RAG-DDR: Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Using Differentiable Data Rewards

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models (LLMs)

AI-generated Key Points

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with accurate responses due to hallucinations
  • Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances LLMs by retrieving knowledge from external sources
  • Instruction tuning optimizes LLMs to effectively utilize retrieved knowledge for diverse tasks
  • Differentiable Data Rewards (DDR) aligns data preferences between different modules in RAG systems
  • DDR outperforms supervised fine-tuning (SFT), especially for smaller-scale LLMs heavily relying on retrieved knowledge
  • DDR improves the generation module's effectiveness in extracting key information and mitigating conflicts between parametric memory and external knowledge
  • DDR focuses on aligning data preferences across different agents within a multi-agent system, avoiding overfitting training signals and enhancing RAG optimization compared to traditional methods like SFT
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Xinze Li, Sen Mei, Zhenghao Liu, Yukun Yan, Shuo Wang, Shi Yu, Zheni Zeng, Hao Chen, Ge Yu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Chenyan Xiong

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven its effectiveness in mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving knowledge from external resources. To adapt LLMs for RAG pipelines, current approaches use instruction tuning to optimize LLMs, improving their ability to utilize retrieved knowledge. This supervised fine-tuning (SFT) approach focuses on equipping LLMs to handle diverse RAG tasks using different instructions. However, it trains RAG modules to overfit training signals and overlooks the varying data preferences among agents within the RAG system. In this paper, we propose a Differentiable Data Rewards (DDR) method, which end-to-end trains RAG systems by aligning data preferences between different RAG modules. DDR works by collecting the rewards to optimize each agent with a rollout method. This method prompts agents to sample some potential responses as perturbations, evaluates the impact of these perturbations on the whole RAG system, and subsequently optimizes the agent to produce outputs that improve the performance of the RAG system. Our experiments on various knowledge-intensive tasks demonstrate that DDR significantly outperforms the SFT method, particularly for LLMs with smaller-scale parameters that depend more on the retrieved knowledge. Additionally, DDR exhibits a stronger capability to align the data preference between RAG modules. The DDR method makes generation module more effective in extracting key information from documents and mitigating conflicts between parametric memory and external knowledge. All codes are available at https://github.com/OpenMatch/RAG-DDR.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Oct. 2024

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2410.13509v1

, , , , In recent years, Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in various natural language processing tasks. However, they often struggle with producing accurate responses due to hallucinations. To address this issue, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has been introduced as a solution to enhance LLMs by retrieving knowledge from external sources. The integration of RAG pipelines into LLMs has been achieved through instruction tuning, which optimizes LLMs to effectively utilize retrieved knowledge for diverse tasks. While supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has been the conventional approach for adapting LLMs to RAG pipelines, it tends to lead to overfitting and overlooks the varying data preferences among agents within the system. In response to these limitations, a new method called Differentiable Data Rewards (DDR) is proposed in this paper. DDR aims to train RAG systems end-to-end by aligning data preferences between different modules. By collecting rewards and optimizing each agent with a rollout method, DDR prompts agents to sample potential responses, evaluate their impact on the overall system, and optimize outputs that improve system performance. Experimental results on knowledge-intensive tasks demonstrate that DDR outperforms SFT, especially for smaller-scale LLMs that heavily rely on retrieved knowledge. Additionally, DDR exhibits a stronger capability in aligning data preferences between RAG modules, making the generation module more effective in extracting key information from documents and mitigating conflicts between parametric memory and external knowledge. Previous research has focused on optimizing LLMs for RAG through methods like INFO-RAG and RA-DIT. While reinforcement learning algorithms have been used for preference optimization in individual agents, DDR stands out by focusing on aligning data preferences across different agents within the multi-agent system. This approach avoids overfitting training signals and enhances the effectiveness of RAG optimization compared to traditional methods like SFT. Overall, the DDR method presents a promising advancement in training RAG systems and improving the performance of LLMs when handling complex language generation tasks. The code for implementing DDR is available at https://github.com/OpenMatch/RAG-DDR.
Created on 12 Nov. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.