Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2311.16479v1

In their paper titled "Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision," Zhiyang Chen, Yousong Zhu, Yufei Zhan, Zhaowen Li, Chaoyang Zhao, Jinqiao Wang, and Ming Tang address the issue of hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs). These models often generate responses that contradict the image content due to their weak ability to comprehend detailed information in a multi-modal context. The authors identify two main factors contributing to this problem: the training data's focus on global descriptions and the auto-regressive loss function's bias towards text modeling rather than image understanding. To overcome these limitations, the authors propose several strategies. Firstly, they introduce more detailed vision annotations and employ more discriminative vision models to enhance the training of LVLMs. This approach aims to generate more precise responses without encountering hallucination. They generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations using the panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG). These conversations emphasize detailed facts in the image, encouraging the model to answer questions based on multi-modal contexts. Additionally, the authors integrate self-attention mechanism (SAM) and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision during training. This forces LVLMs to develop a capacity for identifying context-related objects, leading to more accurate responses and mitigating hallucination. To provide a comprehensive evaluation of hallucination in LVLMs, the authors propose a new benchmark called RAH-Bench. This benchmark categorizes vision hallucination into three types: those that contradict the image with wrong categories, attributes or relations. It also introduces False Positive Rate as a detailed sub-metric for each type. The authors' approach demonstrates an +8.4% enhancement compared to the original LLaVA model and achieves widespread performance improvements across other models. Overall, this paper presents effective strategies for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs by incorporating more detailed vision annotations, discriminative vision models and auxiliary supervision. The proposed RAH-Bench benchmark provides a comprehensive evaluation of hallucination enabling further advancements in this field.

• - Large vision-language models (LVLMs) often generate responses that contradict the image content
• - Two main factors contributing to this problem: focus on global descriptions in training data and bias towards text modeling in loss function
• - Proposed strategies to overcome limitations:
• - Introduce more detailed vision annotations and employ discriminative vision models for enhanced training
• - Generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations using panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG)
• - Integrate self-attention mechanism (SAM) and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision during training
• - Proposed benchmark called RAH-Bench categorizes vision hallucination into three types: wrong categories, attributes, or relations
• - Demonstrated +8.4% enhancement compared to original LLaVA model and widespread performance improvements across other models
• - Effective strategies include incorporating detailed vision annotations, discriminative vision models, and auxiliary supervision

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) are computer programs that can understand and generate both images and text. Sometimes these models give responses that don't match the pictures they see. There are two main reasons why this happens: first, the models focus too much on general descriptions instead of specific details in their training data. Second, the models are biased towards understanding text more than images. To fix this problem, researchers have come up with some strategies. They suggest adding more detailed information about what is in the pictures and using special models that can better understand images. They also propose using a dataset called PSG to create pairs of images and text with clear relationships between them. Additionally, they suggest using a technique called self-attention mechanism and mask prediction loss during training to help improve the model's understanding. The researchers have created a benchmark called RAH-Bench to categorize different types of mistakes made by these models, such as getting the wrong categories, attributes, or relationships in their responses. They have shown that their proposed strategies can improve the performance of these models by 8.4% compared to the original model called LLaVA. Overall, effective strategies for improving these vision-language models include adding more detailed information about images, using special image understanding models, and providing extra guidance during training."

Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision

In their paper titled "Mitigating Hallucination in Visual Language Models with Visual Supervision," Zhiyang Chen, Yousong Zhu, Yufei Zhan, Zhaowen Li, Chaoyang Zhao, Jinqiao Wang, and Ming Tang address the issue of hallucination in large vision-language models (LVLMs). These models often generate responses that contradict the image content due to their weak ability to comprehend detailed information in a multi-modal context. The authors identify two main factors contributing to this problem: the training data's focus on global descriptions and the auto-regressive loss function's bias towards text modeling rather than image understanding. To overcome these limitations, they propose several strategies for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs.

Detailed Vision Annotations

The authors introduce more detailed vision annotations and employ more discriminative vision models to enhance the training of LVLMs. This approach aims to generate more precise responses without encountering hallucination. They generate image-text pairs with detailed relationship annotations using the panoptic scene graph dataset (PSG). These conversations emphasize detailed facts in the image, encouraging the model to answer questions based on multi-modal contexts.

Auxiliary Supervision

Additionally, they integrate self-attention mechanism (SAM) and mask prediction loss as auxiliary supervision during training. This forces LVLMs to develop a capacity for identifying context-related objects, leading to more accurate responses and mitigating hallucination.

RAH Benchmark

To provide a comprehensive evaluation of hallucination in LVLMs, the authors propose a new benchmark called RAH-Bench. This benchmark categorizes vision hallucination into three types: those that contradict the image with wrong categories, attributes or relations. It also introduces False Positive Rate as a detailed sub-metric for each type. The authors' approach demonstrates an +8.4% enhancement compared to the original LLaVA model and achieves widespread performance improvements across other models.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper presents effective strategies for mitigating hallucination in LVLMs by incorporating more detailed vision annotations, discriminative vision models and auxiliary supervision. The proposed RAH-Bench benchmark provides a comprehensive evaluation of hallucination enabling further advancements in this field