Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2404.09554v1

Generative AI (GenAI) has revolutionized the field of artificial intelligence by shifting its focus from recognizing patterns to generating solutions across a wide range of tasks. This shift has opened up new opportunities and challenges for explainability in AI (XAI). In this research manuscript, we explore the significance of XAI in the era of GenAI and discuss the unique challenges it presents. We also introduce novel desiderata that explanations should meet, including verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost considerations. To address these issues, we conduct a narrative review and draw upon insights from existing surveys on XAI and GenAI. By synthesizing knowledge from various sources, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of XAI for GenAI. Our approach includes developing a taxonomy to categorize existing XAI techniques based on key dimensions that distinguish them. We also highlight the technical backgrounds and motivations for XAI in GenAI. Additionally, we emphasize the need for interactive adjustment of complex outputs generated by AI systems as they become more integrated into society and require user input for evaluation and refinement. Furthermore, we identify gaps in existing literature related to XAI for GenAI and propose a research agenda outlining future directions for investigation. Through addressing these gaps and providing a holistic view of XAI in the context of GenAI, our manuscript aims to serve as a valuable resource for both technical experts and researchers from interdisciplinary fields. Overall, our research contributes to advancing the understanding of explainability in AI systems powered by generative technologies. Through our detailed analysis and taxonomy development, we hope to pave the way for further advancements in XAI for GenAI applications.

• - Generative AI (GenAI) has revolutionized artificial intelligence by shifting focus to generating solutions
• - Importance of explainability in AI (XAI) in the era of GenAI, presenting unique challenges
• - Novel desiderata for explanations: verifiability, interactivity, security, cost considerations
• - Conducting a narrative review and drawing insights from existing surveys on XAI and GenAI
• - Developing a taxonomy to categorize existing XAI techniques based on key dimensions
• - Emphasizing interactive adjustment of complex outputs generated by AI systems for user evaluation and refinement
• - Identifying gaps in existing literature related to XAI for GenAI and proposing future research directions

Summary- GenAI is a special kind of AI that can create solutions on its own. - XAI is about making sure we understand how AI works, which can be tricky with GenAI. - We need explanations to be easy to check, involve us, keep things safe, and not cost too much. - People are looking at past information to learn more about XAI and GenAI. - We want to make a system for organizing different ways of explaining AI. Definitions- Generative AI (GenAI): A type of artificial intelligence that focuses on creating solutions independently. - Explainability in AI (XAI): Ensuring that the workings of artificial intelligence systems are understandable and transparent. - Verifiability: The ability to confirm or prove that something is true or accurate. - Interactivity: Involving active participation or communication between people and machines. - Security: Measures taken to protect against threats or dangers. - Cost considerations: Thinking about how much something will cost before making decisions.

Generative AI (GenAI) has emerged as a game-changing technology in the field of artificial intelligence, shifting its focus from recognizing patterns to generating solutions. This shift has opened up new opportunities and challenges for explainability in AI (XAI). In this research manuscript, we delve into the significance of XAI in the era of GenAI and discuss the unique challenges it presents. We also introduce novel desiderata that explanations should meet, including verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost considerations. The Rise of Generative AI Generative AI is a subset of artificial intelligence that involves using algorithms to create new data or outputs based on existing data. This technology has revolutionized various industries such as healthcare, finance, and entertainment by automating tasks that were previously considered impossible for machines to perform. For example, generative models have been used to generate realistic images and videos, compose music and even write articles. However, with this advancement comes a need for transparency and interpretability in these complex systems. As generative models become more integrated into society and make decisions that affect people's lives, it is crucial to understand how they arrive at their outputs. This is where explainability in AI (XAI) comes into play. The Significance of XAI in the Era of GenAI Explainability refers to the ability to provide understandable reasons or justifications for an AI system's decisions or actions. It enables users to trust and validate the outputs generated by these systems while also providing insights into their inner workings. In the context of GenAI, XAI becomes even more critical due to its ability to produce highly complex outputs without human intervention. Traditional machine learning algorithms are trained on large datasets with predefined rules or features; however, generative models learn directly from raw data without any preconceived notions about what constitutes a "correct" output. Therefore, understanding how these models generate their outputs can be challenging, and XAI plays a crucial role in addressing this challenge. Novel Desiderata for Explanations in GenAI To ensure that explanations provided by AI systems are effective and useful, the authors of this research manuscript propose four desiderata that they should meet: verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost considerations. Verifiability refers to the ability to verify the correctness of an explanation. In other words, it should be possible to validate whether the explanation accurately reflects how the AI system arrived at its decision or output. Interactivity is essential as it allows users to interact with the AI system's outputs and adjust them based on their preferences. This becomes increasingly important as generative models produce more complex outputs that may require human input for evaluation and refinement. Security is another critical aspect when it comes to XAI for GenAI applications. As these systems become more integrated into society and handle sensitive data, it is crucial to ensure that their explanations do not reveal any confidential information or vulnerabilities that could be exploited by malicious actors. Lastly, cost considerations refer to the resources required to generate an explanation. As AI systems become more complex and generate larger volumes of data, providing explanations can be resource-intensive. Therefore, there is a need for efficient methods of generating explanations without compromising their quality. A Comprehensive Understanding through Narrative Review To provide a comprehensive understanding of XAI in the context of GenAI, the authors conducted a narrative review drawing upon insights from existing surveys on both topics. By synthesizing knowledge from various sources, they aim to bridge gaps between different perspectives on XAI for GenAI applications. The review includes developing a taxonomy that categorizes existing XAI techniques based on key dimensions that distinguish them. This taxonomy serves as a valuable resource for technical experts and researchers from interdisciplinary fields who wish to understand different approaches towards explainability in GenAI. Technical Backgrounds and Motivations for XAI in GenAI The authors also highlight the technical backgrounds and motivations for XAI in GenAI. They discuss how different types of generative models, such as autoencoders, variational autoencoders, and generative adversarial networks, present unique challenges for explainability. They also explore the various methods used to generate explanations for these models, including feature attribution techniques and counterfactual explanations. Furthermore, they emphasize the need for interactive adjustment of complex outputs generated by AI systems as they become more integrated into society. This allows users to provide feedback and refine the outputs according to their preferences. Identifying Gaps in Existing Literature and Future Research Directions Through their analysis, the authors identify gaps in existing literature related to XAI for GenAI applications. These include a lack of standardized evaluation metrics for explanations and limited research on cost-effective methods of generating explanations. To address these gaps, they propose a research agenda outlining future directions for investigation. This includes developing new evaluation metrics that consider both accuracy and efficiency while also exploring ways to reduce the resource requirements for generating explanations. Conclusion In conclusion, this research manuscript provides valuable insights into explainability in AI systems powered by generative technologies. By conducting a comprehensive review and developing a taxonomy to categorize existing XAI techniques, it serves as a valuable resource for both technical experts and researchers from interdisciplinary fields. The authors' proposed desiderata highlight important considerations when providing explanations in GenAI applications – verifiability, interactivity, security, and cost considerations. Through addressing gaps in existing literature and proposing future research directions, this manuscript contributes towards advancing our understanding of XAI in the era of GenAI. As generative models continue to evolve and become more prevalent in our daily lives, it is crucial to prioritize explainability to ensure transparency and trust between humans and machines.