Can LLMs Generate Architectural Design Decisions? -An Exploratory Empirical study

AI-generated keywords: Architectural Knowledge Management

AI-generated Key Points

Study focuses on Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM) and use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
Utilizes Developer-Intent Driven Code Comment Generation and Automatic Identification of Decisions from developer mailing lists
Tools like ADeX used for automatic curation of design decision knowledge
Evaluation metrics include ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR, and BERTScore
Experiment involves gathering 95 ADRs from repositories like archane-framework, winery, joelparkerhenderson's repository, cardano, and island
LLM models explored include GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, T5 in different sizes (small to XL), T0 models like ada and davinci along with Flan-T5 variants
Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 can generate relevant Design Decisions in a 0-shot setting but fall short of human-level performance
More cost-effective models such as GPT-3.5 show promise in few-shot settings while smaller models like Flan-T5 can yield comparable results after fine-tuning

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rudra Dhar, Karthik Vaidhyanathan, Vasudeva Varma

arXiv: 2403.01709v1 - DOI (cs.SE)

This paper has been accepted to IEEE ICSA 2024 (Main Track - Research Track)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM) involves the organized handling of information related to architectural decisions and design within a project or organization. An essential artifact of AKM is the Architecture Decision Records (ADR), which documents key design decisions. ADRs are documents that capture decision context, decision made and various aspects related to a design decision, thereby promoting transparency, collaboration, and understanding. Despite their benefits, ADR adoption in software development has been slow due to challenges like time constraints and inconsistent uptake. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) may help bridge this adoption gap by facilitating ADR generation. However, the effectiveness of LLM for ADR generation or understanding is something that has not been explored. To this end, in this work, we perform an exploratory study that aims to investigate the feasibility of using LLM for the generation of ADRs given the decision context. In our exploratory study, we utilize GPT and T5-based models with 0-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning approaches to generate the Decision of an ADR given its Context. Our results indicate that in a 0-shot setting, state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4 generate relevant and accurate Design Decisions, although they fall short of human-level performance. Additionally, we observe that more cost-effective models like GPT-3.5 can achieve similar outcomes in a few-shot setting, and smaller models such as Flan-T5 can yield comparable results after fine-tuning. To conclude, this exploratory study suggests that LLM can generate Design Decisions, but further research is required to attain human-level generation and establish standardized widespread adoption.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Mar. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.01709v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

, , , , In this expanded study on Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM) and the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), we delve into the realm of Developer-Intent Driven Code Comment Generation, Automatic Identification of Decisions from developer mailing lists, and tools like ADeX for automatic curation of design decision knowledge. Drawing from foundational works such as the Goal Question Metric Approach by Basili et al. and metrics like ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR, and BERTScore for evaluation, we aim to enhance our understanding of how LLMs can revolutionize ADR generation. Our experimental subject involves gathering ADR data from various repositories like archane-framework, winery, joelparkerhenderson's repository, cardano, and island. Through web crawling and manual extraction processes, we obtained 95 ADRs that adhere to a standard format. Focusing on extracting the Context and Decision components from these ADRs, we aim to leverage LLMs for generating Design Decisions based on given contexts. We explore a range of LLM models including GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, T5 in different sizes (small to XL), T0 models like ada and davinci along with Flan-T5 variants. By experimenting with 0-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning approaches using these models on our extracted ADR data samples as shown in Figure 2 - where Python is chosen as the primary programming language - we assess their effectiveness in generating accurate Design Decisions. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 can generate relevant Design Decisions in a 0-shot setting but fall short of human-level performance. However, more cost-effective models such as GPT-3.5 show promise in few-shot settings while smaller models like Flan-T5 can yield comparable results after fine-tuning. This exploratory study suggests that LLMs have potential for generating Design Decisions but further research is needed to achieve human-level generation and establish standardized widespread adoption in AKM practices.

