Impact of unmodeled eccentricity on the tidal deformability measurement and implications for gravitational wave physics inference

Authors: Poulami Dutta Roy, Pankaj Saini

arXiv: 2403.02404v1 - DOI (astro-ph.HE)
13 pages, 4 figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2403.02404v1

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Key points
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
In the era of gravitational wave astronomy, the upcoming third-generation detectors - Cosmic Explorer (CE) and Einstein Telescope (ET) - are poised to revolutionize our understanding of neutron stars (NS) through binary neutron star (BNS) observations. These advanced detectors will enable precise measurements of tidal deformability, shedding light on the equation of state (EoS) governing NS interiors. A recent study by Blanchet et al. (2023) investigated systematic errors due to unmodeled eccentricity in tidal deformability measurements and found that at an eccentricity level of around $10^{-3}$ ($3\times 10^{-4}$) at a reference frequency of 10Hz for CE (ET), these errors can surpass statistical uncertainties and significantly impact NS EoS inference. Furthermore, these biases in tidal deformability parameters can propagate to distortions in source frame NS mass estimates, consequently biasing redshift inferences using the Love siren method. Specifically, for CE, redshift estimations are notably affected at an eccentricity level of approximately $10^{-3$ at 10Hz reference frequency. Moreover, the implications of biased tidal deformability extend beyond NS studies to testing the nature of black holes. The presence of systematic errors can lead to non-zero values for tidal deformability in binary black hole systems, falsely suggesting deviations from Kerr black hole properties. Additionally, incorporating eccentricity into waveform models was shown to increase statistical errors in tidal deformability measurements by a factor less than two. This underscores the importance of utilizing accurate eccentric waveform models for robust gravitational wave parameter inference. Overall, this comprehensive analysis highlights the critical role that accounting for eccentricity plays in refining our understanding of NS properties and gravitational wave physics inference as we enter an exciting new phase in astrophysical research.
AI-generated keywords: Gravitational wave astronomy Third-generation detectors Neutron stars Tidal deformability Eccentricity

AI-generated Key Points

  • Third-generation detectors Cosmic Explorer (CE) and Einstein Telescope (ET) will revolutionize understanding of neutron stars (NS) through binary neutron star (BNS) observations
  • Precise measurements of tidal deformability enabled, shedding light on NS interiors' equation of state (EoS)
  • Study by Blanchet et al. (2023) found systematic errors due to unmodeled eccentricity impacting NS EoS inference at specific levels
  • Biases in tidal deformability parameters can distort source frame NS mass estimates and redshift inferences using Love siren method
  • Systematic errors can lead to non-zero values for tidal deformability in binary black hole systems, falsely suggesting deviations from Kerr black hole properties
  • Incorporating eccentricity into waveform models increases statistical errors in tidal deformability measurements by a factor less than two
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Abstract: With the expected large number of binary neutron star (BNS) observations through gravitational waves (GWs), third-generation GW detectors, Cosmic Explorer (CE) and Einstein Telescope (ET), will be able to constrain the tidal deformability, and hence the equation of state (EoS) of neutron star (NS) with exquisite precision. A subset of the detected BNS systems can retain residual eccentricity in the detector frequency band. We study the systematic errors due to unmodeled eccentricity in the tidal deformability measurement and its implications for NS EoS and redshift measurement via the Love siren method. We find that the systematic errors in the tidal deformability parameter exceed the statistical errors at an eccentricity of $\sim 10^{-3}$ ($\sim 3\times 10^{-4}$) at $10$Hz reference GW frequency for CE (ET). We show that these biases on tidal deformability parameter can significantly bias the NS EoS inference. Furthermore, the error on tidal deformability propagates to the source frame NS mass, which in turn biases the redshift inference. For CE, the redshift inference is significantly biased at an eccentricity of $\sim 10^{-3}$ (at a reference frequency of $10$Hz). We also study the implications of biased tidal deformability in testing the Kerr nature of black holes. Systematic error on the tidal deformability parameter leads to a non-zero value of tidal deformability for binary black holes, indicating a false deviation from the Kerr nature. Finally, we show that including eccentricity in the waveform model increases the statistical errors in tidal deformability measurement by a factor of $\lesssim 2$. Our study, therefore, highlights the importance of using accurate eccentric waveform models for GW parameter inference.

Submitted to arXiv on 04 Mar. 2024

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Export BibTeX · RIS (Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote) · Markdown (Notion, Obsidian) · Premium
Citation alerts Premium
Journal club Slides to present it Premium
For journalists Press kit and hype check Premium

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.