Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning Acting and Planning in Language Models
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper introduces a framework called LATS (Language Agent Tree Search) to enhance decision-making capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
- LLMs have impressive performance in decision-making tasks but lack autonomy
- LATS leverages the strengths of LLMs in planning, acting, and reasoning
- Inspired by Monte Carlo tree search in model-based reinforcement learning
- LATS utilizes LLMs as agents, value functions, and optimizers for enhanced decision-making processes
- Incorporates an environment for external feedback to enable deliberate and adaptive problem-solving mechanism
- Experimental assessments conducted across diverse domains such as programming, HotPotQA, and WebShop
- Results demonstrate applicability of LATS for both reasoning and acting tasks
- Impressive scores achieved with GPT-4 for programming on HumanEval (94.4%) and with GPT-3.5 for web browsing on WebShop (75.9%)
- Highlights how LATS can unify reasoning, acting, and planning within language models to overcome limitations as autonomous agents
- Findings showcase effectiveness and generality of this approach across different domains
Authors: Andy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang, Yu-Xiong Wang
Abstract: While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance on a range of decision-making tasks, they rely on simple acting processes and fall short of broad deployment as autonomous agents. We introduce LATS (Language Agent Tree Search), a general framework that synergizes the capabilities of LLMs in planning, acting, and reasoning. Drawing inspiration from Monte Carlo tree search in model-based reinforcement learning, LATS employs LLMs as agents, value functions, and optimizers, repurposing their latent strengths for enhanced decision-making. What is crucial in this method is the use of an environment for external feedback, which offers a more deliberate and adaptive problem-solving mechanism that moves beyond the limitations of existing techniques. Our experimental evaluation across diverse domains, such as programming, HotPotQA, and WebShop, illustrates the applicability of LATS for both reasoning and acting. In particular, LATS achieves 94.4\% for programming on HumanEval with GPT-4 and an average score of 75.9 for web browsing on WebShop with GPT-3.5, demonstrating the effectiveness and generality of our method.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.