Guidelines for evaluation of complex multi agent test scenarios

AI-generated keywords: Autonomous Vehicles Testing Guidelines Complex Scenarios Singapore Traffic Risk Management

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Comprehensive guideline created by CETRAN to support testing of autonomous vehicles (AVs)
  • Focus on evaluating complex multi-agent test scenarios in a structured manner
  • Dissecting challenges faced by AVs in perception, situation awareness, and decision-making capabilities
  • Guidelines consist of elements for assessing scenario complexity and evaluating AV behavior
  • Tool to challenge risk management abilities of AVs in scenario-based testing or real-world traffic situations
  • Evaluation of five real events on Singapore roads using Resembler webtool data
  • Design of four simulation scenarios by CETRAN team to illustrate potential challenges faced by automated driving systems (ADS)
  • Study provides insights into understanding and managing complexity for AVs
  • Offers practical guidance for assessing AV performance under varying conditions
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ana Isabel Garcia Guerra, Teng Sung Shiuan

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: To support the testing of AVs, CETRAN has created a guideline for the evaluation of complex multi agent test scenarios presented in this report. This allows for a clear structured manner in evaluating complexity elements based on the corresponding difficulties an AV might encounter in Singapore traffic. This study aims to understand the source of complexity for AVs from traffic hazard, by breaking down the difficulties on AV capabilities as perception, situation awareness and decision-making. Guidelines created through this study are composed by a list of elements to be considered in the future as selection criteria to evaluate complexity of scenarios to support AV behaviour assessment. This study is intended to be a guide to understand the sources of complexity for Avs and can be used to challenge the risk management ability of autonomous vehicles in a scenario-based test approach or traffic situations faced on road trials. The report includes the usage of the guidelines created as application to evaluate the complexity of a set of 5 real events that occur on Singapore roads from Resembler webtool which is a database of real human accidents/incidents. Four scenarios were also designed for creation in simulation by the CETRAN team, applying the guidelines for complexity elements created in this work, to illustrate the difficulties an ADS could experience with such scenarios.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 May. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.10526v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Guidelines for evaluation of complex multi agent test scenarios," authors Ana Isabel Garcia Guerra and Teng Sung Shiuan present a comprehensive guideline created by CETRAN to support the testing of autonomous vehicles (AVs). The guideline aims to evaluate complex multi-agent test scenarios in a structured manner, focusing on the difficulties AVs may encounter in Singapore traffic. By dissecting the challenges faced by AVs in terms of perception, situation awareness, and decision-making capabilities, the study seeks to understand the sources of complexity arising from traffic hazards. The guidelines developed through this research consist of a list of elements that can be used as selection criteria to assess the complexity of scenarios and support the evaluation of AV behavior. This framework serves as a tool to challenge the risk management abilities of autonomous vehicles in scenario-based testing approaches or real-world traffic situations encountered during road trials. The report utilizes these guidelines to evaluate the complexity of five real events occurring on Singapore roads using data from Resembler webtool, which catalogues real human accidents/incidents. Additionally, four scenarios were designed by the CETRAN team for simulation purposes, applying the complexity elements outlined in the guidelines to illustrate potential challenges faced by automated driving systems (ADS) in such scenarios. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into understanding and managing complexity for AVs, offering practical guidance for assessing their performance under varying conditions. The findings contribute to enhancing safety measures and optimizing autonomous vehicle technology for future deployment on public roads.
Created on 22 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.