DTS-SQL: Decomposed Text-to-SQL with Small Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Performance discrepancies Text-to-SQL task Large Language Models (LLMs) Ethical considerations Schema-linking tasks

AI-generated Key Points

  • Performance discrepancies between small open-source models and large proprietary models in the text-to-SQL task
  • Reliance on proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs) raises data privacy concerns
  • Proposal of a novel two-stage fine-tuning approach to bridge the performance gap and reduce dependence on LLMs
  • Approach enhances execution accuracy by 3 to 7 percent, aligning open-source model performance with proprietary counterparts
  • Emphasis on ethical considerations throughout the research process, including minimizing biases and discriminatory elements
  • Future investigations could focus on refining different stages within the proposed approach and exploring advanced techniques for schema-linking tasks, such as leveraging larger language models like GPT-4.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Mohammadreza Pourreza, Davood Rafiei

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Leading models for the text-to-SQL task heavily rely on proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs), posing concerns over data privacy. Closing the performance gap between small open-source models and large proprietary models is crucial to mitigate this reliance. To this end, we introduce a novel two-stage fine-tuning approach that decomposes the task into two simpler tasks. Through comprehensive evaluation on two large cross-domain datasets and two small LLMs, we show that this approach improves execution accuracy by 3 to 7 percent, effectively aligning the performance of open-source models with their proprietary counterparts.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.01117v1

In this study, we address the issue of performance discrepancies between small open-source models and large proprietary models in the text-to-SQL task. This is primarily driven by the reliance on proprietary Large Language Models (LLMs), which raises concerns about data privacy. To bridge this performance gap and reduce dependence on LLMs, we propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning approach that breaks down the task into simpler components. Through extensive evaluation on diverse datasets and small LLMs, we demonstrate that our approach enhances execution accuracy by 3 to 7 percent, effectively aligning the performance of open-source models with their proprietary counterparts. Furthermore, our research highlights the importance of ethical considerations throughout every phase of our work. We have taken proactive measures to minimize biases and discriminatory elements in our research design, data selection, and result interpretation. By adhering to ethical principles and guidelines, we aim to contribute responsibly to knowledge advancement in our field. Moving forward, future investigations could focus on refining the performance of different stages within our proposed approach and exploring advanced techniques for schema-linking tasks. This includes investigating retrieval methods or leveraging larger language models like GPT-4 for schema-linking tasks to identify optimal methodologies for enhancing overall system performance. Through transparent reporting and dedication to fairness in research practices, we underscore our commitment to conducting research with integrity and respect for ethical standards.
Created on 22 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.