Leveraging Large Language Models for Exploiting ASR Uncertainty

AI-generated keywords: N-best lists

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large language models (LLMs) have shown great performance in natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
  • LLMs face challenges in spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks due to accuracy limitations of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems.
  • This work aims to improve the accuracy of LLMs on SLU tasks by addressing high word-error-rate in ASR systems.
  • The authors propose a novel approach of prompting the LLM with an n-best list of ASR hypotheses instead of relying solely on the 1-best hypothesis.
  • Prompt-engineering techniques are used to explain the concept of n-best lists to the LLM.
  • Low-Rank Adapters are introduced for fine-tuning on downstream tasks.
  • By leveraging n-best lists and using Low-Rank Adapters, their approach enhances performance on device-directed speech detection and keyword spotting tasks.
  • Systems that use n-best list prompts outperform those using only 1-best ASR hypotheses.
  • This research demonstrates an efficient method to exploit ASR uncertainty via LLMs in speech-based applications.
  • Significant improvements can be achieved without major modifications to existing ASR and LLM models.
  • This approach has potential implications for multiple unrelated tasks that can benefit from shared ASR and LLM resources.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Pranay Dighe, Yi Su, Shangshang Zheng, Yunshu Liu, Vineet Garg, Xiaochuan Niu, Ahmed Tewfik

Abstract: While large language models excel in a variety of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, to perform well on spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks, they must either rely on off-the-shelf automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems for transcription, or be equipped with an in-built speech modality. This work focuses on the former scenario, where LLM's accuracy on SLU tasks is constrained by the accuracy of a fixed ASR system on the spoken input. Specifically, we tackle speech-intent classification task, where a high word-error-rate can limit the LLM's ability to understand the spoken intent. Instead of chasing a high accuracy by designing complex or specialized architectures regardless of deployment costs, we seek to answer how far we can go without substantially changing the underlying ASR and LLM, which can potentially be shared by multiple unrelated tasks. To this end, we propose prompting the LLM with an n-best list of ASR hypotheses instead of only the error-prone 1-best hypothesis. We explore prompt-engineering to explain the concept of n-best lists to the LLM; followed by the finetuning of Low-Rank Adapters on the downstream tasks. Our approach using n-best lists proves to be effective on a device-directed speech detection task as well as on a keyword spotting task, where systems using n-best list prompts outperform those using 1-best ASR hypothesis; thus paving the way for an efficient method to exploit ASR uncertainty via LLMs for speech-based applications.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.04842v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of natural language processing (NLP), large language models (LLMs) have shown great performance in various tasks. However, when it comes to spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks, LLMs face challenges due to the accuracy limitations of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems used for transcription. This work focuses on improving the accuracy of LLMs on SLU tasks by addressing the issue of high word-error-rate in ASR systems, which can hinder the LLM's ability to understand spoken intent. Instead of designing complex architectures or specialized models that may incur high deployment costs, the authors aim to explore how far they can improve SLU performance without substantially changing the underlying ASR and LLM models. To achieve this, they propose a novel approach of prompting the LLM with an n-best list of ASR hypotheses instead of relying solely on the error-prone 1-best hypothesis. The concept of n-best lists is explained to the LLM through prompt-engineering techniques. The authors also introduce Low-Rank Adapters for fine-tuning on downstream tasks. By leveraging n-best lists and using Low-Rank Adapters, their approach proves effective in enhancing performance on device-directed speech detection and keyword spotting tasks. Systems that utilize n-best list prompts outperform those using only 1-best ASR hypotheses. This research paves the way for an efficient method to exploit ASR uncertainty via LLMs in speech-based applications. It demonstrates that by incorporating n-best lists into prompt engineering and utilizing Low-Rank Adapters, significant improvements can be achieved without major modifications to existing ASR and LLM models. This approach has potential implications for multiple unrelated tasks that can benefit from shared ASR and LLM resources. Overall, this study highlights a promising direction for leveraging large language models to overcome ASR uncertainties and enhance spoken language understanding capabilities in various applications.
Created on 24 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.