The Cambridge Law Corpus (CLC) is a valuable resource for legal AI research, consisting of over 250,000 court cases from the UK. The corpus includes cases from as far back as the 16th century, providing a comprehensive historical perspective. In this paper, the authors present the first release of the corpus, which includes raw text and meta-data. Additionally, they provide annotations on case outcomes for 638 cases conducted by legal experts. To establish benchmarks for case outcome extraction, the authors trained and evaluated GPT-3, GPT-4 and RoBERTa models using their annotated data. This allows researchers to compare their own models against these established benchmarks. Considering the sensitive nature of legal materials, an extensive legal and ethical discussion is included in this paper. As a result, the corpus will only be released for research purposes under certain restrictions to ensure responsible use. The creation and curation process of the CLC involved cleaning and transforming Microsoft Word and PDF files into an XML format. Optical character recognition (OCR) was used to convert PDF files into textual form using the Tesseract engine. The resulting text files were then converted to XML format with original documents stored separately for quality control purposes. Due to the size of the corpus manual annotation or curation of entire dataset was not feasible so a query-driven approach inspired by Voormann and Gut (2008) was employed instead. This iterative process focused on improving various aspects of corpus through small incremental steps such as adding new annotations metadata cases correcting errors etcetera. The CLC project page provides example data terms of use interested researchers at HTTPS://WWW.CST.CAMACUK/RESEARCH/SRG/PROJECTS/LAW . Legal language poses unique challenges due to its specialized terminology strong semantics Specialized large language models like BERT have been developed specifically for legal applications (Chalkidis et al., 2020; Masala et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021).
- - The Cambridge Law Corpus (CLC) is a valuable resource for legal AI research
- - Consists of over 250,000 court cases from the UK
- - Includes cases from as far back as the 16th century, providing a comprehensive historical perspective
- - First release of the corpus includes raw text and meta-data
- - Annotations on case outcomes provided for 638 cases conducted by legal experts
- - GPT-3, GPT-4, and RoBERTa models were trained and evaluated using annotated data to establish benchmarks for case outcome extraction
- - Extensive legal and ethical discussion included in the paper due to sensitive nature of legal materials
- - Corpus will only be released for research purposes under certain restrictions to ensure responsible use
- - Creation and curation process involved cleaning and transforming Microsoft Word and PDF files into XML format
- - OCR used to convert PDF files into textual form using Tesseract engine
- - Query-driven approach employed for annotation and curation due to size of corpus
- - CLC project page provides example data and terms of use for interested researchers
- - Specialized large language models like BERT have been developed specifically for legal applications
The Cambridge Law Corpus (CLC) is a big collection of court cases from the UK that researchers use to study AI in law. It has over 250,000 cases, some of which are really old and give us a historical perspective. The first version of the corpus has the original text and information about each case. Experts have also added notes on what happened in 638 cases. They used this data to train and test different models for predicting case outcomes. Because legal stuff is sensitive, there's a lot of discussion about ethics in the research paper. The corpus will only be shared with certain restrictions to make sure it's used responsibly. To create the CLC, they had to clean up and change Word and PDF files into a special format called XML. They also used OCR technology to turn PDFs into readable text using something called Tesseract engine. Since there are so many cases, they used a special method to organize everything based on questions people might ask about them. If you're interested in learning more or using the corpus for your own research, you can find example data and rules on the CLC project page. There are also special language models like BERT that were made just for legal things."
Introducing the Cambridge Law Corpus (CLC): A Comprehensive Resource for Legal AI Research
The legal field is a complex and ever-evolving landscape, making it difficult to keep up with the latest developments. To help researchers stay ahead of the curve, a team of experts from the University of Cambridge has created an invaluable resource: The Cambridge Law Corpus (CLC). This corpus consists of over 250,000 court cases from as far back as the 16th century, providing a comprehensive historical perspective. In this article, we’ll discuss what makes CLC such an important resource for legal AI research and how it was created.
What Is CLC?
The CLC is a valuable resource for legal AI research that includes raw text and meta-data from over 250,000 court cases spanning centuries. Additionally, annotations on case outcomes have been provided by legal experts for 638 cases. These annotations can be used to establish benchmarks for case outcome extraction when training and evaluating models like GPT-3, GPT-4 and RoBERTa.
Legal & Ethical Considerations
Considering the sensitive nature of legal materials, an extensive discussion on legal and ethical considerations was included in this paper before releasing the corpus to ensure responsible use. As a result, CLC will only be released for research purposes under certain restrictions outlined in their terms of use available at https://www.cst.camacuk/research/srg/projects/law .
Creating & Curating CLC
To create CLC, Microsoft Word and PDF files were cleaned and transformed into an XML format using optical character recognition (OCR) with Tesseract engine to convert PDFs into textual form. The resulting text files were then converted to XML format with original documents stored separately for quality control purposes. Due to the size of the corpus manual annotation or curation of entire dataset was not feasible so a query-driven approach inspired by Voormann and Gut (2008) was employed instead which focused on improving various aspects through small incremental steps such as adding new annotations metadata cases correcting errors etcetera..
Conclusion
The creation of The Cambridge Law Corpus provides researchers with access to a vast amount of data that can be used in developing more accurate models for predicting case outcomes in legal applications using large language models like BERT (Chalkidis et al., 2020; Masala et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). With its comprehensive historical perspective stretching back centuries combined with detailed annotations made by expert lawyers it is sure to become one of most valuable resources available today!