In their paper titled "Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers," Katie Everett, Lechao Xiao, Mitchell Wortsman, Alexander A. Alemi, Roman Novak, Peter J. Liu, Izzeddin Gur, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Jaehoon Lee, and Jeffrey Pennington explore the robust and effective scaling of models from small to large width by adjusting algorithmic and architectural details such as parameterization and optimizer choices. They propose a new perspective on parameterization by challenging key assumptions in prior work regarding the alignment between parameters and data. Through empirical investigations involving tens of thousands of models trained with various optimizers, parameterizations, alignment assumptions, learning rates, and model sizes up to 26.8B parameters,the authors derive new theoretical results under weaker assumptions. Their findings reveal that the best learning rate scaling prescription may have been overlooked in previous studies due to restrictive assumptions. Contrary to existing beliefs that only maximal update parameterization (muP) can achieve hyperparameter transfer,the authors demonstrate that all parameterizations can achieve this feat. Additionally, they introduce a novel per-layer learning rate prescription for standard parameterization that outperforms muP.Furthermore,the researchers highlight the importance of correctly scaling the epsilon parameter in Adam optimizer to prevent gradient underflow.They propose Adam-atan2 as a new numerically stable version of Adam that eliminates the epsilon hyperparameter entirely. The study's comprehensive analysis sheds light on the intricate relationship between parameterization choices and optimizer performance across various model sizes.By challenging conventional wisdom and introducing innovative approaches to hyperparameter tuningand optimization techniques,this research contributes valuable insights to the field of machine learning scalability.
- - The paper explores scaling models from small to large width by adjusting algorithmic and architectural details such as parameterization and optimizer choices.
- - The authors challenge key assumptions in prior work regarding the alignment between parameters and data, proposing a new perspective on parameterization.
- - Through empirical investigations involving tens of thousands of models trained with various optimizers, parameterizations, alignment assumptions, learning rates, and model sizes up to 26.8B parameters, the authors derive new theoretical results under weaker assumptions.
- - Findings reveal that the best learning rate scaling prescription may have been overlooked in previous studies due to restrictive assumptions.
- - All parameterizations can achieve hyperparameter transfer contrary to existing beliefs that only maximal update parameterization (muP) can achieve this feat.
- - Introduction of a novel per-layer learning rate prescription for standard parameterization that outperforms muP is highlighted.
- - Importance of correctly scaling the epsilon parameter in Adam optimizer to prevent gradient underflow is emphasized.
- - Proposal of Adam-atan2 as a new numerically stable version of Adam that eliminates the epsilon hyperparameter entirely is made.
- - The study's comprehensive analysis sheds light on the intricate relationship between parameterization choices and optimizer performance across various model sizes, contributing valuable insights to machine learning scalability.
Summary- The paper looks at making models bigger or smaller by changing how they work, like adjusting settings and choices.
- The authors question old ideas about how well the settings match the data and suggest a new way to set them up.
- By testing many models with different settings, the authors find new results without needing strict rules.
- They discover that previous studies may have missed the best way to adjust learning rates because of limited thinking.
- Any setting can be good at transferring knowledge between tasks, not just one type as believed before.
Definitions- Scaling: Changing the size or proportions of something
- Algorithmic: Relating to a process or set of rules used in calculations or problem-solving
- Architectural: Related to the design and structure of something
- Parameterization: Setting values for specific variables in a model
- Optimizer: A tool that helps improve how well a system works by adjusting its settings.
Introduction
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in scaling up machine learning models to achieve better performance on complex tasks. However, the process of scaling models from small to large widths is not a straightforward one and requires careful consideration of various algorithmic and architectural details. In their paper titled "Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers," a team of researchers explore the robust and effective scaling of models by adjusting parameterization and optimizer choices. Their findings challenge conventional wisdom and introduce innovative approaches to hyperparameter tuning and optimization techniques.
Background
The authors begin by providing an overview of prior work on model scaling, which has largely focused on maximizing the number of parameters or increasing model width as the primary means for improving performance. However, this approach often leads to diminishing returns or even decreased performance due to issues such as overfitting or gradient underflow. The authors propose that instead of solely focusing on increasing model size, other factors such as parameterization and optimizer choices should also be considered for optimal scalability.
Parameterization Choices
One key aspect explored in this study is the relationship between parameterization choices and model performance. Previous research has assumed that maximal update parameterization (muP) is necessary for achieving hyperparameter transfer – where a well-tuned set of hyperparameters can be transferred across different model sizes without significant loss in performance. However, through extensive empirical investigations involving tens of thousands of models trained with various optimizers, alignment assumptions, learning rates, and model sizes up to 26.8B parameters,the authors demonstrate that all parameterizations can achieve hyperparameter transfer.
This finding challenges previous beliefs about muP being the only viable option for achieving hyperparameter transferand highlights the importance of considering different parameterization choices when scaling models.
Per-Layer Learning Rate Prescription
Another important aspect highlighted in this paper is the impact of learning rate prescription on model scalability. The authors introduce a novel per-layer learning rate prescription for standard parameterization that outperforms muP. This approach involves setting different learning rates for each layer of the model, instead of using a single global learning rate for all layers. The authors demonstrate through experiments that this per-layer learning rate prescription can significantly improve model performance and scalability.
Adam-atan2 Optimizer
The study also delves into the impact of optimizer choices on model scalability. The popular Adam optimizer is known to perform well on various tasks but has been shown to suffer from gradient underflow issues when used with large models. To address this problem, the authors propose a new version of Adam called Adam-atan2, which eliminates the epsilon hyperparameter entirely and uses an alternative formulation for calculating gradients.
Their experiments show that Adam-atan2 not only prevents gradient underflow but also outperforms traditional Adam in terms of both convergence speed and final performance. This highlights the importance of correctly scaling the epsilon parameter in optimizers when dealing with large models.
Conclusion
Through their comprehensive analysis involving various algorithmic and architectural details, the researchers provide valuable insights into achieving optimal scalability in machine learning models. Their findings challenge conventional wisdom and introduce innovative approaches to hyperparameter tuning and optimization techniques. By considering factors such as parameterization choices, per-layer learning rates, and optimized versions of popular algorithms like Adam, researchers can achieve better performance when scaling up their models.
In conclusion, "Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers" sheds light on the intricate relationship between parameterization choices and optimizer performance across various model sizes. This research contributes valuable insights to the field of machine learning scalability by challenging existing beliefs and introducing novel approaches to achieving optimal performance in scaled-up models.