- Study focuses on Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM) and use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- Utilizes Developer-Intent Driven Code Comment Generation and Automatic Identification of Decisions from developer mailing lists
- Tools like ADeX used for automatic curation of design decision knowledge
- Evaluation metrics include ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR, and BERTScore
- Experiment involves gathering 95 ADRs from repositories like archane-framework, winery, joelparkerhenderson's repository, cardano, and island
- LLM models explored include GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, T5 in different sizes (small to XL), T0 models like ada and davinci along with Flan-T5 variants
- Results show that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 can generate relevant Design Decisions in a 0-shot setting but fall short of human-level performance
- More cost-effective models such as GPT-3.5 show promise in few-shot settings while smaller models like Flan-T5 can yield comparable results after fine-tuning

SummaryThe study looks at how to manage architectural knowledge and use big language models for making decisions about architecture. They use special tools to help generate code comments based on what developers want and find decisions from emails developers send. They also use tools like ADeX to organize design decision knowledge automatically. The study measures how well these methods work using metrics like ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR, and BERTScore. They tested different large language models like GPT-2, GPT-3, and others to see which ones can make good design decisions. Definitions1. Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM): Managing information about how buildings or software systems are designed. 2. Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced computer programs that understand and generate human-like text. 3. Architecture Decision Records (ADRs): Documents that explain why certain design choices were made in a project. 4. Metrics: Tools used to measure the effectiveness or performance of something. 5. Repositories: Places where data or files are stored and organized. 6. Fine-tuning: Adjusting a model's parameters to improve its performance on specific tasks. 7. Few-shot setting: Training a model with only a small amount of data for a particular task. 8. 0-shot setting: Making predictions without any specific training data for that task. These definitions should help you understand the key points of the study in simpler terms!

Introduction

Architectural Knowledge Management (AKM) is a crucial aspect of software development, as it involves capturing and organizing the knowledge related to design decisions made during the development process. This knowledge is essential for maintaining consistency, facilitating communication among team members, and aiding in future decision-making processes. However, managing this knowledge can be a time-consuming and challenging task. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in using Large Language Models (LLMs) for various natural language processing tasks. LLMs are trained on large amounts of text data and have shown impressive performance in tasks such as language translation, text summarization, and question-answering. In this research paper titled "Enhancing Architectural Knowledge Management with Large Language Models," the authors explore the potential use of LLMs for automating some aspects of AKM.

Background

The authors build upon previous works on AKM by incorporating LLMs into the process. They draw from foundational works such as the Goal Question Metric Approach by Basili et al., which provides a framework for evaluating software engineering processes. The authors also utilize metrics like ROUGE, BLEU, METEOR, and BERTScore to evaluate the performance of their models. The study focuses on three main areas: Developer-Intent Driven Code Comment Generation, Automatic Identification of Decisions from developer mailing lists, and tools like ADeX for automatic curation of design decision knowledge.

Data Collection

To conduct their experiments, the authors gathered ADR data from various repositories such as archane-framework, winery, joelparkerhenderson's repository, cardano, and island through web crawling and manual extraction processes. They obtained 95 ADRs that adhere to a standard format.

Experiment Design

The authors focused on extracting two components - Context and Decision - from the ADRs. They then used a range of LLM models, including GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, T5 in different sizes (small to XL), T0 models like ada and davinci along with Flan-T5 variants. The experiments were conducted using three approaches: 0-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning. In the 0-shot approach, the model is given no prior information about the task at hand. In the few-shot approach, a small amount of data is provided to the model before generating predictions. In fine-tuning, the model is trained on a specific dataset related to the task.

Results

The results of this study indicate that state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 can generate relevant Design Decisions in a 0-shot setting but fall short of human-level performance. However, more cost-effective models such as GPT-3.5 show promise in few-shot settings while smaller models like Flan-T5 can yield comparable results after fine-tuning.

Conclusion

This research paper provides valuable insights into how LLMs can be utilized for automating some aspects of AKM. The results suggest that LLMs have potential for generating Design Decisions but further research is needed to achieve human-level generation and establish standardized widespread adoption in AKM practices.

Future Directions

While this study shows promising results for using LLMs in AKM processes, there are still areas that require further exploration. For instance, incorporating more programming languages other than Python could provide a better understanding of how these models perform across different contexts. Additionally, future studies could focus on improving human-level performance by exploring techniques such as transfer learning or ensembling multiple LLMs together.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this research paper highlights the potential of LLMs in enhancing Architectural Knowledge Management. By automating some aspects of AKM, LLMs can save time and effort for software development teams while also improving the consistency and accuracy of design decisions. However, further research is needed to achieve human-level performance and establish standardized adoption in AKM practices.

Created on 07 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.