Inner Monologue: Embodied Reasoning through Planning with Language Models

AI-generated keywords: LLMs Natural Language Feedback Embodied Contexts Robotic Control Scenarios Reasoning Capabilities

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) have potential in domains beyond natural language processing
  • LLMs used in embodied environments face additional challenges
  • The study investigates the extent to which LLMs can reason over different sources of feedback provided through natural language without additional training
  • Feedback from the environment helps LLMs develop an inner monologue that enhances their ability to process information and plan actions in robotic control scenarios
  • Various forms of feedback, including success detection, scene description, and human interaction, are explored
  • Incorporating closed-loop language feedback significantly improves high-level instruction completion across three domains: simulated and real table-top rearrangement tasks and long-horizon mobile manipulation tasks in a kitchen environment
  • Improvement is observed both in simulations and real-world experiments
  • Natural language feedback enhances reasoning capabilities in embodied contexts
  • Enabling LLMs to form an inner monologue through environment feedback improves task completion based on high-level instructions across different domains
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Wenlong Huang, Fei Xia, Ted Xiao, Harris Chan, Jacky Liang, Pete Florence, Andy Zeng, Jonathan Tompson, Igor Mordatch, Yevgen Chebotar, Pierre Sermanet, Noah Brown, Tomas Jackson, Linda Luu, Sergey Levine, Karol Hausman, Brian Ichter

Project website: https://innermonologue.github.io

Abstract: Recent works have shown how the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) can be applied to domains beyond natural language processing, such as planning and interaction for robots. These embodied problems require an agent to understand many semantic aspects of the world: the repertoire of skills available, how these skills influence the world, and how changes to the world map back to the language. LLMs planning in embodied environments need to consider not just what skills to do, but also how and when to do them - answers that change over time in response to the agent's own choices. In this work, we investigate to what extent LLMs used in such embodied contexts can reason over sources of feedback provided through natural language, without any additional training. We propose that by leveraging environment feedback, LLMs are able to form an inner monologue that allows them to more richly process and plan in robotic control scenarios. We investigate a variety of sources of feedback, such as success detection, scene description, and human interaction. We find that closed-loop language feedback significantly improves high-level instruction completion on three domains, including simulated and real table top rearrangement tasks and long-horizon mobile manipulation tasks in a kitchen environment in the real world.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jul. 2022

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2207.05608v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Recent works have demonstrated the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs) in domains beyond natural language processing, such as planning and interaction for robots. These tasks require the agent to understand various semantic aspects of the world, including available skills, their impact on the environment, and how changes in the world are represented in language. However, LLMs used in embodied environments face additional challenges. They not only need to determine what skills to employ but also how and when to execute them, with answers that may change over time based on the agent's choices. In this study, the authors investigate the extent to which LLMs can reason over different sources of feedback provided through natural language without any additional training. They propose that by leveraging feedback from the environment, LLMs can develop an inner monologue that enhances their ability to process information and plan actions in robotic control scenarios. The researchers explore various forms of feedback, including success detection, scene description, and human interaction. The findings reveal that incorporating closed-loop language feedback significantly improves high-level instruction completion across three domains: simulated and real table-top rearrangement tasks and long-horizon mobile manipulation tasks in a kitchen environment. This improvement is observed both in simulations and real-world experiments. Overall, this research highlights the potential of using natural language feedback to enhance reasoning capabilities in embodied contexts. By enabling LLMs to form an inner monologue through environment feedback, they become more proficient at processing information and planning actions in robotic control scenarios. These findings contribute to advancing the field of robotics by improving task completion based on high-level instructions across different domains.
Created on 22 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.