More Agents Is All You Need

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Sampling-and-Voting Method Performance Enhancement Orthogonal Approach Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors present a novel approach to enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs)
  • Method involves scaling up LLMs based on the number of instantiated agents using sampling-and-voting
  • Approach is orthogonal to existing complicated methods and can be used in conjunction with other techniques
  • Enhancement achieved is correlated with task difficulty level
  • Comprehensive experiments conducted on various LLM benchmarks validate findings
  • Results confirm effectiveness of proposed method and provide insights into its properties
  • Code made publicly available for further exploration and implementation at [https://anonymous.4open.science/r/more_agent_is_all_you_need](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/more_agent_is_all_you_need)
  • Research introduces a straightforward yet effective approach to improving LLM performance by increasing the number of agents through sampling-and-voting
  • Offers practical implications for enhancing natural language processing tasks
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Junyou Li, Qin Zhang, Yangbin Yu, Qiang Fu, Deheng Ye

Abstract: We find that, simply via a sampling-and-voting method, the performance of large language models (LLMs) scales with the number of agents instantiated. Also, this method is orthogonal to existing complicated methods to further enhance LLMs, while the degree of enhancement is correlated to the task difficulty. We conduct comprehensive experiments on a wide range of LLM benchmarks to verify the presence of our finding, and to study the properties that can facilitate its occurrence. Our code is publicly available at: \url{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/more_agent_is_all_you_need}.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.05120v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "More Agents Is All You Need," authors Junyou Li, Qin Zhang, Yangbin Yu, Qiang Fu, and Deheng Ye present a novel approach to enhancing the performance of large language models (LLMs). Their method involves scaling up LLMs based on the number of instantiated agents using a simple sampling-and-voting technique. This approach is orthogonal to existing complicated methods used for enhancing LLMs and can be used in conjunction with other techniques without any conflicts or interference. The degree of enhancement achieved through this method is correlated with the difficulty level of the task at hand. To validate their findings, comprehensive experiments are conducted on various LLM benchmarks. The results confirm the effectiveness of their proposed method and provide insights into its properties. The authors make their code publicly available for further exploration and implementation at: [https://anonymous.4open.science/r/more_agent_is_all_you_need](https://anonymous.4open.science/r/more_agent_is_all_you_need). Overall, this research introduces a straightforward yet effective approach to improving LLM performance by increasing the number of agents through sampling-and-voting. It contributes to our understanding of how different factors impact LLM capabilities and offers practical implications for enhancing natural language processing tasks.
Created on 13 Feb. 2024
Available in other languages: fr

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.