MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study titled "MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation"
  • Authors: Dongjun Lee, Choongwon Park, Jaehyuk Kim, Heesoo Park from Dunamu
  • Introduces a novel approach leveraging multiple prompts to enhance search space for answers
  • Key innovation in refining database schema through schema linking using multiple prompts
  • Generates candidate SQL queries based on refined schema and diverse prompts
  • Filters candidate queries based on confidence scores, selects optimal query through multiple-choice selection
  • Achieves impressive execution accuracies of 65.5% and 89.6% on BIRD and Spider benchmarks respectively
  • Surpasses previous ICL-based methods in accuracy
  • Establishes new state-of-the-art performance on BIRD in terms of both accuracy and efficiency
  • Promising approach to enhancing text-to-SQL generation by leveraging multiple prompts and incorporating sophisticated multiple-choice selection mechanism
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Dongjun Lee, Choongwon Park, Jaehyuk Kim, Heesoo Park

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have enabled in-context learning (ICL)-based methods that significantly outperform fine-tuning approaches for text-to-SQL tasks. However, their performance is still considerably lower than that of human experts on benchmarks that include complex schemas and queries, such as BIRD. This study considers the sensitivity of LLMs to the prompts and introduces a novel approach that leverages multiple prompts to explore a broader search space for possible answers and effectively aggregate them. Specifically, we robustly refine the database schema through schema linking using multiple prompts. Thereafter, we generate various candidate SQL queries based on the refined schema and diverse prompts. Finally, the candidate queries are filtered based on their confidence scores, and the optimal query is obtained through a multiple-choice selection that is presented to the LLM. When evaluated on the BIRD and Spider benchmarks, the proposed method achieved execution accuracies of 65.5\% and 89.6\%, respectively, significantly outperforming previous ICL-based methods. Moreover, we established a new SOTA performance on the BIRD in terms of both the accuracy and efficiency of the generated queries.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.07467v1

<MCS-SQL>, <Dongjun Lee>, <Choongwon Park>, <Jaehyuk Kim>, <Heesoo Park> The study "MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation" by Dongjun Lee, Choongwon Park, Jaehyuk Kim, and Heesoo Park from Dunamu explores the advancements in large language models (LLMs) for text-to-SQL tasks. The researchers introduce a novel approach that leverages multiple prompts to enhance the search space for answers. The key innovation of the study lies in robustly refining the database schema through schema linking using multiple prompts. This process leads to the generation of various candidate SQL queries based on the refined schema and diverse prompts. These candidate queries are then filtered based on confidence scores, with the optimal query selected through a multiple-choice selection presented to the LLM. When evaluated on challenging benchmarks like BIRD and Spider, the proposed method achieves impressive execution accuracies of 65.5% and 89.6%, respectively, surpassing previous ICL-based methods. Additionally, the study establishes a new state-of-the-art performance on BIRD in terms of both accuracy and efficiency in generating queries. Overall, "MCS-SQL" presents a promising approach to enhancing text-to-SQL generation by leveraging multiple prompts and incorporating a sophisticated multiple-choice selection mechanism for improved query accuracy and efficiency.
Created on 03 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.