In this study, the authors investigate the phenomenon of grokking, which refers to the delayed generalization that occurs after memorization in deep learning models. They propose that this phenomenon can be attributed to compression and aim to understand it from a computation/information complexity perspective. To measure network complexity, the authors introduce a metric called linear mapping number (LMN), which is an extension of the linear region number for ReLU networks. LMN provides a way to characterize neural network compression before generalization. The authors argue in favor of using LMN over the popular choice of $L_2$ norm for characterizing model complexity for several reasons. Firstly, LMN can be naturally interpreted as information/computation, whereas $L_2$ norm cannot. Secondly, during the compression phase, LMN exhibits linear relationships with test losses, while $L_2$ norm shows complicated nonlinear correlations with test losses. Lastly, LMN reveals an intriguing phenomenon where XOR networks switch between two generalization solutions, which is not observed with $L_2$ norm. The authors also discuss related works and discussions on grokking and complexity measures in deep learning. Previous attempts have been made to understand grokking through toy models and measures that characterize its dynamics. Complexity measures such as linear region number have been proposed from an information perspective. However, this work extends these measures by introducing LMN that can accommodate general networks with any activation function. Furthermore, the authors highlight the connection between compression and deep learning. The theory of information bottleneck suggests a compression phase followed by a fitting phase in deep learning models. Recent studies have also attributed the success of language models to compression. The authors agree that considering information and compression perspectives are crucial for unlocking generalization puzzles in deep learning and propose that LMN could serve as a useful metric in this regard. In summary, this study explores grokking from a computation/information complexity perspective by introducing the concept of LMN as a measure of network complexity.
- - The study investigates the phenomenon of grokking in deep learning models
- - Grokking refers to delayed generalization after memorization
- - The authors propose that grokking is attributed to compression
- - They introduce a metric called linear mapping number (LMN) to measure network complexity
- - LMN is preferred over $L_2$ norm for characterizing model complexity due to its interpretability and linear relationships with test losses during compression phase
- - LMN reveals an intriguing phenomenon where XOR networks switch between two generalization solutions, which is not observed with $L_2$ norm
- - Previous attempts have been made to understand grokking through toy models and measures like linear region number
- - This work extends these measures by introducing LMN that can accommodate any activation function
- - The authors highlight the connection between compression and deep learning, citing information bottleneck theory and success of language models
- - Considering information and compression perspectives are crucial for understanding generalization puzzles in deep learning
Summary- The study is about understanding a concept called grokking in deep learning models.
- Grokking means that sometimes we remember things but don't understand them right away.
- The researchers think that grokking happens because of compression, which is when things get smaller and simpler.
- They made a new way to measure how complex a network is called linear mapping number (LMN).
- LMN helps us understand how well the model works during compression.
Definitions- Grokking: When we remember something but don't understand it right away.
- Compression: When things get smaller and simpler.
- Linear mapping number (LMN): A way to measure how complex a network is.
Exploring Grokking from a Computation/Information Complexity Perspective
Deep learning models have the remarkable ability to generalize from data, but the phenomenon of grokking—the delayed generalization that occurs after memorization—remains largely unexplained. In this research paper, the authors investigate grokking from a computation/information complexity perspective and propose a metric called linear mapping number (LMN) as an extension of the linear region number for ReLU networks. This article will discuss why LMN is preferable over $L_2$ norm for characterizing model complexity, explore how LMN reveals an intriguing phenomenon where XOR networks switch between two generalization solutions, and examine related works and discussions on grokking and complexity measures in deep learning.
Why LMN is Preferable Over $L_2$ Norm
The authors argue in favor of using LMN over the popular choice of $L_2$ norm for characterizing model complexity for several reasons. Firstly, LMN can be naturally interpreted as information/computation, whereas $L_2$ norm cannot. Secondly, during the compression phase, LMN exhibits linear relationships with test losses while $L_2$ norm shows complicated nonlinear correlations with test losses. Lastly, LMN reveals an intriguing phenomenon where XOR networks switch between two generalization solutions which is not observed with $L_2$ norm.
Intriguing Phenomenon Revealed by LMN
LMN reveals an intriguing phenomenon where XOR networks switch between two generalization solutions depending on their initial weights: one solution corresponds to low-dimensional representations while another corresponds to high-dimensional representations. The authors suggest that this could be due to different levels of compression or information loss associated with each solution; however further research is needed to understand this behavior more deeply.
Related Works & Discussions
Previous attempts have been made to understand grokking through toy models and measures that characterize its dynamics such as linear region number from an information perspective. However, this work extends these measures by introducing LMN that can accommodate general networks with any activation function. Furthermore, recent studies have attributed the success of language models to compression and highlighted its connection with deep learning theory such as information bottleneck suggesting a compression phase followed by fitting phase in deep learning models . The authors agree that considering information and compression perspectives are crucial for unlocking generalization puzzles in deep learning and propose that LMN could serve as a useful metric in this regard..
Conclusion
In summary, this study explores grokking from a computation/information complexity perspective by introducing the concept of Linear Mapping Number (LMN) as a measure of network complexity which provides insight into neural network compression before generalization compared to other metrics like L2 Norms . It also highlights how understanding compression might help unlock some mysteries about deep learning’s ability to learn complex tasks quickly without overfitting or underfitting data sets .