Learning To Teach Large Language Models Logical Reasoning

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Logical Reasoning Challenges Enhancing Skills Incorporating Logic

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Authors Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, and Dongsheng Li address challenges faced by large language models (LLMs) in logical reasoning tasks.
LLMs often produce unreliable content in practical reasoning scenarios due to issues like hallucination.
The authors conduct a study focusing on tasks such as event relation extraction and deductive reasoning to highlight LLMs' shortcomings in rigorous reasoning.
LLMs struggle with tasks requiring precise logic and tend to generate counterfactual answers, necessitating iterative refinement.
The authors explore strategies to enhance LLMs' logical reasoning skills for improved consistency across diverse contexts.
They introduce a synthesized dataset called LLM-LR that incorporates multi-hop reasoning for evaluation and pre-training purposes.
Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate the importance of incorporating logic into LLM training for better performance in various tasks.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, Dongsheng Li

arXiv: 2310.09158v1 - DOI (cs.AI)

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have gained enormous attention from both academia and industry, due to their exceptional ability in language generation and extremely powerful generalization. However, current LLMs still output unreliable content in practical reasoning tasks due to their inherent issues (e.g., hallucination). To better disentangle this problem, in this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in logical reasoning. More in detail, we first investigate the deficiency of LLMs in logical reasoning on different tasks, including event relation extraction and deductive reasoning. Our study demonstrates that LLMs are not good reasoners in solving tasks with rigorous reasoning and will produce counterfactual answers, which require us to iteratively refine. Therefore, we comprehensively explore different strategies to endow LLMs with logical reasoning ability, and thus enable them to generate more logically consistent answers across different scenarios. Based on our approach, we also contribute a synthesized dataset (LLM-LR) involving multi-hop reasoning for evaluation and pre-training. Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses on different tasks also validate the effectiveness and necessity of teaching LLMs with logic and provide insights for solving practical tasks with LLMs in future work.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.09158v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In their paper "Learning To Teach Large Language Models Logical Reasoning," authors Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, and Dongsheng Li delve into the challenges faced by large language models (LLMs) in logical reasoning tasks. Despite the remarkable language generation capabilities and generalization power of LLMs, they often produce unreliable content in practical reasoning scenarios due to issues like hallucination. To address this issue, the authors conduct a thorough investigation to assess the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs. Their study focuses on various tasks such as event relation extraction and deductive reasoning to highlight the shortcomings of LLMs in rigorous reasoning. The research reveals that LLMs struggle with tasks requiring precise logic and tend to generate counterfactual answers, necessitating iterative refinement. In response to these findings, the authors explore different strategies to enhance LLMs' logical reasoning skills, aiming to improve the consistency of their answers across diverse contexts. Furthermore, the authors introduce a synthesized dataset called LLM-LR that incorporates multi-hop reasoning for evaluation and pre-training purposes. Through extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses across different tasks, they demonstrate the effectiveness and importance of incorporating logic into LLM training. This work not only sheds light on teaching LLMs logical reasoning but also provides valuable insights for leveraging these models in practical applications moving forward.

- Authors Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, and Dongsheng Li address challenges faced by large language models (LLMs) in logical reasoning tasks.
- LLMs often produce unreliable content in practical reasoning scenarios due to issues like hallucination.
- The authors conduct a study focusing on tasks such as event relation extraction and deductive reasoning to highlight LLMs' shortcomings in rigorous reasoning.
- LLMs struggle with tasks requiring precise logic and tend to generate counterfactual answers, necessitating iterative refinement.
- The authors explore strategies to enhance LLMs' logical reasoning skills for improved consistency across diverse contexts.
- They introduce a synthesized dataset called LLM-LR that incorporates multi-hop reasoning for evaluation and pre-training purposes.
- Extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses demonstrate the importance of incorporating logic into LLM training for better performance in various tasks.

