, , , ,
The emergence of LLM-based agents has revolutionized the field of AI, enabling autonomous systems to plan, reason, use tools, and maintain memory while interacting with dynamic environments. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of evaluation methodologies for these advanced agents, focusing on four critical dimensions: fundamental agent capabilities, application-specific benchmarks for web, software engineering, scientific, and conversational agents, benchmarks for generalist agents, and frameworks for evaluating agents. For episodic memory evaluation, (Huet et al., 2025) introduces a specialized benchmark to assess how LLMs generate and manage memories capturing specific events with contextual details. StreamBench (Wu et al., 2024a) evaluates how agents leverage external memory components to continuously improve performance over time across diverse datasets. Memory mechanisms also enhance real-time decision-making and learning in agent settings. Reflexion (Shinn et al., 2023), RAISE (Liu et al., 2024a), and KARMA (Wang et al., 2024b) demonstrate how memory systems significantly improve agent performance in tasks requiring complex reasoning and information retention. The landscape of application-specific agents is expanding rapidly across categories such as tools, web, software, game, embodied, and scientific agents. Agent benchmarks offer a systematic framework for assessing the diverse capabilities of LLM-based agents by integrating clearly defined tasks with evaluation strategies tailored to their unique applications. Furthermore, the paper discusses benchmarks and leaderboards for evaluating general-purpose agents that assess the agent's ability to perform tasks efficiently with operational viability. The analysis reveals emerging trends towards more realistic evaluations with continuously updated benchmarks but also highlights critical gaps in assessing cost-efficiency, safety, robustness, and developing scalable evaluation methods. In conclusion, this survey maps the evolving landscape of agent evaluation methodologies while identifying current limitations and proposing directions for future research to address these challenges effectively.
- - LLM-based agents have revolutionized AI by enabling autonomous systems to plan, reason, use tools, and maintain memory in dynamic environments.
- - Evaluation methodologies for advanced agents focus on four critical dimensions: fundamental agent capabilities, application-specific benchmarks, benchmarks for generalist agents, and frameworks for evaluating agents.
- - Specialized benchmarks like those introduced by Huet et al. (2025) and Wu et al. (2024a) assess episodic memory generation and management in LLMs.
- - Memory mechanisms improve real-time decision-making and learning in agent settings, as demonstrated by Reflexion (Shinn et al., 2023), RAISE (Liu et al., 2024a), and KARMA (Wang et al., 2024b).
- - Agent benchmarks provide a systematic framework for assessing the diverse capabilities of LLM-based agents across various applications.
- - The analysis highlights trends towards more realistic evaluations with continuously updated benchmarks but also identifies gaps in assessing cost-efficiency, safety, robustness, and scalability of evaluation methods.
SummaryLLM-based agents have changed AI by helping robots think, plan, use tools, and remember things in different places. There are ways to test how good these agents are at their jobs, like seeing what they can do, comparing them to others, and using special tests for memory. Memory helps robots make quick decisions and learn better in different situations. Some projects have shown how memory can help robots work smarter. Tests help us see how well robots with good memories can do different tasks.
Definitions- LLM-based agents: Robots that use a special kind of technology to think and remember things.
- Autonomous systems: Machines that can work on their own without people telling them what to do.
- Episodic memory: Remembering specific events or experiences.
- Real-time decision-making: Making choices quickly as things happen.
- Benchmarks: Standards or tests used to measure how well something works or performs.
Introduction
The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen significant advancements in recent years, with the emergence of LLM-based agents being one of the most notable developments. These advanced agents have the ability to plan, reason, use tools, and maintain memory while interacting with dynamic environments autonomously. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of evaluation methodologies for LLM-based agents, focusing on four critical dimensions: fundamental agent capabilities, application-specific benchmarks, generalist agent benchmarks, and frameworks for evaluating agents.
Fundamental Agent Capabilities
The first dimension discussed in this paper is fundamental agent capabilities. This includes the basic abilities that an agent must possess to perform tasks effectively. Some examples include perception, reasoning, planning, and learning. Evaluating these capabilities is crucial as they form the foundation upon which more complex tasks can be built.
One area where fundamental agent capabilities are evaluated is episodic memory evaluation. Huet et al., 2025 introduces a specialized benchmark to assess how LLMs generate and manage memories capturing specific events with contextual details. This benchmark evaluates an agent's ability to store and retrieve information accurately from its memory system.
Another aspect of fundamental capability evaluation is assessing how agents leverage external memory components to continuously improve performance over time across diverse datasets. StreamBench (Wu et al., 2024a) is a benchmark specifically designed for this purpose.
Memory mechanisms also play a crucial role in real-time decision-making and learning in agent settings. Reflexion (Shinn et al., 2023), RAISE (Liu et al., 2024a), and KARMA (Wang et al., 2024b) demonstrate how memory systems significantly improve agent performance in tasks requiring complex reasoning and information retention.
Application-Specific Benchmarks
The second dimension discussed in this paper is application-specific benchmarks for LLM-based agents. As the use of these agents expands into various domains, it is essential to have benchmarks that evaluate their performance in specific applications. This includes web, software engineering, scientific, and conversational agents.
Web agents are designed to interact with users on the internet and perform tasks such as information retrieval or recommendation systems. Software engineering agents assist developers in tasks like debugging or code completion. Scientific agents help researchers analyze data and make predictions based on complex models. Conversational agents engage in natural language conversations with humans.
Benchmarks for application-specific agents offer a systematic framework for evaluating their diverse capabilities by integrating clearly defined tasks with evaluation strategies tailored to their unique applications.
Generalist Agent Benchmarks
The third dimension discussed in this paper is generalist agent benchmarks. These benchmarks assess an agent's ability to perform a wide range of tasks efficiently and effectively, making them suitable for real-world applications.
One example of a generalist benchmark is GLUE (Wang et al., 2018), which evaluates an agent's performance across multiple natural language processing (NLP) tasks such as sentiment analysis and question-answering. Another benchmark called SuperGLUE (Wang et al., 2019) builds upon GLUE by including more challenging NLP tasks that require advanced reasoning abilities.
Evaluation Frameworks
The final dimension discussed in this paper is frameworks for evaluating LLM-based agents. These frameworks provide a structured approach to assessing an agent's overall performance while also identifying areas for improvement.
One example of an evaluation framework is the OpenAI Gym (Brockman et al., 2016), which provides a standardized environment for testing reinforcement learning algorithms across various domains such as robotics and games.
Another framework called ALE (Bellemare et al., 2012) focuses specifically on evaluating game-playing AI by providing access to over fifty Atari games as testing environments.
Current Trends and Future Directions
The analysis presented in this paper reveals several emerging trends in the evaluation of LLM-based agents. These include a shift towards more realistic evaluations with continuously updated benchmarks, as well as an emphasis on evaluating cost-efficiency, safety, and robustness.
However, there are also critical gaps in current evaluation methodologies that need to be addressed. These include developing scalable evaluation methods for large-scale systems and incorporating ethical considerations into the evaluation process.
In conclusion, this survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of agent evaluation methodologies while also identifying areas for improvement. As AI continues to advance and become more integrated into our daily lives, it is crucial to have robust and reliable methods for evaluating these advanced agents. This paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in the field of AI by highlighting key areas for future research and development.