Enhancing Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models through Logic

AI-generated keywords: LogiCoT reasoning language models symbolic logic zero-shot

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Recent advancements in large language models have demonstrated impressive ability to generalize across domains
  • Large language models struggle with multi-step reasoning tasks, indicating a need for improvement in their reasoning abilities
  • Large language models often fail to effectively utilize extensive knowledge to establish coherent thinking patterns, particularly in reasoning
  • Generative language models sometimes exhibit hallucinations due to unconstrained reasoning procedures lacking adherence to logical principles
  • The authors propose a neurosymbolic framework called LogiCoT to enhance the zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning ability of large language models
  • LogiCoT leverages principles from symbolic logic to verify and revise reasoning processes accordingly
  • Incorporating logical principles improves coherence and accuracy of output in various language tasks such as arithmetic, commonsense understanding, symbolic reasoning, causal inference, and social problems
  • Experimental assessments validate the effectiveness of LogiCoT's enhanced reasoning paradigm in improving overall reasoning capabilities of large language models.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xufeng Zhao, Mengdi Li, Wenhao Lu, Cornelius Weber, Jae Hee Lee, Kun Chu, Stefan Wermter

Abstract: Recent advancements in large language models have showcased their remarkable generalizability across various domains. However, their reasoning abilities still have significant room for improvement, especially when confronted with scenarios requiring multi-step reasoning. Although large language models possess extensive knowledge, their behavior, particularly in terms of reasoning, often fails to effectively utilize this knowledge to establish a coherent thinking paradigm. Generative language models sometimes show hallucinations as their reasoning procedures are unconstrained by logical principles. Aiming to improve the zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning ability of large language models, we propose Logical Chain-of-Thought (LogiCoT), a neurosymbolic framework that leverages principles from symbolic logic to verify and revise the reasoning processes accordingly. Experimental evaluations conducted on language tasks in diverse domains, including arithmetic, commonsense, symbolic, causal inference, and social problems, demonstrate the efficacy of the enhanced reasoning paradigm by logic.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Sep. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2309.13339v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recent advancements in large language models have demonstrated their impressive ability to generalize across various domains. However, these models still struggle with multi-step reasoning tasks, indicating a need for improvement in their reasoning abilities. Despite possessing extensive knowledge, large language models often fail to effectively utilize this knowledge to establish coherent thinking patterns, particularly when it comes to reasoning. In fact, generative language models sometimes exhibit hallucinations due to their unconstrained reasoning procedures that lack adherence to logical principles. To address this limitation and enhance the zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning ability of large language models, the authors propose a neurosymbolic framework called Logical Chain-of-Thought (LogiCoT). This framework leverages principles from symbolic logic to verify and revise the reasoning processes accordingly. By incorporating logical principles into the model's reasoning procedures, LogiCoT aims to improve the coherence and accuracy of its output. The efficacy of LogiCoT's enhanced reasoning paradigm is evaluated through experimental assessments on various language tasks spanning different domains such as arithmetic, commonsense understanding, symbolic reasoning, causal inference and social problems. The results demonstrate that incorporating logic into the model's reasoning process significantly improves its performance in these tasks. In conclusion, this study introduces LogiCoT as a neurosymbolic framework that enhances the zero-shot chain-of-thought reasoning ability of large language models by leveraging principles from symbolic logic. The experimental evaluations conducted on diverse language tasks validate the effectiveness of this approach in improving the model's overall reasoning capabilities.
Created on 03 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.