Commonsense-T2I Challenge: Can Text-to-Image Generation Models Understand Commonsense?

AI-generated keywords: Text-to-image synthesis Commonsense-T2I Adversarial challenge Multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) Generative modeling

AI-generated Key Points

  • Significant progress in text-to-image (T2I) synthesis field
  • Introduction of Commonsense-T2I task and benchmark for evaluating T2I models' ability to generate images aligned with common sense
  • Dataset curated by experts with fine-grained labels for analyzing model behavior
  • State-of-the-art T2I models like DALL·E 3 and stable diffusion XL struggled on the Commonsense-T2I task
  • GPT-enriched prompts did not significantly improve model performance on the challenge
  • Proposed evaluation metrics specific to Commonsense-T2I align with human perceptions
  • Interest in reasoning-related research questions about multimodality sparked by multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs)
  • Need for comprehensive studies on commonsense reasoning within T2I models
  • Ongoing advancements in generative modeling pushing boundaries of text-to-image synthesis, highlighting complexity in bridging language and visual information seamlessly
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xingyu Fu, Muyu He, Yujie Lu, William Yang Wang, Dan Roth

Text-to-Image Generation, Commonsense, Project Url: https://zeyofu.github.io/CommonsenseT2I/
License: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Abstract: We present a novel task and benchmark for evaluating the ability of text-to-image(T2I) generation models to produce images that fit commonsense in real life, which we call Commonsense-T2I. Given two adversarial text prompts containing an identical set of action words with minor differences, such as "a lightbulb without electricity" v.s. "a lightbulb with electricity", we evaluate whether T2I models can conduct visual-commonsense reasoning, e.g. produce images that fit "the lightbulb is unlit" vs. "the lightbulb is lit" correspondingly. Commonsense-T2I presents an adversarial challenge, providing pairwise text prompts along with expected outputs. The dataset is carefully hand-curated by experts and annotated with fine-grained labels, such as commonsense type and likelihood of the expected outputs, to assist analyzing model behavior. We benchmark a variety of state-of-the-art (sota) T2I models and surprisingly find that, there is still a large gap between image synthesis and real life photos--even the DALL-E 3 model could only achieve 48.92% on Commonsense-T2I, and the stable diffusion XL model only achieves 24.92% accuracy. Our experiments show that GPT-enriched prompts cannot solve this challenge, and we include a detailed analysis about possible reasons for such deficiency. We aim for Commonsense-T2I to serve as a high-quality evaluation benchmark for T2I commonsense checking, fostering advancements in real life image generation.

Submitted to arXiv on 11 Jun. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2406.07546v1

Significant progress has been made in the field of text-to-image (T2I) synthesis in recent years. Models such as DALL·E and diffusion models have demonstrated impressive results. However, there remains a gap between synthesized images and real-life photos. To address this challenge, a new task and benchmark called Commonsense-T2I have been introduced to evaluate T2I models' ability to generate images that align with common sense in real-world scenarios. This dataset presents an adversarial challenge by providing pairs of text prompts with minor differences in action words and evaluating whether T2I models can conduct visual-commonsense reasoning to produce corresponding images that fit the prompts. The dataset is meticulously curated by experts and annotated with fine-grained labels to assist in analyzing model behavior. Various state-of-the-art T2I models were benchmarked on Commonsense-T2I, revealing that even advanced models like DALL·E 3 and stable diffusion XL struggled to achieve high accuracy on the task. Surprisingly, GPT-enriched prompts did not significantly improve model performance on this challenge. Existing evaluation metrics for T2I models primarily focus on fidelity, image-text alignment, or use of large language models but lack comprehensive assessment of commonsense understanding in image generation tasks. The proposed evaluation metrics specific to Commonsense-T2I demonstrate alignment with human perceptions. The introduction of multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) has sparked interest in reasoning-related research questions about multimodality. However, there is still a need for comprehensive studies on commonsense reasoning within T2I models. In conclusion, Commonsense-T2I provides a valuable test set for evaluating the commonsense reasoning abilities of T2I models. While current models show moderate performance on the dataset, future research in this direction is encouraged. Limitations exist due to manual curation constraints; however, leveraging inspiration generation methods could facilitate the creation of larger weak-supervision datasets for further exploration in this area. Overall, ongoing advancements in generative modeling continue to push the boundaries of text-to-image synthesis but also highlight the complexity inherent in bridging language and visual information seamlessly.
Created on 17 Jun. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.