A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Retrofit Attribution High Entropy Word Spotting Retrieval Augmented Generation Self-Reflection.

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in generating human-like text.
  • A major challenge is the tendency of LLMs to generate content that appears factual but lacks grounding, known as hallucination.
  • Retrofit Attribution using Research and Revision (RARR) automates the attribution process for any text generation model, enhancing attribution and improving reliability.
  • High Entropy Word Spotting and Replacement identifies high entropy words in generated content and replaces them with a lower Hallucination Vulnerability Index-based LLM, reducing hallucinations effectively.
  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) integrates a pre-trained sequence-to-sequence transformer with a dense vector index of Wikipedia accessed through the Dense Passage Retriever (DPR), improving the quality and accuracy of generated text.
  • Interactive self-reflection methodology tackles problematic answers and reduces hallucinations by integrating knowledge acquisition and answer generation through iterative feedback processes.
  • These techniques address different aspects of hallucination mitigation in LLMs and provide practical solutions for enhancing reliability and reducing biases in generated text.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: S. M Towhidul Islam Tonmoy, S M Mehedi Zaman, Vinija Jain, Anku Rani, Vipula Rawte, Aman Chadha, Amitava Das

arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2311.09677, arXiv:2308.11764 by other authors
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in their ability to write human-like text, a key challenge remains around their tendency to hallucinate generating content that appears factual but is ungrounded. This issue of hallucination is arguably the biggest hindrance to safely deploying these powerful LLMs into real-world production systems that impact people's lives. The journey toward widespread adoption of LLMs in practical settings heavily relies on addressing and mitigating hallucinations. Unlike traditional AI systems focused on limited tasks, LLMs have been exposed to vast amounts of online text data during training. While this allows them to display impressive language fluency, it also means they are capable of extrapolating information from the biases in training data, misinterpreting ambiguous prompts, or modifying the information to align superficially with the input. This becomes hugely alarming when we rely on language generation capabilities for sensitive applications, such as summarizing medical records, financial analysis reports, etc. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of over 32 techniques developed to mitigate hallucination in LLMs. Notable among these are Retrieval Augmented Generation (Lewis et al, 2021), Knowledge Retrieval (Varshney et al,2023), CoNLI (Lei et al, 2023), and CoVe (Dhuliawala et al, 2023). Furthermore, we introduce a detailed taxonomy categorizing these methods based on various parameters, such as dataset utilization, common tasks, feedback mechanisms, and retriever types. This classification helps distinguish the diverse approaches specifically designed to tackle hallucination issues in LLMs. Additionally, we analyze the challenges and limitations inherent in these techniques, providing a solid foundation for future research in addressing hallucinations and related phenomena within the realm of LLMs.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jan. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2401.01313v1

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advancements in generating human-like text. However, a major challenge that persists is the tendency of LLMs to generate content that appears factual but lacks grounding, also known as hallucination. This issue hinders the safe deployment of LLMs in real-world applications that impact people's lives. To address this challenge, various techniques have been developed. One technique called Retrofit Attribution using Research and Revision (RARR) automates the attribution process for any text generation model. It conducts research and post-editing to align generated content with retrieved evidence while preserving original qualities. RARR enhances attribution and improves the reliability of LLM outputs. Another technique involves High Entropy Word Spotting and Replacement, which utilizes open-source LLMs to identify high entropy words in generated content. These words are then replaced using a lower Hallucination Vulnerability Index-based LLM, reducing hallucinations effectively. The paper also introduces an end-to-end process called Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). It integrates a pre-trained sequence-to-sequence transformer with a dense vector index of Wikipedia accessed through the Dense Passage Retriever (DPR). The DPR acts as a neural retriever, supplying relevant documents based on the input query. These documents are used by the seq2seq model to generate the final output, improving the quality and accuracy of generated text. Additionally, there is a focus on tackling problematic answers and reducing hallucinations through an interactive self-reflection methodology. This approach integrates knowledge acquisition and answer generation, progressively improving factuality, consistency, and entailment of generated answers through iterative feedback processes. These techniques address different aspects of hallucination mitigation in LLMs and provide practical solutions for enhancing reliability and reducing biases in generated text. The paper provides a comprehensive survey of these techniques along with their challenges and limitations.
Created on 03 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.