Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2405.14333v1

, , , , Proof assistants, such as Lean, have revolutionized mathematical proof verification by ensuring accuracy and reliability. However, the progress of large language models (LLMs) in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this challenge, a novel approach has been introduced to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This innovative method involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs to create synthetic data. By fine-tuning the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this dataset comprising 8 million formal statements with proofs, remarkable advancements have been achieved. like Lean have transformed the landscape of mathematical by ensuring high accuracy and reliability. While show promise in mathematical reasoning, their progress in formal is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this challenge, a novel approach has been introduced to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This innovative method involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs to create synthetic data. By fine-tuning the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this synthetic dataset comprising 8 million formal statements with proofs, remarkable advancements have been achieved. The model demonstrated whole-proof generation accuracies of 46.3% with 64 samples on the Lean 4 miniF2F test, surpassing both the baseline GPT-4 at 23.0% and a tree search reinforcement learning method at 41.0%. Moreover, the model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any. These results highlight the potential of leveraging to enhance theorem-proving capabilities in LLMs. In response to the ongoing challenges faced in automated theorem proving due to limited datasets for formal proof languages, a method has been proposed for generating extensive Lean 4 proof data from informal mathematical problems. This approach involves translating high-school and undergraduate-level competition problems into formal statements, automating proof generation using LLMs, and verifying correctness within the Lean 4 environment. To ensure both scale and quality of synthetic data generated through this method, a multi-step process has been implemented for quality assurance. Filtering out simple statements and invalid hypotheses is followed by an iterative framework that refines proof quality by generating synthetic statements from informal math problems using an under-trained LLM fine-tuned on limited data. Furthermore, addressing challenges related to the large search space for proofs, the method accelerates proof generation by proving negated statements in parallel and terminating processing once either the original statement or its negation is proven. The effectiveness of this approach was evaluated on Lean 4 theorem proving using benchmarks such as miniF2F and FIMO benchmarks. Results indicate that the iteratively trained model performs strongly with significant improvements in accuracy compared to existing methods. In summary, this research introduces an iterative method that synthesizes millions of formal statements accompanied by proofs from informal math problems, significantly enhancing scalability and quality of synthetic data. The model trained on this dataset achieves state-of-the-art performance on various benchmarks, showcasing its potential for advancing automated theorem proving capabilities in LLMs.

• - Proof assistants like Lean have revolutionized mathematical proof verification by ensuring accuracy and reliability.
• - Progress of large language models (LLMs) in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data.
• - A novel approach has been introduced to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems.
• - The DeepSeekMath 7B model was fine-tuned on a dataset comprising 8 million formal statements with proofs, leading to remarkable advancements.
• - The model demonstrated whole-proof generation accuracies surpassing both the baseline GPT-4 and a tree search reinforcement learning method.
• - Leveraging synthetic data generated through this method enhances theorem-proving capabilities in LLMs.

SummaryProof assistants like Lean help make sure math is correct and reliable. Big language models have trouble proving theorems because they don't have enough practice problems. A new way was found to create lots of proof examples using math competition questions. A model called DeepSeekMath 7B got better at proving things by practicing on 8 million examples. This model can write out whole proofs better than other methods. Definitions- Proof assistants: Tools that check if math work is right. - Theorem: A statement that can be proven true. - Data: Information used for learning or testing. - Model: Something used to represent or imitate real things. - Synthetic data: Made-up information used for practice or testing.

Introduction

Proof assistants, such as Lean, have revolutionized mathematical proof verification by ensuring accuracy and reliability. However, the progress of large language models (LLMs) in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this challenge, a novel approach has been introduced to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems.

The Challenge of Limited Training Data for LLMs

Large language models have shown promise in mathematical reasoning but are limited by the availability of training data for formal proof languages. This poses a significant challenge in advancing automated theorem proving capabilities using LLMs.

The Need for Extensive Proof Data

The success of LLMs in other domains has been attributed to their ability to learn from vast amounts of data. However, when it comes to formal theorem proving, there is a lack of extensive datasets that can be used to train these models effectively.

The Solution: Generating Synthetic Proof Data

To overcome this challenge, the research paper proposes an innovative method for generating synthetic proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This approach involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs using LLMs.

Methodology

The process for generating synthetic proof data involves several steps: 1. Translating Natural Language Problems into Formal Statements This step involves converting informal math problems into formal statements that can be processed by the model. The researchers used existing tools like MathWebSearch and DeepSeekMath 7B model to translate natural language text into LaTeX format. 2. Filtering Out Low-Quality Statements Not all translated statements are suitable for training the model due to their simplicity or invalid hypotheses. Therefore, a quality assurance process was implemented to filter out these low-quality statements. 3. Iterative Framework for Refining Proof Quality To further improve the quality of synthetic data, an iterative framework was implemented. This process involves using an under-trained LLM to generate new synthetic statements from informal math problems and then verifying their correctness within the Lean 4 environment. 4. Accelerating Proof Generation The large search space for proofs can be a significant challenge in automated theorem proving. To address this, the researchers introduced a method that accelerates proof generation by proving negated statements in parallel and terminating processing once either the original statement or its negation is proven.

Evaluation

The effectiveness of this approach was evaluated on Lean 4 theorem proving using benchmarks such as miniF2F and FIMO benchmarks. 1. Performance on MiniF2F Benchmark The model demonstrated whole-proof generation accuracies of 46.3% with 64 samples on the Lean 4 miniF2F test, surpassing both the baseline GPT-4 at 23.0% and a tree search reinforcement learning method at 41.0%. 2. Performance on FIMO Benchmark The model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any.

Conclusion

In summary, this research introduces an iterative method that synthesizes millions of formal statements accompanied by proofs from informal math problems, significantly enhancing scalability and quality of synthetic data. The model trained on this dataset achieves state-of-the-art performance on various benchmarks, showcasing its potential for advancing automated theorem proving capabilities in LLMs.