Take a Step Back: Evoking Reasoning via Abstraction in Large Language Models
AI-generated Key Points
- Technique called Step-Back Prompting aims to improve complex multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs)
- Grounds reasoning on abstractions to reduce errors in intermediate reasoning steps
- Derives high-level concepts and first principles from instances containing specific details to guide the reasoning process
- Significant performance gains observed on STEM, Knowledge QA, and Multi-Hop Reasoning tasks using PaLM-2L models
- Improvements seen in MMLU Physics and Chemistry (7% and 11%), TimeQA (27%), and MuSiQue (7%)
- Builds upon previous research on process supervision with step-by-step verification and Chain-of-Thought prompting
- Inspired by human problem-solving strategies of stepping back and abstracting high-level concepts and principles
- Simple yet effective technique for improving complex multi-step reasoning in LLMs
- Experimental results demonstrate substantial performance gains across various challenging tasks
Authors: Huaixiu Steven Zheng, Swaroop Mishra, Xinyun Chen, Heng-Tze Cheng, Ed H. Chi, Quoc V Le, Denny Zhou
Abstract: We present Step-Back Prompting, a simple prompting technique that enables LLMs to do abstractions to derive high-level concepts and first principles from instances containing specific details. Using the concepts and principles to guide the reasoning steps, LLMs significantly improve their abilities in following a correct reasoning path towards the solution. We conduct experiments of Step-Back Prompting with PaLM-2L models and observe substantial performance gains on a wide range of challenging reasoning-intensive tasks including STEM, Knowledge QA, and Multi-Hop Reasoning. For instance, Step-Back Prompting improves PaLM-2L performance on MMLU Physics and Chemistry by 7% and 11%, TimeQA by 27%, and MuSiQue by 7%.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.