Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents

AI-generated keywords: Agent-as-a-Judge framework DevAI dataset code generation agentic frameworks automated AI development tasks human evaluations

AI-generated Key Points

  • Researchers introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework to address inadequacy of current evaluation techniques for agentic systems
  • The DevAI dataset is released, containing 55 AI development tasks with detailed requirements and preferences
  • Benchmarking of top open-source code generation agentic frameworks using the DevAI dataset shows superiority of Agent-as-a-Judge framework over LLM-as-a-Judge method
  • Agent-as-a-Judge framework performs comparably to human evaluators in proof-of-concept test by providing rich and reliable reward signals for self-improvement
  • Motivation behind creating DevAI benchmark is to provide realistic benchmarks for automated AI development tasks that reflect entire process and offer sufficient reward signals
  • Human evaluations show promising results of Agent-as-a-Judge framework in evaluating agentic systems' performance, reducing manual oversight and training times
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Mingchen Zhuge, Changsheng Zhao, Dylan Ashley, Wenyi Wang, Dmitrii Khizbullin, Yunyang Xiong, Zechun Liu, Ernie Chang, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi, Yuandong Tian, Yangyang Shi, Vikas Chandra, Jürgen Schmidhuber

The project can be found at https://devai.tech. The dataset is released at https://huggingface.co/DEVAI-benchmark
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Contemporary evaluation techniques are inadequate for agentic systems. These approaches either focus exclusively on final outcomes -- ignoring the step-by-step nature of agentic systems, or require excessive manual labour. To address this, we introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems. This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process. We apply the Agent-as-a-Judge to the task of code generation. To overcome issues with existing benchmarks and provide a proof-of-concept testbed for Agent-as-a-Judge, we present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks. It includes rich manual annotations, like a total of 365 hierarchical user requirements. We benchmark three of the popular agentic systems using Agent-as-a-Judge and find it dramatically outperforms LLM-as-a-Judge and is as reliable as our human evaluation baseline. Altogether, we believe that Agent-as-a-Judge marks a concrete step forward for modern agentic systems -- by providing rich and reliable reward signals necessary for dynamic and scalable self-improvement.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.10934v1

In this study, the researchers address the inadequacy of contemporary evaluation techniques for agentic systems by introducing the Agent-as-a-Judge framework. This innovative approach allows agentic systems to evaluate other agentic systems, providing a more comprehensive and dynamic evaluation process compared to traditional methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach, the researchers release the DevAI dataset which consists of 55 AI development tasks with detailed hierarchical requirements and preferences. By benchmarking three top open-source code generation agentic frameworks using the DevAI dataset, they offer a more thorough analysis than previous evaluations. The results show that the Agent-as-a-Judge framework outperforms the LLM-as-a-Judge method and performs comparably to human evaluators in a proof-of-concept test. This is achieved by incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback throughout task-solving processes, providing rich and reliable reward signals necessary for self-improvement in modern agentic systems. The motivation behind creating the DevAI benchmark stems from a lack of realistic benchmarks for automated AI development tasks. Existing benchmarks often focus on final outcomes rather than reflecting the entire development process or providing sufficient reward signals for long-horizon tasks. The researchers emphasize practical software scenarios where tasks are complex and require human or agentic assistance. Through human evaluations conducted on baseline executions, it is evident that the Agent-as-a-Judge framework offers promising results in evaluating agentic systems' performance. The comparison with human evaluators highlights the potential of this new approach in providing valuable insights into AI development tasks while reducing manual oversight and training times. Overall, this study marks a significant advancement in evaluating modern agentic systems effectively and efficiently through innovative frameworks like Agent-as-a-Judge.
Created on 25 Mar. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.