Is Mamba Capable of In-Context Learning?
AI-generated Key Points
- Mamba exhibits similar in-context learning (ICL) capabilities as transformer models
- Evaluations on various tasks show that Mamba performs at the same level as transformer models for ICL across both task categories
- Mamba optimizes its internal representations incrementally to solve ICL problems, similar to transformers
- Mamba can be an efficient alternative to transformers for ICL tasks involving longer input sequences
- Transformer models achieve ICL through pre-training without explicit training or fine-tuning, which has generated significant academic interest
- Recent studies have contributed to understanding how transformers implement and learn variants of in-context gradient descent during pre-training
- Mamba matches the performance of transformer models for ICL across both simple function approximation and complex natural language processing problems
- Both Mamba and transformers optimize their internal representations incrementally, suggesting a shared mechanism for effective in-context learning
- Further investigations are required to fully understand the extent of Mamba's ICL capabilities and its potential advantages over transformers
Authors: Riccardo Grazzi, Julien Siems, Simon Schrodi, Thomas Brox, Frank Hutter
Abstract: This work provides empirical evidence that Mamba, a newly proposed selective structured state space model, has similar in-context learning (ICL) capabilities as transformers. We evaluated Mamba on tasks involving simple function approximation as well as more complex natural language processing problems. Our results demonstrate that across both categories of tasks, Mamba matches the performance of transformer models for ICL. Further analysis reveals that like transformers, Mamba appears to solve ICL problems by incrementally optimizing its internal representations. Overall, our work suggests that Mamba can be an efficient alternative to transformers for ICL tasks involving longer input sequences.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.