Implementing engrams from a machine learning perspective: the relevance of a latent space

AI-generated keywords: Engrams Machine Learning Autoencoders Latent Space Cognitive Processes

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Engrams are neural representations of memories
  • Engrams can be implemented biologically as autoencoders over recurrent neural networks
  • Autoencoders consist of basic excitatory/inhibitory motifs and utilize credit assignment based on a simple homeostatic criterion
  • Importance of the latent space within autoencoders is investigated
  • Differences in connectome structures across species may be linked to cognitive capacities
  • Human cognition may be constrained by brain structure, limiting cognitive abilities
  • Machine learning systems offer an augmented perspective on understanding and processing information
  • Need to explore and leverage enhanced capability for advancing understanding of cognitive processes
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: J Marco de Lucas

6 pages, 2 figures
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: In our previous work, we proposed that engrams in the brain could be biologically implemented as autoencoders over recurrent neural networks. These autoencoders would comprise basic excitatory/inhibitory motifs, with credit assignment deriving from a simple homeostatic criterion. This brief note examines the relevance of the latent space in these autoencoders. We consider the relationship between the dimensionality of these autoencoders and the complexity of the information being encoded. We discuss how observed differences between species in their connectome could be linked to their cognitive capacities. Finally, we link this analysis with a basic but often overlooked fact: human cognition is likely limited by our own brain structure. However, this limitation does not apply to machine learning systems, and we should be aware of the need to learn how to exploit this augmented vision of the nature.

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Jul. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2407.16616v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study "Implementing engrams from a machine learning perspective: the relevance of a latent space" by J Marco de Lucas, the concept of engrams in the brain is explored through the lens of machine learning. The researchers propose that engrams, which are neural representations of memories, can be implemented biologically as autoencoders over recurrent neural networks. These autoencoders consist of basic excitatory/inhibitory motifs and utilize credit assignment based on a simple homeostatic criterion. The focus of this study is on investigating the importance of the latent space within these autoencoders. By analyzing differences in connectome structures across species, they suggest a potential link between these variances and cognitive capacities. A key insight highlighted in this research is that human cognition may be constrained by our brain's structure, limiting our cognitive abilities. In contrast, machine learning systems do not face this limitation, offering an augmented perspective on understanding and processing information. The study emphasizes the need to explore and leverage this enhanced capability for advancing our understanding of cognitive processes. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how engrams can be understood and implemented from a machine learning standpoint, shedding light on the potential implications for cognitive research and artificial intelligence development.
Created on 06 Apr. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.