Mindful-RAG: A Study of Points of Failure in Retrieval Augmented Generation

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Retrieval-augmented generation Knowledge graphs Error patterns Mindful-RAG

AI-generated Key Points

  • Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems enhance knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks by incorporating external knowledge sources like structured knowledge graphs (KGs).
  • Existing KG-based RAG methods often struggle to produce accurate answers due to errors stemming from a lack of focus on discerning the question's intent and gathering relevant context from knowledge graph facts.
  • The Mindful-RAG approach is introduced as a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval, targeting identified failures and improving correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs.
  • The model adeptly contextualizes information by identifying key entities and relevant tokens within questions, enabling effective extraction of pertinent information from external KGs or sub-graphs within KGs.
  • Research aims to enhance reasoning capabilities in KG-based RAG methods integrated with LLMs for QA tasks by addressing reasoning failures related to comprehension of questions, utilization of contextual clues, challenges with temporal context, and complex relational reasoning.
  • Exploring feedback loops for real-time user corrections integration and combining vector-based search methods with KG-based sub-graph retrieval could further enhance accuracy and practical utility.
  • The work focuses on refining intent identification and context alignment to elevate the performance of LLMs in knowledge-intensive QA tasks across diverse domains through steps such as identifying key entities and relevant tokens within questions using the Mindful-RAG framework.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Garima Agrawal, Tharindu Kumarage, Zeyad Alghamdi, Huan Liu

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are proficient at generating coherent and contextually relevant text but face challenges when addressing knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems mitigate this by incorporating external knowledge sources, such as structured knowledge graphs (KGs). However, LLMs often struggle to produce accurate answers despite access to KG-extracted information containing necessary facts. Our study investigates this dilemma by analyzing error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifying eight critical failure points. We observed that these errors predominantly occur due to insufficient focus on discerning the question's intent and adequately gathering relevant context from the knowledge graph facts. Drawing on this analysis, we propose the Mindful-RAG approach, a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval. This method explicitly targets the identified failures and offers improvements in the correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs, representing a significant step forward from existing methods.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.12216v1

In the realm of Large Language Models (LLMs), Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have emerged as a solution to enhance knowledge-intensive queries in domain-specific and factual question-answering tasks by incorporating external knowledge sources like structured knowledge graphs (KGs). However, despite access to KG-extracted information containing necessary facts, LLMs often struggle to produce accurate answers. In response to this dilemma, our study delves into error patterns in existing KG-based RAG methods and identifies eight critical failure points. These errors primarily stem from a lack of focus on discerning the question's intent and gathering relevant context from the knowledge graph facts. Drawing on this analysis, we introduce the Mindful-RAG approach, a framework designed for intent-based and contextually aligned knowledge retrieval. This method targets the identified failures and offers improvements in the correctness and relevance of responses provided by LLMs. The model adeptly contextualizes information by identifying key entities and relevant tokens within questions, enabling it to extract pertinent information from external KGs or sub-graphs within KGs effectively. Furthermore, our research aims to significantly enhance reasoning capabilities in KG-based RAG methods integrated with LLMs for QA tasks. By addressing reasoning failures related to comprehension of questions and utilization of contextual clues, as well as challenges with temporal context and complex relational reasoning, we strive to improve state-of-the-art approaches. Additionally, exploring feedback loops for real-time user corrections integration and combining vector-based search methods with KG-based sub-graph retrieval could further enhance accuracy and practical utility. In conclusion, our work focuses on refining intent identification and context alignment in order to elevate the performance of LLMs in knowledge-intensive QA tasks across diverse domains. By implementing steps such as identifying key entities and relevant tokens within questions, our Mindful-RAG framework aims to refine responses further while ensuring contextually coherent answers that address the deficiencies identified through detailed error analysis.
Created on 08 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.