Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Reactive Planning with Large Language Models

AI-generated keywords: Anomaly Detection

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors introduce a two-stage reasoning framework for enhancing trustworthiness of dynamic robotic systems
  • Large language models (LLMs) trained on vast internet-scale data are used for zero-shot generalization capabilities crucial for detecting and mitigating out-of-distribution failure modes in robotics
  • Primary challenges addressed include significant computational expense associated with LLMs and integration of anomaly detection judgments into safe control framework
  • Proposed framework includes fast binary anomaly classifier operating in LLM embedding space and slower fallback selection process leveraging generative LLMs' reasoning abilities
  • Model predictive control strategy ensures safety by maintaining feasibility across various fallback plans once an anomaly is detected
  • Fast anomaly classifier surpasses autoregressive reasoning using state-of-the-art GPT models, even with relatively small language models, enhancing reliability of dynamic robotic systems like quadrotors or autonomous vehicles under resource and time constraints
  • Videos showcasing implementation available on project page; research accepted for presentation at Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) 2024
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rohan Sinha, Amine Elhafsi, Christopher Agia, Matthew Foutter, Edward Schmerling, Marco Pavone

Accepted to Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) 2024

Abstract: Foundation models, e.g., large language models (LLMs), trained on internet-scale data possess zero-shot generalization capabilities that make them a promising technology towards detecting and mitigating out-of-distribution failure modes of robotic systems. Fully realizing this promise, however, poses two challenges: (i) mitigating the considerable computational expense of these models such that they may be applied online, and (ii) incorporating their judgement regarding potential anomalies into a safe control framework. In this work, we present a two-stage reasoning framework: First is a fast binary anomaly classifier that analyzes observations in an LLM embedding space, which may then trigger a slower fallback selection stage that utilizes the reasoning capabilities of generative LLMs. These stages correspond to branch points in a model predictive control strategy that maintains the joint feasibility of continuing along various fallback plans to account for the slow reasoner's latency as soon as an anomaly is detected, thus ensuring safety. We show that our fast anomaly classifier outperforms autoregressive reasoning with state-of-the-art GPT models, even when instantiated with relatively small language models. This enables our runtime monitor to improve the trustworthiness of dynamic robotic systems, such as quadrotors or autonomous vehicles, under resource and time constraints. Videos illustrating our approach in both simulation and real-world experiments are available on this project page: https://sites.google.com/view/aesop-llm.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.08735v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Real-Time Anomaly Detection and Reactive Planning with Large Language Models," authors Rohan Sinha, Amine Elhafsi, Christopher Agia, Matthew Foutter, Edward Schmerling, and Marco Pavone introduce a novel two-stage reasoning framework aimed at enhancing the trustworthiness of dynamic robotic systems. The foundation models utilized in this work are large language models (LLMs) trained on vast amounts of internet-scale data, which endow them with zero-shot generalization capabilities crucial for detecting and mitigating out-of-distribution failure modes in robotics. The primary challenges addressed by the authors include the significant computational expense associated with these LLMs and the integration of their anomaly detection judgments into a safe control framework. To tackle these issues, the proposed framework consists of a fast binary anomaly classifier that operates in an LLM embedding space to quickly analyze observations. This initial stage can then trigger a slower fallback selection process that leverages the reasoning abilities of generative LLMs. These stages serve as branch points within a model predictive control strategy designed to ensure safety by maintaining feasibility across various fallback plans once an anomaly is detected. Notably, the authors demonstrate that their fast anomaly classifier surpasses autoregressive reasoning using state-of-the-art GPT models, even when employing relatively small language models. This advancement enables their runtime monitor to enhance the reliability of dynamic robotic systems such as quadrotors or autonomous vehicles under constraints related to resources and time. Additionally, videos showcasing the implementation of this approach in both simulation environments and real-world experiments are available on the project page provided. This research has been accepted for presentation at Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS) 2024, highlighting its significance in advancing real-time anomaly detection and reactive planning methodologies utilizing large language models for ensuring safety in robotic applications.
Created on 13 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.