SummaryAuthors Meiqi Chen, Yubo Ma, Kaitao Song, Yixin Cao, Yan Zhang, and Dongsheng Li talk about problems faced by big language models (LLMs) when solving logical puzzles. LLMs sometimes give wrong answers because they make things up instead of using real facts. The authors did a study to show how LLMs struggle with tasks that need clear thinking and often give wrong answers that are not true. They found that LLMs need help to improve their logical skills so they can be more accurate in different situations. The authors also created a special test called LLM-LR to check how well these models can reason through complex problems. Definitions- Authors: People who write books or articles. - Large language models (LLMs): Complex computer programs that understand and generate human language. - Logical reasoning: Thinking carefully and following rules to come up with correct answers. - Hallucination: Seeing or hearing things that are not really there. - Deductive reasoning: Using known facts to draw specific conclusions. - Counterfactual answers: Answers that are not true or based on real information. - Iterative refinement: Making small changes over time to improve something. - Dataset: A collection of data used for analysis or testing purposes. - Multi-hop reasoning: Following multiple steps or connections to reach a conclusion. - Quantitative analysis: Studying data using numbers and statistics. - Qualitative analysis: Studying data based on qualities like descriptions

Introduction

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have made significant strides in natural language processing tasks such as text generation and question-answering. These models, trained on massive amounts of data, have shown impressive capabilities in understanding and generating human-like language. However, when it comes to logical reasoning tasks, LLMs often struggle to produce reliable and consistent results. This issue has raised concerns about the practical applicability of these models in real-world scenarios. To address this problem, Meiqi Chen and his team from Tsinghua University conducted a comprehensive study titled "Learning To Teach Large Language Models Logical Reasoning." In this paper, they investigate the challenges faced by LLMs in logical reasoning tasks and propose strategies to enhance their abilities.

The Challenges Faced by LLMs

The authors begin by highlighting the limitations of existing LLMs in rigorous reasoning tasks. They point out that despite their remarkable generalization power, these models often generate unreliable content due to issues like hallucination – producing information that is not supported by evidence or logic. To demonstrate this issue further, the authors conduct experiments on various tasks such as event relation extraction and deductive reasoning. They find that LLMs struggle with precise logic-based questions and tend to generate counterfactual answers instead of factual ones. This limitation hinders their ability to provide accurate responses consistently across diverse contexts.

Introducing a Synthesized Dataset for Evaluation

To evaluate the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs more comprehensively, the authors introduce a synthesized dataset called LLM-LR (Large Language Model Logical Reasoning). This dataset incorporates multi-hop reasoning – requiring multiple steps of inference – making it more challenging than traditional datasets used for evaluating language models. Using this dataset, the authors compare different state-of-the-art LLMs' performance on various logical reasoning tasks. They find that while these models perform well on simpler tasks, they struggle with more complex ones, highlighting the need for further improvement.

Enhancing LLMs' Logical Reasoning Skills

To address the limitations of LLMs in logical reasoning, the authors propose several strategies to enhance their abilities. These include incorporating logic into model training and fine-tuning processes and using iterative refinement techniques. The authors also suggest leveraging external knowledge sources such as knowledge graphs to improve LLMs' understanding of factual information and reduce hallucination. They demonstrate the effectiveness of these strategies through experiments on different tasks, showing significant improvements in performance.

The Importance of Incorporating Logic into LLM Training

Through their extensive quantitative and qualitative analyses, the authors emphasize the importance of incorporating logic into LLM training. They argue that by teaching these models how to reason logically, we can improve their consistency and reliability in generating accurate responses across diverse contexts. Furthermore, this work provides valuable insights for leveraging LLMs in practical applications moving forward. By addressing their limitations in logical reasoning, we can unlock their full potential for real-world use cases such as virtual assistants or automated customer service chatbots.

Conclusion

In conclusion, "Learning To Teach Large Language Models Logical Reasoning" is a comprehensive study that sheds light on the challenges faced by LLMs in logical reasoning tasks. The authors highlight the limitations of existing models and propose strategies to enhance their abilities through incorporating logic into training processes and leveraging external knowledge sources. This research not only contributes towards improving LLMs' logical reasoning skills but also provides valuable insights for utilizing these models effectively in practical applications. With further advancements in this area, we can expect even more impressive capabilities from large language models in the future.

Created on 25 Feb. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.