Context Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Generation

AI-generated keywords: Context Tuning Retrieval Augmented Generation Large Language Models Reciprocal Rank Fusion Synthetic User Profiles

AI-generated Key Points

  • Context Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances RAG-based planning with context-seeking capabilities
  • Comparison of retrieval methods on lightweight models and Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Effectiveness of context tuning in improving contextual understanding
  • CoT augmentation enhances context retrieval without fine-tuning, while fine-tuning eliminates the need for CoT augmentation
  • Context augmentation at plan generation stage reduces hallucinations
  • Lightweight model using Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) with LambdaMART outperforms GPT-4-based system
  • Limitations of the model: no utilization of conversation history, hindering handling of explicit multi-turn instructions; limited capability to process complex tasks requiring multi-hop context retrieval
  • Performance of planner model constrained by length of context window; longer windows improve performance but increase size and complexity
  • Incorporating context compression techniques could improve end-to-end performance without increasing model size significantly
  • Synthetic user profiles and personas generated due to privacy constraints for real-world data simulation
  • Emphasis on ethical considerations by exclusively using synthetically generated data instead of real user information
  • Conclusion: Context Tuning for RAG improves tool retrieval and plan generation through enhanced contextual understanding; significant improvements in semantic search and LLM-based planner accuracy demonstrated.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Raviteja Anantha, Tharun Bethi, Danil Vodianik, Srinivas Chappidi

preprint version
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have the remarkable ability to solve new tasks with just a few examples, but they need access to the right tools. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this problem by retrieving a list of relevant tools for a given task. However, RAG's tool retrieval step requires all the required information to be explicitly present in the query. This is a limitation, as semantic search, the widely adopted tool retrieval method, can fail when the query is incomplete or lacks context. To address this limitation, we propose Context Tuning for RAG, which employs a smart context retrieval system to fetch relevant information that improves both tool retrieval and plan generation. Our lightweight context retrieval model uses numerical, categorical, and habitual usage signals to retrieve and rank context items. Our empirical results demonstrate that context tuning significantly enhances semantic search, achieving a 3.5-fold and 1.5-fold improvement in Recall@K for context retrieval and tool retrieval tasks respectively, and resulting in an 11.6% increase in LLM-based planner accuracy. Additionally, we show that our proposed lightweight model using Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) with LambdaMART outperforms GPT-4 based retrieval. Moreover, we observe context augmentation at plan generation, even after tool retrieval, reduces hallucination.

Submitted to arXiv on 09 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.05708v1

The paper introduces Context Tuning for Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), a novel component that enhances RAG-based planning by equipping it with essential context-seeking capabilities to address incomplete or under-specified queries. The authors compare various retrieval methods applied to both lightweight models and Large Language Models (LLMs) and demonstrate the effectiveness of context tuning in improving contextual understanding. The study shows that CoT augmentation enhances context retrieval when fine-tuning is not applied, while fine-tuning the retrieval model eliminates the need for CoT augmentation. Additionally, context augmentation at the plan generation stage reduces hallucinations. The proposed lightweight model using Reciprocal Rank Fusion (RRF) with LambdaMART outperforms the GPT-4-based system. Furthermore, the model does not utilize conversation history, which hinders its ability to handle explicit multi-turn instructions containing anaphora or ellipsis. It also limits its capability to effectively process and respond to complex tasks requiring multi-hop context retrieval. Furthermore, the performance of the planner model is constrained by the length of the context window. While longer context windows can enhance performance, they increase model size and computational complexity. Incorporating context compression techniques could potentially improve end-to-end performance without significantly increasing model size. To simulate real-world data, synthetic user profiles and personas were generated due to privacy constraints. The study emphasizes ethical considerations by exclusively utilizing synthetically generated data instead of real user information. In conclusion, Context Tuning for RAG improves tool retrieval and plan generation by enhancing contextual understanding through smart context retrieval. The empirical results demonstrate significant improvements in semantic search and LLM-based planner accuracy.
Created on 17 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.