The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Techniques

AI-generated keywords: Generative Artificial Intelligence

AI-generated Key Points

  • Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly used in various industries and research settings
  • Developers and end users interact through prompting or prompt engineering
  • Lack of consensus on terminology and understanding of prompts due to the field's early stage
  • Paper aims to establish a taxonomy of prompting techniques and analyze their usage
  • Comprehensive vocabulary consisting of 33 terms, taxonomy with 58 text-only prompting techniques, and 40 techniques for other modalities
  • Meta-analysis of natural language prefix-prompting literature conducted
  • Various text-based techniques explored: In-Context Learning (ICL), Zero-Shot, Thought Generation, Decomposition, Ensembling
  • Prompt engineering and answer engineering strategies discussed for system performance optimization
  • Multilingual approaches like Chain-of-Thought (CoT), In-Context Example Selection, Prompt Template Language Selection, etc., included beyond English text prompting
  • Investigation into multimodal prompting techniques such as Image Prompting, Audio Prompting, Video Prompting for enhancing GenAI systems' capabilities
  • Extensions of prompting discussed including Tool Use Agents and Code-Generation Agents
  • Evaluation methods for prompts explored along with security considerations like prompt hacking risks and mitigation measures
  • Alignment challenges related to prompt sensitivity, biases, stereotypes addressed
  • Benchmarking methodologies for comparing different prompting techniques discussed
  • Case studies on prompt engineering processes provided
  • Future directions for research in GenAI systems' development through effective prompt utilization strategies highlighted.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sander Schulhoff, Michael Ilie, Nishant Balepur, Konstantine Kahadze, Amanda Liu, Chenglei Si, Yinheng Li, Aayush Gupta, HyoJung Han, Sevien Schulhoff, Pranav Sandeep Dulepet, Saurav Vidyadhara, Dayeon Ki, Sweta Agrawal, Chau Pham, Gerson Kroiz, Feileen Li, Hudson Tao, Ashay Srivastava, Hevander Da Costa, Saloni Gupta, Megan L. Rogers, Inna Goncearenco, Giuseppe Sarli, Igor Galynker, Denis Peskoff, Marine Carpuat, Jules White, Shyamal Anadkat, Alexander Hoyle, Philip Resnik

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems are being increasingly deployed across all parts of industry and research settings. Developers and end users interact with these systems through the use of prompting or prompt engineering. While prompting is a widespread and highly researched concept, there exists conflicting terminology and a poor ontological understanding of what constitutes a prompt due to the area's nascency. This paper establishes a structured understanding of prompts, by assembling a taxonomy of prompting techniques and analyzing their use. We present a comprehensive vocabulary of 33 vocabulary terms, a taxonomy of 58 text-only prompting techniques, and 40 techniques for other modalities. We further present a meta-analysis of the entire literature on natural language prefix-prompting.

Submitted to arXiv on 06 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.06608v1

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) systems are increasingly utilized in various industries and research settings, with developers and end users interacting through prompting or prompt engineering. While prompting is a well-researched concept, there is a lack of consensus on terminology and understanding of prompts due to the field's early stage. This paper aims to provide a structured understanding of prompts by establishing a taxonomy of prompting techniques and analyzing their usage. The study presents a comprehensive vocabulary consisting of 33 terms, a taxonomy encompassing 58 text-only prompting techniques, and an additional 40 techniques for other modalities. Furthermore, a meta-analysis of natural language prefix-prompting literature is conducted to enhance the understanding of prompt utilization. The analysis delves into various text-based techniques such as In-Context Learning (ICL), Zero-Shot, Thought Generation, Decomposition, and Ensembling. It also explores prompt engineering and answer engineering strategies to optimize system performance. Additionally, the study extends beyond English text prompting to include multilingual approaches like Chain-of-Thought (CoT), In-Context Example Selection, Prompt Template Language Selection, Prompting for Machine Translation, Segmentation Prompting, and 3D Prompting. Moreover, the research investigates multimodal prompting techniques including Image Prompting, Audio Prompting, Video Prompting, and their applications in enhancing GenAI systems' capabilities. The study also discusses extensions of prompting such as Agents like Tool Use Agents and Code-Generation Agents. Prompt evaluation methods are explored along with considerations for security issues like prompt hacking risks and mitigation measures. Alignment challenges related to prompt sensitivity, overconfidence calibration biases stereotypes culture ambiguity are also addressed. Benchmarking methodologies for comparing different prompting techniques are discussed alongside case studies on prompt engineering processes. The paper concludes by summarizing related work in the field and providing insights into future directions for research in GenAI systems' development through effective prompt utilization strategies.
Created on 14 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.