Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.20501v1

In this paper, the authors address the pressing and emerging problem of the impact of generated content on information retrieval (IR) systems in the era of large language models (LLMs). They introduce two new benchmarks, SciFact+AIGC and NQ320K+AIGC, to evaluate IR models in scenarios where both human-written and LLM-generated texts are involved. Through extensive experiments, they uncover an unexpected bias of neural retrieval models favoring LLM-generated text, which they refer to as "source bias". The authors provide an in-depth analysis of this bias from the perspective of text compression. They observe that LLM-generated texts tend to have more focused semantics with less noise compared to human-written texts, making them more suitable for precise semantic similarity calculations. This difference in semantic concentration contributes to the observed bias in neural IR models. Furthermore, the authors discuss the crucial concerns and potential risks of this bias to the entire web ecosystem. They emphasize the need to mitigate the source bias and ensure sustainable development in the face of LLMs' influence. Additionally, they suggest exploring whether this bias manifests in other information systems beyond IR such as recommender and advertising systems. The authors also highlight that neural models may exhibit biases not only towards generated text but also other data modalities like images and multimodal content. They propose investigating the source bias on tasks beyond texts such as image-text retrieval especially considering emerging generative models capable of generating high-quality images. Overall, this research provides valuable insights into several promising directions for future exploration. It raises important questions about mitigating biases caused by LLMs' influence on information systems and highlights potential risks associated with these biases. The findings serve as a critical wake-up call to the IR community and beyond. To facilitate further research in IR during the LLM era, the authors have constructed two new benchmarks and made them available along with their codes on GitHub.

• - Authors address the impact of generated content on information retrieval (IR) systems in the era of large language models (LLMs)
• - Introduce two new benchmarks, SciFact+AIGC and NQ320K+AIGC, to evaluate IR models with human-written and LLM-generated texts
• - Uncover "source bias" in neural retrieval models favoring LLM-generated text
• - Bias attributed to semantic concentration and less noise in LLM-generated texts
• - Discuss concerns and risks of source bias to the web ecosystem
• - Suggest exploring bias manifestation in other information systems beyond IR
• - Highlight biases towards other data modalities like images and multimodal content
• - Propose investigating source bias on tasks beyond texts, such as image-text retrieval
• - Research provides insights for future exploration, raises questions about mitigating biases caused by LLMs' influence, highlights potential risks associated with these biases
• - Two new benchmarks available on GitHub for further research in IR during the LLM era.

This research talks about how the information we find online can be influenced by big language models. They created two tests to see how well different models can find information in human-written text and text generated by these models. They found that the models tend to favor the generated text, which can have biases because it is more focused and less messy. They also talked about how this bias can affect the internet and suggested looking for bias in other types of information like images. The research gives us ideas for future studies and warns about the risks of these biases. You can find the tests they made on a website called GitHub." Definitions- Generated content: Text or information that is created by a computer program or algorithm. - Information retrieval (IR) systems: Systems or methods used to search for and find specific information within a large amount of data. - Large language models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that are trained to understand and generate human-like text. - Benchmarks: Tests or standards used to evaluate the performance of something. - Source bias: A tendency for a model or system to favor certain sources or types of information over others. - Semantic concentration: When text or information is focused on one specific topic or idea. - Noise: Unwanted or irrelevant information that makes it harder to understand something. - Web ecosystem: The interconnected network of websites, users, and content on the internet. - Modalities: Different forms or types of data, such as text, images, videos, etc. - Mit

Exploring the Impact of Generated Content on Information Retrieval Systems

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly powerful and capable of generating high-quality content. This has raised important questions about their impact on information retrieval (IR) systems. In a new research paper, the authors address this pressing issue by introducing two new benchmarks to evaluate IR models in scenarios where both human-written and LLM-generated texts are involved. Through extensive experiments, they uncover an unexpected bias of neural retrieval models favoring LLM-generated text which they refer to as "source bias". The authors provide an in-depth analysis of this source bias from the perspective of text compression and discuss its implications for the entire web ecosystem.

Introducing Two New Benchmarks

The authors introduce two new benchmarks, SciFact+AIGC and NQ320K+AIGC, to evaluate IR models when both human-written and LLM-generated texts are present. These datasets contain a mix of human written documents such as scientific papers or news articles along with generated documents created using GPT2 model trained on Wikipedia data. To measure how well these IR models can distinguish between human written and generated texts, each dataset contains a set of queries that ask whether a given document is real or generated.

Uncovering Source Bias

Through extensive experiments with these datasets, the authors uncover an unexpected bias towards LLM-generated text among neural retrieval models. They observe that these models tend to favor generated text over human written documents even when there is no significant difference in relevance scores between them. This phenomenon is referred to as “source bias” since it implies that neural retrieval models are biased towards certain sources like LLMs over others like humans when making decisions about relevance scores for different types of documents.

Analyzing Source Bias From Text Compression Perspective

To further understand why this source bias exists, the authors analyze it from the perspective of text compression techniques such as word embeddings or sentence encoders used by neural IR systems to calculate semantic similarity between query terms and retrieved documents. They observe that compared to human written texts which often contain more noise due to typos or other errors, LLM generated texts tend to have more focused semantics with less noise making them more suitable for precise semantic similarity calculations used by neural IR systems leading them to favor such generated content over human written ones even if they are equally relevant according to traditional metrics like precision@k or nDCG@k scores used in information retrieval tasks .

Implications For Web Ecosystems And Future Exploration Directions

The findings presented in this research raise important questions about mitigating biases caused by LLMs' influence on information systems including recommender and advertising systems beyond just search engines or other IR related tasks . The authors emphasize the need for sustainable development while taking into account potential risks associated with source biases caused by large language models . Additionally , they suggest exploring whether similar biases manifest not only in textual data but also other modalities such as images especially considering emerging generative image synthesis techniques capable of producing high quality images . Finally , they propose investigating source biases across various tasks beyond just information retrieval such as image -text matching problems .

Conclusion

Overall , this research provides valuable insights into several promising directions for future exploration related to large language model's influence on information systems . It raises important questions about mitigating biases caused by these powerful tools while emphasizing potential risks associated with them . To facilitate further research during this era , the authors have constructed two new benchmarks containing both real and generated documents along with their codes available publicly via GitHub repository .