Language models have advanced at a rapid pace, surpassing our ability to effectively evaluate them. To further develop these models, it is crucial to explore the frontier of their capabilities. Real-world software engineering provides a rich and challenging testbed for assessing the next generation of language models. Introducing SWE-bench, an evaluation framework comprising 2,294 software engineering problems sourced from real GitHub issues and pull requests across 12 popular Python repositories. In this framework, a language model is tasked with editing codebases to address specific issues, often requiring understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously. This demands interaction with execution environments, processing of extensive contexts, and complex reasoning beyond traditional code generation. Evaluation results reveal that even state-of-the-art proprietary models and the fine-tuned SWE-Llama can only resolve simple issues. Claude 2 and GPT-4 achieve success rates of only 4.8% and 1.7%, respectively, even when provided with an oracle retriever. Progress on SWE-bench signifies advancements towards more practical, intelligent, and autonomous language models in software engineering tasks. In addition to the main findings discussed above,<nl>the reproducibility statement emphasizes the thorough documentation provided alongside the source code submission for transparency and future reference.</nl> The plan to release SWE-bench as an open-source repository aligns with ethical considerations for increased accessibility and reproducibility in research endeavors. Furthermore,<nl>related work in evaluating language models highlights various approaches taken by recent studies but points out limitations in focusing narrowly on individual tasks or domains.</nl> A qualitative analysis of generations from SWE-Llama sheds light on the quality of task resolutions under an "oracle" retrieval setting through detailed examples and analyses presented in accompanying sections.
- - Language models have advanced rapidly, making it challenging to evaluate them effectively.
- - Exploring the capabilities of language models is crucial for further development.
- - Real-world software engineering provides a rich testbed for assessing next-generation language models.
- - SWE-bench is an evaluation framework with 2,294 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues and pull requests in Python repositories.
- - Language models in SWE-bench edit codebases to address specific issues, requiring complex reasoning and interaction with execution environments.
- - Even state-of-the-art models like Claude 2 and GPT-4 achieve low success rates on SWE-bench tasks.
- - Progress on SWE-bench indicates advancements towards more practical and intelligent language models for software engineering tasks.
- - The reproducibility statement emphasizes thorough documentation for transparency and future reference.
- - The plan to release SWE-bench as an open-source repository aligns with ethical considerations for accessibility and reproducibility in research.
- - Related work highlights various approaches in evaluating language models but points out limitations in focusing narrowly on individual tasks or domains.
Summary1. Language models have improved a lot, which makes it hard to check how good they are.
2. We need to test what language models can do to make them even better.
3. Real-world computer programs help us see how well new language models work.
4. SWE-bench is a tool with many real software problems for testing language models in Python code.
5. Language models in SWE-bench fix code problems by thinking and working with the program.
Definitions- Language models: Programs that understand and generate human language.
- Evaluate: To judge or measure how good something is.
- Capabilities: What something can do or its skills.
- Software engineering: Creating and maintaining computer programs.
- Framework: A structure or system for organizing and evaluating things.
- Codebases: Collections of code that make up a program's source files.
- Reproducibility: Making sure others can repeat an experiment or test to get the same results.
- Open-source repository: A place where software code is stored and shared freely with others.
Language models have become increasingly advanced in recent years, surpassing our ability to effectively evaluate them. In order to further develop these models and push the boundaries of their capabilities, it is crucial to explore new and challenging testbeds. One such area that has recently gained attention is real-world software engineering.
In a research paper titled "SWE-bench: A Testbed for Evaluating Language Models on Real-World Software Engineering Tasks," authors Ashkan Kazemi and Hamed Nilforoshan introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework designed specifically for assessing the next generation of language models in software engineering tasks.
The framework consists of 2,294 software engineering problems sourced from real GitHub issues and pull requests across 12 popular Python repositories. These problems cover a wide range of issues commonly encountered by developers, including bug fixes, feature additions, and code refactoring.
One key aspect of SWE-bench is its focus on evaluating language models' ability to edit codebases to address specific issues. This task often requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and files simultaneously – something that traditional code generation methods struggle with. As such, this type of evaluation demands interaction with execution environments, processing extensive contexts, and complex reasoning beyond what current language models are capable of.
The results from SWE-bench's evaluations reveal that even state-of-the-art proprietary models and the fine-tuned SWE-Llama can only resolve simple issues. Claude 2 and GPT-4 achieve success rates of only 4.8% and 1.7%, respectively – even when provided with an oracle retriever (a tool used to retrieve relevant information). However,the reproducibility statement emphasizes the thorough documentation provided alongside the source code submission for transparency and future reference.
This highlights the need for continued advancements towards more practical, intelligent, and autonomous language models in software engineering tasks. The progress made on SWE-bench signifies a step towards achieving this goal.
In addition to the main findings discussed above, the researchers also address ethical considerations in their work. They plan to release SWE-bench as an open-source repository, aligning with the growing trend of increased accessibility and reproducibility in research endeavors.
Furthermore,related work in evaluating language models highlights various approaches taken by recent studies but points out limitations in focusing narrowly on individual tasks or domains. This further emphasizes the significance of SWE-bench as a comprehensive evaluation framework that covers a wide range of real-world software engineering problems.
To provide a deeper understanding of the quality of task resolutions under an "oracle" retrieval setting, the authors also include a qualitative analysis of generations from SWE-Llama. This analysis sheds light on how well language models are able to resolve issues when provided with all relevant information through an oracle retriever. Detailed examples and analyses are presented in accompanying sections for further insight into these results.
In conclusion, Kazemi and Nilforoshan's research paper introduces SWE-bench – an evaluation framework designed specifically for assessing language models' capabilities in real-world software engineering tasks. The extensive evaluations conducted using this framework reveal current limitations and highlight areas for future advancements towards more practical and autonomous language models. With its planned release as an open-source repository, SWE-bench will not only contribute to advancing language model research but also promote transparency and reproducibility within the field.