Modeling Dust Production, Growth, and Destruction in Reionization-Era Galaxies with the CROC Simulations II: Predicting the Dust Content of High-Redshift Galaxies
AI-generated Key Points
- Investigate interstellar dust content of galaxies during the reionization era
- Focus on galaxies with stellar masses ranging from $10^5$ to $10^9$ times the mass of our Sun within the first 1.2 billion years of the universe's existence
- Employ a post-processing method to model dust creation and destruction processes
- Determine if observable quantities related to dust in early galaxies can provide constraints on dust physics
- Use simulations to forward model observable properties and compare them to existing observational data
- None of the models can simultaneously match all existing observational constraints
- Models predicting larger amounts of dust with a ratio of dust mass to metallicity ($D/Z$) greater than or equal to 0.1 at redshift $z=5$ are preferred based on constraints related to total dust mass and infrared luminosities
- These models produce excessive extinction in the ultraviolet (UV), preventing them from matching observations of $\beta_{\rm UV}$
- Simulated distributions of stars and dust appear overly symmetric compared to existing data, likely due to limitations in their stellar feedback model
- Observable properties related to interstellar dust serve as a strong test for stellar feedback mechanisms in high-redshift galaxies
- Current simulations cannot reproduce observed dust masses and optical depths, suggesting a need for more dynamic modeling approaches
Authors: Clarke J. Esmerian, Nickolay Y. Gnedin
Abstract: We model the interstellar dust content of the reionization era with a suite of cosmological, fluid-dynamical simulations of galaxies with stellar masses ranging from $\sim 10^5 - 10^9 M_{\odot}$ in the first $1.2$ billion years of the universe. We use a post-processing method that accounts for dust creation and destruction processes, allowing us to systematically vary the parameters of these processes to test whether dust-dependent observable quantities of galaxies at these epochs could be useful for placing constraints on dust physics. We then forward model observable properties of these galaxies to compare to existing data. We find that we are unable to simultaneously match existing observational constraints with any one set of model parameters. Specifically, the models which predict the largest dust masses $D/Z \gtrsim 0.1$ at $z = 5$ -- because of high assumed production yields and/or efficient growth via accretion in the interstellar medium -- are preferred by constraints on total dust mass and infrared luminosities, but these models produce far too much extinction in the ultraviolet, preventing them from matching observations of $\beta_{\rm UV}$. To investigate this discrepancy, we analyze the relative spatial distribution of stars and dust as probed by infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) emission, which appear to exhibit overly symmetric morphologies compared to existing data, likely due to the limitations of the stellar feedback model used in the simulations. Our results indicate that the observable properties of the dust distribution in high redshift galaxies are a particularly strong test of stellar feedback.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.