$ and in the redshift range $0.5 < z < 3$. The sample and rest-frame optical light profiles are drawn from CANDELS$+$3D-HST; rest-frame near-infrared light profiles are inferred from CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging. $n$ shows only weak dependence on wavelength, regardless of redshift, galaxy mass and type: on average, star-forming galaxies have $n = 1-1.5$ and quiescent galaxies have $n = 3-4$ in the rest-frame optical and near-infrared. The strong correlation at all wavelengths between $n$ and star-formation activity implies a physical connection between the radial stellar mass profile and star-formation activity. The main caveat is that the current sample is too small to discern trends for the most massive galaxies (M$_* > 10^{11}M_\odot$).

Submitted to arXiv on 22 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.11392v1

This study examines the wavelength dependence of radial light profiles based on S\'ersic index $n$ measurements of 1067 galaxies with M$_*\geq$ 10$^{9.5}$M$_\odot$ and in the redshift range $0.5 < z < 3$. The sample and rest-frame optical light profiles are drawn from CANDELS+3D-HST, while rest-frame near-infrared light profiles are inferred from CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging. The results show that the S\'ersic index $n$ exhibits only weak dependence on wavelength, regardless of redshift, galaxy mass, and type. On average, star-forming galaxies have $n = 1-1.5$, while quiescent galaxies have $n = 3-4$ in the rest-frame optical and near-infrared. The study also reveals a strong correlation between $n$ and star-formation activity at all wavelengths, suggesting a physical connection between the radial stellar mass profile and star formation activity. However, it is important to note that the current sample size is too small to discern trends for the most massive galaxies (M$_* > 10^{11}M_\odot$). The project has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 683184). The authors also acknowledge financial support from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO-Vlaanderen), research project G030319N. In addition to these findings, Figure 2 provides a comparison of NIRCam/F150W and HST/F160W S\'ersic indices retrieved in this work. Despite being shallower than JWST/F150W, HST/F160W was already deep enough to properly recover S\'ersic indices. Overall, this study contributes to our understanding of the wavelength dependence of radial light profiles in galaxies, highlighting the importance of considering both rest-frame optical and near-infrared observations. The results provide valuable insights into the connection between stellar mass distribution and star formation activity; however, further investigations with larger samples are needed to explore these trends in more massive galaxies.
Created on 07 Sep. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.