AI summary · arXiv: 2406.07811v1 · cs.NE

Evolutionary Computation and Explainable AI: A Roadmap to Transparent Intelligent Systems

Ryan Zhou, Jaume Bacardit, Alexander Brownlee, Stefano Cagnoni, Martin Fyvie, Giovanni Iacca, John McCall, Niki van Stein,

and 2 more authorsDavid Walker, Ting Hu

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jun. 2024 29 pages, 4 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2306.14786 License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • AI methods are increasingly prevalent across various applications
  • Concerns exist about the black-box nature of AI models, hindering accountability and trust
  • Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) aims to provide human-understandable explanations for AI model outputs
  • Integration of evolutionary computation (EC) techniques within XAI can enhance transparency and interpretability in AI systems
  • The paper explores XAI principles, reviews current techniques for explaining ML models, and highlights approaches incorporating EC methodologies
  • Application of XAI principles within EC elucidates behavior and outcomes of EC algorithms, enhancing explainability and trustworthiness of ML models and EC algorithms
  • Open challenges in XAI are addressed alongside opportunities for future research leveraging EC methodologies

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Explainable AI Evolutionary Computation Transparency Trustworthiness

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), the use of AI methods has become increasingly prevalent across various applications. However, concerns have been raised regarding the inherent black-box nature of these AI models, which can hinder accountability and trust in their decision-making processes. In response to this challenge, the field of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has emerged, aiming to provide human-understandable explanations for AI model outputs. One promising avenue within XAI is the integration of evolutionary computation (EC) techniques. EC, as a versatile family of optimization and learning tools, holds significant potential to enhance transparency and interpretability in AI systems. This paper delves into an exploration of XAI principles and reviews current techniques used for explaining machine learning (ML) models. It then delves into how EC can be effectively leveraged within XAI frameworks, highlighting approaches that incorporate EC methodologies. Furthermore, the paper discusses the application of XAI principles within EC itself, shedding light on how these principles can elucidate the behavior and outcomes of EC algorithms. By examining automatic configuration processes and underlying problem landscapes optimized by these algorithms, insights are gained into enhancing the explainability and trustworthiness of both ML models and EC algorithms. As the discussion unfolds, open challenges in XAI are addressed alongside opportunities for future research leveraging EC methodologies. The authors aim to showcase that EC is well-suited to tackle existing issues surrounding explainability in AI systems while encouraging further exploration to foster the development of more transparent and trustworthy ML models and EC algorithms. Through this roadmap towards transparent intelligent systems, a pathway is paved for advancing XAI with robust foundations rooted in evolutionary computation principles.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.