QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet

AI-generated keywords: QUIC performance implications high-speed networks data rate reduction efficiency

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study reveals up to 45.2% data rate reduction with UDP+QUIC+HTTP/3 vs. TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 on fast Internet
  • Performance issue worsens with higher bandwidth, impacting lightweight clients and popular browsers
  • Affects file transfers, video streaming (potential bitrate reduction of 9.8%), and general web browsing
  • Root cause identified as high receiver-side processing overhead in QUIC due to excessive data packets and acknowledgments
  • Recommendations provided for improving QUIC efficiency over fast Internet connections
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xumiao Zhang, Shuowei Jin, Yi He, Ahmad Hassan, Z. Morley Mao, Feng Qian, Zhi-Li Zhang

10 pages, 16 figures

Abstract: QUIC is expected to be a game-changer in improving web application performance. In this paper, we conduct a systematic examination of QUIC's performance over high-speed networks. We find that over fast Internet, the UDP+QUIC+HTTP/3 stack suffers a data rate reduction of up to 45.2% compared to the TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 counterpart. Moreover, the performance gap between QUIC and HTTP/2 grows as the underlying bandwidth increases. We observe this issue on lightweight data transfer clients and major web browsers (Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera), on different hosts (desktop, mobile), and over diverse networks (wired broadband, cellular). It affects not only file transfers, but also various applications such as video streaming (up to 9.8% video bitrate reduction) and web browsing. Through rigorous packet trace analysis and kernel- and user-space profiling, we identify the root cause to be high receiver-side processing overhead, in particular, excessive data packets and QUIC's user-space ACKs. We make concrete recommendations for mitigating the observed performance issues.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.09423v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "QUIC is not Quick Enough over Fast Internet," authors Xumiao Zhang, Shuowei Jin, Yi He, Ahmad Hassan, Z. Morley Mao, Feng Qian, and Zhi-Li Zhang delve into the performance implications of QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections) over high-speed networks. The study uncovers a significant data rate reduction of up to 45.2% when utilizing the UDP+QUIC+HTTP/3 stack compared to the TCP+TLS+HTTP/2 counterpart on fast Internet connections. This issue becomes more pronounced as bandwidth increases and affects lightweight data transfer clients and popular web browsers such as Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Opera on various devices like desktops and mobile phones. It impacts not only file transfers but also extends to applications like video streaming with a potential bitrate reduction of up to 9.8% and general web browsing experiences. Through meticulous packet trace analysis and profiling in both kernel- and user-space environments, the authors identify the root cause of these performance challenges as high receiver-side processing overhead stemming from excessive data packets and user-space acknowledgments within QUIC. They offer concrete recommendations for alleviating these observed issues to enhance the efficiency of QUIC over fast Internet connections. This comprehensive study sheds light on the complexities surrounding QUIC's performance over high-speed networks and provides valuable insights for optimizing its functionality in real-world scenarios.
Created on 19 Oct. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.