GROOViST: A Metric for Grounding Objects in Visual Storytelling

AI-generated keywords: Visual storytelling GROOViST Grounding Evaluation EMNLP 2023

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors: Aditya K Surikuchi, Sandro Pezzelle, and Raquel Fernández
  • Topic: Evaluation of stories generated for a sequence of images (visual storytelling)
  • Aspects to consider: Coherence, grammatical correctness, visual grounding
  • Emphasis on evaluating degree of grounding in stories
  • Thorough analysis of existing metrics and tools
  • Introduction of GROOViST:
  • Addresses cross-modal dependencies, temporal misalignments, human intuitions
  • Modular design for assessing components individually
  • Enhances granularity and accuracy of evaluations in visual storytelling tasks
  • Presentation at EMNLP 2023 main conference proceedings
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Aditya K Surikuchi, Sandro Pezzelle, Raquel Fernández

In EMNLP 2023 main conference proceedings (to appear)

Abstract: A proper evaluation of stories generated for a sequence of images -- the task commonly referred to as visual storytelling -- must consider multiple aspects, such as coherence, grammatical correctness, and visual grounding. In this work, we focus on evaluating the degree of grounding, that is, the extent to which a story is about the entities shown in the images. We analyze current metrics, both designed for this purpose and for general vision-text alignment. Given their observed shortcomings, we propose a novel evaluation tool, GROOViST, that accounts for cross-modal dependencies, temporal misalignments (the fact that the order in which entities appear in the story and the image sequence may not match), and human intuitions on visual grounding. An additional advantage of GROOViST is its modular design, where the contribution of each component can be assessed and interpreted individually.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.17770v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "GROOViST: A Metric for Grounding Objects in Visual Storytelling," authors Aditya K Surikuchi, Sandro Pezzelle, and Raquel Fernández delve into the evaluation of stories generated for a sequence of images. This task is known as visual storytelling and it requires considering various aspects such as coherence, grammatical correctness, and visual grounding. The authors emphasize the importance of evaluating the degree of grounding in these stories - how well they align with the entities depicted in the images. They conduct a thorough analysis of existing metrics designed for this purpose as well as those intended for general vision-text alignment. Identifying shortcomings in current evaluation methods, they introduce GROOViST - a novel tool that addresses cross-modal dependencies, temporal misalignments, and human intuitions regarding visual grounding. One key advantage of GROOViST is its modular design which allows researchers to assess and interpret each component individually. This approach enhances the granularity and accuracy of evaluations in visual storytelling tasks. The authors' work will be presented at EMNLP 2023 main conference proceedings showcasing their contribution to advancing evaluation methodologies in this field.
Created on 04 Feb. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.