Dense X Retrieval: What Retrieval Granularity Should We Use?

AI-generated keywords: Proposition Retrieval Dense Retrieval Question Answering Dual-Encoder Architecture Error Case Study

AI-generated Key Points

  • Proposition retrieval outperforms passage or sentence-based methods in both passage retrieval accuracy and downstream QA performance
  • FACTOIDWIKI is an indexed version of the English Wikipedia dump, segmented into 250 million propositions
  • Proposition retrieval demonstrates higher success rates compared to sentence and passage retrieval methods within the range of 100-200 words
  • Passage-level retrieval struggles with entity ambiguity and references, while sentence-based retrieval lacks context
  • Proposition-based retrieval ensures each unit contains one factoid and necessary context
  • Proposition-based retrieval faces challenges with questions involving multi-hop reasoning over long-range textual analysis
  • Recent works on dense retrievers typically adopt a dual-encoder architecture to improve retrieval performance
  • This study provides insights into the impact of different types of retrievals on dense retrievals and downstream QA tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tong Chen, Hongwei Wang, Sihao Chen, Wenhao Yu, Kaixin Ma, Xinran Zhao, Hongming Zhang, Dong Yu

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Dense retrieval has become a prominent method to obtain relevant context or world knowledge in open-domain NLP tasks. When we use a learned dense retriever on a retrieval corpus at inference time, an often-overlooked design choice is the retrieval unit in which the corpus is indexed, e.g. document, passage, or sentence. We discover that the retrieval unit choice significantly impacts the performance of both retrieval and downstream tasks. Distinct from the typical approach of using passages or sentences, we introduce a novel retrieval unit, proposition, for dense retrieval. Propositions are defined as atomic expressions within text, each encapsulating a distinct factoid and presented in a concise, self-contained natural language format. We conduct an empirical comparison of different retrieval granularity. Our results reveal that proposition-based retrieval significantly outperforms traditional passage or sentence-based methods in dense retrieval. Moreover, retrieval by proposition also enhances the performance of downstream QA tasks, since the retrieved texts are more condensed with question-relevant information, reducing the need for lengthy input tokens and minimizing the inclusion of extraneous, irrelevant information.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Dec. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.06648v2

In the conclusion of their study, the authors propose the use of propositions as retrieval units for indexing a corpus in order to improve dense retrieval performance. They conducted experiments on five open-domain question answering (QA) datasets with six different dense retrievers and found that retrieval by proposition outperforms passage or sentence-based methods in both passage retrieval accuracy and downstream QA performance. They also introduced FACTOIDWIKI, an indexed version of the English Wikipedia dump, where text from 6 million pages is segmented into 250 million propositions. The authors hope that FACTOIDWIKI, along with their findings, will facilitate future research on information retrieval. The results showed that proposition retrieval demonstrates a higher success rate compared to sentence and passage retrieval methods for a fixed retrieved word budget. The most significant improvement of proposition retrieval over passage retrieval occurs within the range of 100-200 words. As the word count further increases, the recall rates of all three granularities converge since all question-relevant information is included in the retrieved text. In an error case study, it was observed that passage-level retrieval struggles with entity ambiguity and references while sentence-based retrieval faces challenges due to lack of context. On the other hand, proposition-based retrieval tackles these problems by ensuring each unit contains one factoid and necessary context is incorporated in propositions. However, proposition-based retrieval faces challenges with questions involving multi-hop reasoning over long-range textual analysis. The related work section highlights recent works on dense retrievers that typically adopt a dual-encoder architecture which has been used to improve retrieval performance in various tasks. Overall, this study provides insights into the impact of choice of different types of retrievals on dense retrievals and downstream QA tasks demonstrating promising results for using propositions as a unit for retrieving information which opens avenues for further research in information retrieval.
Created on 21 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.