How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysis

AI-generated keywords: Social Interactions Negotiation Large Language Models NegotiationArena Negotiating Strategies

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Negotiation plays a pivotal role in social interactions for navigating various aspects of life.
  • Effective negotiation skills are crucial for haggling over prices and equitable resource distribution.
  • Large language models (LLMs) need adept negotiation abilities as they are increasingly used as proxies for human agents.
  • The study introduces NegotiationArena, a framework to assess and explore LLMs' negotiation prowess.
  • Three distinct scenarios within NegotiationArena scrutinize LLM behaviors: ultimatum games, trading games, and price negotiations.
  • LLM agents strategically leverage behavioral tactics to enhance negotiation outcomes significantly, such as adopting a facade of destitution and desperation to boost payoffs by 20%.
  • The study reveals irrational negotiation behaviors in LLM agents similar to those observed in human negotiators.
  • NegotiationArena provides a novel environment for exploring interactions among LLMs, offering insights into their theory of mind, irrational tendencies, and reasoning capabilities.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Federico Bianchi, Patrick John Chia, Mert Yuksekgonul, Jacopo Tagliabue, Dan Jurafsky, James Zou

Abstract: Negotiation is the basis of social interactions; humans negotiate everything from the price of cars to how to share common resources. With rapidly growing interest in using large language models (LLMs) to act as agents on behalf of human users, such LLM agents would also need to be able to negotiate. In this paper, we study how well LLMs can negotiate with each other. We develop NegotiationArena: a flexible framework for evaluating and probing the negotiation abilities of LLM agents. We implemented three types of scenarios in NegotiationArena to assess LLM's behaviors in allocating shared resources (ultimatum games), aggregate resources (trading games) and buy/sell goods (price negotiations). Each scenario allows for multiple turns of flexible dialogues between LLM agents to allow for more complex negotiations. Interestingly, LLM agents can significantly boost their negotiation outcomes by employing certain behavioral tactics. For example, by pretending to be desolate and desperate, LLMs can improve their payoffs by 20\% when negotiating against the standard GPT-4. We also quantify irrational negotiation behaviors exhibited by the LLM agents, many of which also appear in humans. Together, \NegotiationArena offers a new environment to investigate LLM interactions, enabling new insights into LLM's theory of mind, irrationality, and reasoning abilities.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Feb. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2402.05863v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of social interactions, negotiation plays a pivotal role in navigating various aspects of life. From haggling over prices to determining equitable resource distribution, effective negotiation skills are crucial. As the use of large language models (LLMs) increases as proxies for human agents, it becomes imperative for these LLM agents to possess adept negotiation abilities. This study delves into the efficacy of LLMs engaging in negotiations with one another and presents NegotiationArena - a versatile framework tailored to assess and explore their negotiation prowess. Within NegotiationArena, three distinct scenarios are crafted to scrutinize LLM behaviors across different negotiation contexts: allocating shared resources through ultimatum games, managing aggregate resources via trading games, and facilitating buy/sell transactions in price negotiations. The design allows for multifaceted dialogues between LLM agents over multiple turns, fostering complex negotiation dynamics. Noteworthy findings emerge as LLM agents strategically leverage behavioral tactics to significantly enhance their negotiation outcomes. For instance, adopting a facade of destitution and desperation enables LLMs to bolster their payoffs by 20% when pitted against the standard GPT-4 model. Additionally, this study sheds light on irrational negotiation behaviors exhibited by LLM agents - mirroring similar tendencies observed in human negotiators. By providing a novel environment for exploring interactions among LLMs, NegotiationArena serves as a conduit for unraveling insights into these models' theory of mind, irrational tendencies, and reasoning capabilities. Through meticulous analysis and experimentation within this platform, researchers gain deeper comprehension into the nuances of negotiating strategies employed by LLM agents - paving the way for enhanced understanding and optimization of their negotiation proficiencies.
Created on 27 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.