The use of large language models (LLMs) has greatly improved their applications in natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation (MT), text summarization, and information retrieval. These advancements are attributed to the enhanced natural language understanding capabilities and contextual awareness of LLMs. Traditional approaches for evaluating MT quality rely on metrics like BLEU or fine-tuning multilingual pre-trained language models (PTLMs) on human evaluation data. However, recent studies have explored prompting techniques to instruct LLMs for translation quality evaluation. This study investigates the ability of LLMs in evaluating MT quality without training across eight different languages and suggests that reference translations play a crucial role in accurate evaluations. Additionally, larger LLM variants tend to benefit more from Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting than smaller ones. Surprisingly, a 7-billion parameter model outperformed other models for most languages, indicating that model size does not always correlate with performance. Furthermore, COMET models fine-tuned on multilingual data generally outperformed LLM prompting results. Overall, this study highlights the importance of reference translations and provides valuable insights into factors influencing LLM-based MT evaluation. The release of prompt templates, code, and data aims to facilitate reproducibility and further research in this area. The recent surge in the use of large language models (LLMs) has significantly improved their applications in various downstream tasks such as natural language processing (NLP), including machine translation (MT), text summarization, and information retrieval. These advancements are attributed to the enhanced natural language understanding capabilities and contextual awareness of LLMs, as well as their versatile knowledge base. Traditional approaches for evaluating MT quality rely on metrics like BLEU, BLEURT, or BERTScore to compare the MT output with a reference translation. In the absence of reference translations, quality estimation methods such as fine-tuning multilingual pre-trained language models (PTLMs) on human evaluation data are often used. However, recent studies have explored prompting techniques to instruct LLMs in outputting scores for translation quality evaluation. This study investigates the ability of LLMs to evaluate MT quality without training across eight different languages covering high-, medium-, and low-resource languages. The findings suggest that reference translations play a crucial role in achieving accurate evaluations using LLMs. While larger models do not always outperform smaller ones, they tend to benefit more from Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting than smaller model variants. Surprisingly, a 7-billion parameter model surpassed other models for most language pairs, indicating that model size does not always correlate with performance. Additionally, COMET models fine-tuned on multilingual data generally outperformed LLM prompting results. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing LLM-based MT evaluation and highlights the importance of reference translations in achieving accurate evaluations. The release of prompt templates, code, and data aims to facilitate reproducibility and further research in this area. Future directions may involve exploring additional prompting techniques and investigating the performance of larger LLM variants with higher computational costs.
- - Large language models (LLMs) have improved applications in natural language processing tasks like machine translation, text summarization, and information retrieval.
- - Enhanced natural language understanding capabilities and contextual awareness contribute to the advancements of LLMs.
- - Traditional approaches for evaluating machine translation quality include metrics like BLEU and fine-tuning multilingual pre-trained language models (PTLMs) on human evaluation data.
- - Recent studies have explored prompting techniques to instruct LLMs for translation quality evaluation without training.
- - Reference translations are crucial for accurate evaluations using LLMs across different languages.
- - Larger LLM variants tend to benefit more from Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting than smaller ones, but model size doesn't always correlate with performance.
- - A 7-billion parameter model outperformed other models for most languages, indicating that larger size doesn't always mean better performance.
- - COMET models fine-tuned on multilingual data generally outperformed LLM prompting results in MT quality evaluation.
- - The study emphasizes the importance of reference translations and provides insights into factors influencing LLM-based MT evaluation.
SummaryLarge language models (LLMs) are big computer programs that help us understand and use languages better. They are good at tasks like translating languages, summarizing text, and finding information. LLMs learn more about language and context to become even smarter. People use different ways to check how well these models work, like using special metrics or teaching them with new instructions. Having correct reference translations is very important for checking how well LLMs work in different languages.
Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Big computer programs that help with understanding and using languages.
- Machine translation: The process of translating text from one language to another using computers.
- Contextual awareness: Understanding the meaning of words based on the surrounding text or situation.
- Metrics: Measurements used to evaluate the performance or quality of something.
- Reference translations: Correct translations used as a standard for comparison or evaluation.
The Use of Large Language Models in Natural Language Processing Tasks
The recent surge in the use of large language models (LLMs) has greatly improved their applications in natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation (MT), text summarization, and information retrieval. These advancements are attributed to the enhanced natural language understanding capabilities and contextual awareness of LLMs, as well as their versatile knowledge base.
Traditional approaches for evaluating MT quality rely on metrics like BLEU or fine-tuning multilingual pre-trained language models (PTLMs) on human evaluation data. However, recent studies have explored prompting techniques to instruct LLMs for translation quality evaluation. This study investigates the ability of LLMs in evaluating MT quality without training across eight different languages covering high-, medium-, and low-resource languages.
Reference Translations Play a Crucial Role
One key finding from this study is that reference translations play a crucial role in achieving accurate evaluations using LLMs. In the absence of reference translations, quality estimation methods such as fine-tuning PTLMs on human evaluation data are often used. However, these methods require significant time and resources to collect and annotate reference translations for each language pair.
Prompting techniques offer an alternative approach by providing instructions or cues to guide LLMs towards outputting scores for translation quality evaluation without relying on reference translations. The results from this study suggest that while larger models do not always outperform smaller ones, they tend to benefit more from Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting than smaller model variants.
A Surprising Result: Model Size Does Not Always Correlate with Performance
Another surprising result from this study is that a 7-billion parameter model surpassed other models for most language pairs, indicating that model size does not always correlate with performance. This suggests that factors other than just model size may influence the effectiveness of LLMs in evaluating MT quality.
Additionally, COMET models fine-tuned on multilingual data generally outperformed LLM prompting results. This highlights the importance of considering different approaches and techniques for evaluating MT quality using LLMs.
Implications and Future Directions
Overall, this study provides valuable insights into the factors influencing LLM-based MT evaluation and highlights the importance of reference translations in achieving accurate evaluations. The release of prompt templates, code, and data aims to facilitate reproducibility and further research in this area.
Future directions may involve exploring additional prompting techniques and investigating the performance of larger LLM variants with higher computational costs. As technology continues to advance, it is important to continue exploring ways to improve the accuracy and efficiency of LLM-based MT evaluation for a wide range of languages.