Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2312.05476v1

In this paper, the authors address the challenge of assessing the naturalness of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images (AGIs). They construct the AI-Generated Image Naturalness (AGIN) database through a large-scale subjective study, collecting human opinions on the overall naturalness as well as perceptions from technical and rationality perspectives. The AGIN database verifies that naturalness is universally and disparately affected by both types of distortions. To automatically learn the naturalness of AGIs that aligns with human ratings, the authors propose the Joint Objective Image Naturalness evaluaTor (JOINT). JOINT imitates human reasoning in naturalness evaluation by jointly learning both technical and rationality perspectives. Experimental results demonstrate that JOINT outperforms baselines in providing more subjectively consistent results on naturalness assessment. In an appendix section, additional details are provided for the construction of the AGIN database. The authors explain that they collected multi-sourced images from five tasks to cover diverse appearances of naturalness issues. For text-to-image models, they chose 20 keywords and created 10 prompts for each keyword using GPT3.5. The generated prompts were manually examined for compliance before collecting AI-generated images. Furthermore, the authors propose JOINT++ as an extension to JOINT, incorporating additional features such as texture losses, blurs, artifacts, semantic information, attribute theme, layout, and aesthetic assessment elements into their model. Overall, this paper contributes to understanding and evaluating the naturalness of AGIs by presenting a benchmark database and objective evaluators that align with human opinions. The work has implications for future research in this field and encourages new research on assessing AGI naturalness via analysis of technical and rationality features; it also promotes development of better algorithms for assessing naturalness in AI-generated multimedia.

• - Authors address the challenge of assessing the naturalness of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images (AGIs)
• - Constructed AI-Generated Image Naturalness (AGIN) database through a large-scale subjective study
• - AGIN database verifies that naturalness is affected by both types of distortions
• - Proposed Joint Objective Image Naturalness evaluaTor (JOINT) to learn naturalness aligning with human ratings
• - JOINT outperforms baselines in providing more subjectively consistent results on naturalness assessment
• - Appendix section provides additional details for construction of AGIN database
• - Collected multi-sourced images from five tasks to cover diverse appearances of naturalness issues
• - Chose 20 keywords and created 10 prompts for each keyword using GPT3.5 for text-to-image models
• - Generated prompts were manually examined for compliance before collecting AI-generated images
• - Proposed JOINT++ as an extension to JOINT, incorporating additional features into their model
• - Paper contributes to understanding and evaluating the naturalness of AGIs by presenting a benchmark database and objective evaluators aligned with human opinions

The authors of a paper wanted to figure out how to tell if pictures made by Artificial Intelligence (AI) look natural or not. They made a big database called AGIN to help with this. The database showed that both types of changes can affect how natural the pictures look. They also made a special tool called JOINT that can learn how to rate the naturalness of pictures like humans do. JOINT is better than other tools at giving consistent results. The paper also has more information in the appendix, and they used different kinds of pictures to make their database. They also made sure the AI-generated images followed certain rules before adding them to the database. They added more features to JOINT and called it JOINT++." Definitions- Artificial Intelligence (AI): Technology that allows computers or machines to mimic human intelligence and perform tasks like learning, problem-solving, and decision-making. - Naturalness: How much something looks or feels like it belongs in nature or is real. - Database: A collection of organized data stored on a computer system. - Objective: Based on facts and not influenced by personal feelings or opinions. - Evaluators: Tools or methods used to assess or judge something based on specific criteria.

Assessing the Naturalness of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Images: A Comprehensive Review

In recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly prevalent in many aspects of our lives. AI algorithms are now being used to generate images and videos that look realistic enough to be mistaken for real-world scenes. However, it is difficult to assess the naturalness of these AI-generated images (AGIs). In this paper, the authors address this challenge by constructing a benchmark database and proposing an objective evaluator for assessing AGI naturalness.

The AI-Generated Image Naturalness Database

The authors construct the AI-Generated Image Naturalness (AGIN) database through a large-scale subjective study, collecting human opinions on overall naturalness as well as perceptions from technical and rationality perspectives. The AGIN database verifies that naturalness is universally and disparately affected by both types of distortions. To create the dataset, multi-sourced images were collected from five tasks covering diverse appearances of naturalness issues. For text-to-image models, 20 keywords were chosen with 10 prompts created for each keyword using GPT3.5; these generated prompts were manually examined for compliance before collecting AI-generated images.

Joint Objective Image Naturalness EvaluaTor (JOINT)

To automatically learn the naturalness of AGIs that aligns with human ratings, the authors propose JOINT – an objective evaluator that imitates human reasoning in naturalness evaluation by jointly learning both technical and rationality perspectives. Experimental results demonstrate that JOINT outperforms baselines in providing more subjectively consistent results on naturalness assessment.

JOINT++ Extension

As an extension to JOINT, JOINT++ incorporates additional features such as texture losses, blurs, artifacts, semantic information, attribute theme layout and aesthetic assessment elements into their model. This further improves performance when evaluating image quality metrics such as sharpening or noise reduction levels compared to traditional methods like PSNR or SSIM alone which do not take into account perceptual factors like color accuracy or composition balance when determining image quality scores..

Conclusion

Overall, this paper contributes to understanding and evaluating the naturalness of AGIs by presenting a benchmark database and objective evaluators that align with human opinions. The work has implications for future research in this field and encourages new research on assessing AGI naturaless via analysis of technical and rationality features; it also promotes development of better algorithms for assessing naturaleness in AI generated multimedia content